| 研究生: |
王宣叡 Hsuan-Jui Wang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
集集地震強地動資料之分析 Strong ground motion analysis from Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
黃俊鴻
Jing-Hung Huang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 98 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 195 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 近斷層效應 、集集地震 、反應譜 、強地動分析 、基線修正 、Newmark滑移量分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Chi-Chi earthquake, Response spectrum, Baseline correction, Strong ground motion analysis, Near-fault effect, Newmark sliding block method |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:21 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以中央氣象局地震監測系統在全台各定點站接收的資料,進行強地動資料之分析。首先簡介台灣地理環境與車籠埔斷層之概況,對集集地震台灣各地場址、地震譜、地動參數與其衰減律作一回顧。接著以Fortran語言撰寫資料處理所需之計算機程式GMA(Ground Motion Analysis),該程式內含基線修正(Baseline Correction)、數值積分(Numerical Integration)、強震參數(Ground Motion Parameters)(共15個)計算、線性反應譜(Linear Response Spectrum)、富氏振幅譜(Fourier Amplitude Spectrum)、功率譜(Power Spectrum)、振幅概率密度譜(Probability Density)、運用Newmark法的滑移量積分(Newmark Integration Method)等副程式。非線性反應譜(Nonlinear Response Spectrum)的部分以商用程式BISPEC執行。從時間域和頻率域分析集集地震台灣各地區受地震作用下地盤的振動反應,比較NS、EW及UD三個方向之地動內涵,並呈現地動參數之衰減律、Newmark滑移量與近斷層效應之分析。
計算機程式GMA將各類地震譜與地動參數之數據輸出至Excel檔案,並將資料繪圖,不僅增加本研究之便利性,可協助往後地震工程研究者資料處理的效率。
This paper analyzed the strong ground motion characteristics of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake using TSMIP (Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation Program) records. First, the geologic environment and Che-Long-Pu fault in Taiwan were introduced, and the literatures on earthquake spectrum, ground motion parameters and its attenuation characteristics of the Chi-Chi earthquake were summarized. Then, the computer program GMA (Ground Motion Analysis) developed by FORTRAN was used to carry out the analysis work. The program consists of many calculation functions, such as baseline correction, numerical integration, ground motion parameters calculation (15 parameters totally), linear response spectrum, fourier amplitude spectrum, power spectrum, probability density spectrum and Newmark residual displacement integration. The nonlinear response spectrum was calculated by the commercial program BISPEC. The ground motion characteristics of the Chi-Chi earthquake was analyzed in time and frequency domains and in three different directions (NS、EW and UD). The results of analysis also showed the ground motion attenuation, Newmark sliding analysis and the near-fault effect.
The computer program GMA can output many kinds of earthquake spectrum data and ground motion parameters as Excel file and it can plot these data in the sheets of the Excel file. The GMA makes the analysis very convenient and fast, therefore it will benefit the people who need to process the earthquake ground motion data.
1.Chopra, Anil K., Dynamics of structures : Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2nd edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp. 14-28 (2001).
2.Abramson, Lee W., Thomas S. Lee, Sunil Sharma and Glenn M. Boyce, Slope stability and stabilization methods, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 393-404 (2002).
3.Ebeling, Robert M., “Introduction to the computation of response spectrum for earthquake loading” US Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi, pp. 36-43 (1992).
4.Wen, K. L., Peng, H. Y., Tsai, Y. B., and Chen, K. C. (2001), “Why 1 g was recorded at TCU129 site during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake?”, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 5, 1255-1266.
5.Das, B. M., Fundamentals of Soil Dynamics, Pws -Kent, Boston(1982).
6.Arias, A. (1970). "A Measure of Earthquake Intensity," R.J. Hansen, ed. Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 438-483.
7.Newmark, N. M. and W. J. Hall, 1982. Earthquake Spectra and Design, EERI Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA.103p.
8.Trnfunac, M. D. and A. G. Brady, 1975. On the correlation of seismic intensity with peaks of recorded strong groundmotion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65,139-162.
9.Ambraseys, N., and M. Srbulov, “Earthquake Induced Displacements of Slope,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.14, pp.59-71, 1995.
10.Ambraseys, N.N., and J.M. Menu, “Earthquake-Induced Ground Displacements,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.16, pp.985-1006, 1988.
11.Jibson, R.W., and D.K. Keefer, “Analysis of the Seismic Origin of Landslides: Examples from New Madrid Seismic Zone,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol.105, pp.521-536, 1993.
