| 研究生: |
雷啓祥 Chii-Shyang Lei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
商標對廠商績效的影響-台灣製造業的實證研究 |
| 指導教授: |
楊志海
Chih-Hai Yang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 53 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 商標 、專利 、企業經營績效 、面板數據 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Trademark, Patent, Business performance, Panel data |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:27 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文旨在探討商標等無形資產,對廠商的經營績效會產生何種影響。利用1,149家台灣的製造業上市公司在2002年至2018年的資料為研究樣本,使用結合橫斷面與時間序列的Panel data模型,透過實證分析來進行研究,並探討商標的影響效果是否在民生工業與非民生工業廠商間存在差異。
本論文使用 Tobin^' s Q、淨利率和營業收入作為廠商績效的衡量指標。實證結果顯示:(1). 商標對廠商的 Tobin^' s Q 有顯著正相關,但不顯著影響淨利率及營業收入,意味著做商標相關的投資,雖然短期獲利能力並沒有顯著的提升,但具有更高的市場價值與未來發展性。(2). 商標是民生工業廠商特別重視的無形資產,平均每年民生工業廠商會比非民生工業廠商多出5.91個商標數投資。同時,商標對民生工業廠商的短期績效也具有顯著正相關性。
The purpose of study was to investigate whether and how intangible assets affect firms’ financial performance, particularly the role of trademarks. We used 1,149 listed manufacturing companies in manufacturing industry in Taiwan from 2002 to 2018, and adopted panel data model to implement estimations. Furthermore, this thesis examines the potential difference in the impact of trademarks on firm performance between the livelihood industry and non- livelihood industry.
We used Tobin's Q, net profit margin, and revenue as indicators of firm performance. The empirical results show that: (1) Trademarks do not significantly improve short-term profitability, but it has higher market value and future development for the companies. (2) Trademarks are especially important for firm performance in livelihood industries. On average, there are 5.91 more trademarks per year for firms of livelihood industries than non-livelihood industry manufacturers. At the same time, the trademark has a significant positive correlation with the short-term profitability for livelihood industrial manufacturers.
1. 沈明憲(2008),「研發支出與專利權對於公司價值的影響-台灣上市公司實證研究」,中央大學碩士論文。
2. 李茂堂,(1997),〈智慧財產權實務〉,健行文化出版股份有限公司。
3. 柯勝揮, & 陳瑞呈 (2019),「企業國際化與廠商優勢對經營績效影響之探討兼論經營能力之干擾-以臺灣電子業為例」,北商學報, (36), 95-120.
4. 許凱傑(2020),「創新表現對於企業績效之影響:動態能力與規模的調節效果」,國立台灣大學碩士論文。
5. 彭作奎, 黃博暉, & 謝佑立 (2010),「研究發展對生技產業經營績效影響之實證研究」,生物產業科技管理叢刊, 2(1), 1-43.
6. 彭朱如, 劉哲瑋, & 顏孟賢 (2015) ,〈從代工到自創品牌: 在合作中啟動競爭」, 管理學報, 32(4), 347-369.
7. 楊志海, & 陳忠榮 (2002) ,「研究發展, 專利與生產力-台灣製造業的實證研究」,經濟論文叢刊, 30(1), 27-48.
8. 楊志龍 (2018) ,「研發, 專利對公司經營績效之影響: 以台灣高科技產業為例.」,國立交通大學博士論文。
9. 鄭凱文(2010),「長期投資類型與公司績效之研究-以台灣電子產業為例」,國立交通大學碩士論文。
10. 鄭中人 (2001) ,「智慧財產權法」,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
11.劉正田, 林修葳, & 金成隆 (2005),〈創新價值鏈之路徑分析: 金業研發投資成效之實證研究〉, 管理評論, 24(4), 29-56.
12. Andries, P., & Faems, D. (2013). Patenting activities and firm performance: does firm size matter?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1089-1098.
13. Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., & Neslin, S. A. (2003). Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. Journal of marketing, 67(4), 1-17.
14. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567-574.
15. Basberg, B. L. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research policy, 16(2-4), 131-141.
16. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 529-554.
17. Besen, S. M., & Raskind, L. J. (1991). An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 3-27.
18. Bahadir, S. C., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Srivastava, R. K. (2008). Financial value of brands in mergers and acquisitions: Is value in the eye of the beholder?. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 49-64.
19. Cockburn, I. M., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock markets valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic Review, 78(2), 419-426.
20. Czarnitzki, D., & Toole, A. A. (2011). Patent protection, market uncertainty, and R&D investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 147-159.
21. Cabral, L . M .(2000). R&D cooperation and product market competition.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(7), 1033-1047.
22. González-Pedraz, C., & Mayordomo, S. (2012). Trademark activity and the market performance of US commercial banks. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), 931-950.
23. Green, J. P., Stark, A. W., & Thomas, H. M. (1996). UK evidence on the market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23(2), 191-216.
24. Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics letters, 7(2), 183-187.
25. Krasnikov, A., Mishra, S. & Orozco, D. (2009). Evaluating the financial impact of branding using trademarks : A framework and empirical evidence, Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 154-166.
26. Loderer ,C. and Waelchli ,U. (2010) ,“ Firm age and performance,” Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper, Vol.26450,posted 7
27. Hall, B. H., Thoma, G., & Torrisi, S. (2007). The market value of patents and R&D: Evidence from European firms. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2007(1), 1-6.
28. Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1987). Trademark law: An economic perspective. The Journal of Law and Economics, 30(2), 265-309.
29. Morbey, G. K., & Reithner, R. M. (1990). How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Research-Technology Management, 33(3), 11-14.
30. Quillen Jr, C. D., Webster, O. H., & Eichmann, R. (2002). Continuing patent applications and performance of the US Patent and Trademark Office-Extended. Fed. Cir. BJ, 12, 35.
31. Raggio, R. D., & Leone, R. P. (2007). The theoretical separation of brand equity and brand value: Managerial implications for strategic planning. Journal of Brand Management, 14(5), 380-395.
32. Simon, C. J., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The measurement and determinants of brand equity: A financial approach. Marketing science, 12(1), 28-52.
33. Shepherd, W. G