12.Vessely, D.A., and D.H. Cornforth, “Estimating SeismicDisplacements of Marginally Stable Landslides Using Newmark Approach,” in P. Dakoulas, ed., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, ASCE, pp.800-811, 1998.
13.Lee, C. T., Cheng, C. T., Liao, C. W., Tsai, Y. B., 2001. Site classifications of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91:1283-1297.
14.Boore, D. M., 2001a. Comparisons of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 1212-1217.
15.Boore, D. M., 2001b. Effect of baseline corrections on displacement sand response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 1199-1211.
16.Chang, T. P. and G. K. Yu, 2002. A study of strong motion response spectrum in west-central Taiwan. TAO, 13, 135-152.
17.Huang, C. T. and S. S. Chen, 2000. Near-field characteristics and engineering implications of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Seis., 2, 23-41.
18.Liu, K. S., T. C. Shin and Y. B. Tsai, 1999. A free-field strong motion network in Taiwan: TSMIP. TAO, 10, 377-396.
19.Shin, T. C., 2000. Chi-Chi earthquake-seismology, Proceedings, International workshop on the September 21, 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, 1-14.
20.Shin, T. C. and T. L. Teng, 2001. An overview of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 895-913.
21.Tsai, Y. B. and M. W. Huang, 2000. Strong ground motion characteristics of the Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake of September 21, 1999. Earthquake Eng. Eng. Seism., 2, 1-21.
22.Titchmarsh, E.C., “Introduction to the theory of Fourier Integrals,” Oxford University Press, Oxford. (1948).
23.Nigam, N. C. and C. Jennings, 1969. Calculation of response spectra from strong-motion earthquake record, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v59, p909-922.
24.大崎順彥,地震動的譜分析入門,地震出版社,北京(2008)。
25.岡本舜三,地震工程學,科技圖書,台北(1998)。
26.吳卓岡,2001。臺北盆地地盤放大特性之研究。國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
27.郭鎧紋,1994。中央氣象局強地動觀測網之地質特性研究(三)—嘉南地區,中央氣象局八十三年度研究報告,第CW83-1A-12。
28.羅俊雄、辛在勤,1998。嘉義瑞里地震強地動特性。結構工程,第13卷,第3期,第5-22頁。
29.李政寬、羅俊雄、辛在勤,1999。集集地震之地震觀測及強地動分析。結構工程,第14卷,第3期,第5-28頁。
30.黃文紀,1999。嘉南地區之地震源特性。國立中央大學地球物理研究所博士論文。
31.溫國樑、羅俊雄、彭翰毅、劉良方,1999。集集地震之強地動特性。結構工程,第14卷,第3期,第29-37頁。
32.蔡義本、黃明偉、趙曉玲,1999。1999年9月21日台灣集集大地震的震源與強地動特性初步分析結果。中國土木水利工程學刊,第26卷,第3期,第5-18頁。
33.黃慶東,2000。近斷層地震地動特性與震譜特性之探討。結構工程,第15卷,第2期,第91-113頁。
34.王乾盈,2000。集集地震之可能孕震構造。國科會集集地震研究系列研討會,孕震構造及活斷層調查,第1-16頁。
35.陳希舜、鄭丁興,2000a。台灣地區考慮地盤影響之強震特性。中國土木水利工程學刊,第12卷,第3期,第445-453頁。
36.張添炮、余貴坤,2002。台灣中西部地區反應譜顯著週期之研究。中央氣象局氣象學報,第44卷,第1期,第51-63頁。
37.趙曉玲,2001。利用921地震序列之強地動資料對台灣強地動衰減模式與反應譜速估之研究。國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文。
38.羅俊雄,「地震資料處理及基本應用」,地工技術雜誌,第9期,61-66頁(1985)。
39.溫國樑、簡文郁、張毓文(2004)。台灣地區強地動場址效應之研究,中央氣象局地震技術報告(MOTC-CWB-93-E-09)。
40.王乾盈,陳桂寶,1993。蘭陽平原之區域場址效應,臺灣地區強地動觀測計畫研討會論文摘要,第74-80頁。
41.何春蓀,1986。臺灣地質概論,中華民國經濟部。
42.辛在勤,1993。臺灣地區強地動觀測計畫,臺灣地區強地動觀測計畫研討會論文摘要,第1-10頁。
43.林淑芳,1996。臺灣西北部地區強地動場址效應分析。國立中央大學碩士論文。
44.徐鐵良,2000。地質與工程,中國工程學會,第6-52頁。
45.鄭世楠、葉永田、徐明同、張建興、辛在勤,1998。台灣地區十大地震災害地震圖集的整理與製造,第七屆台灣地區地球物理研討會論文集,第309-318頁。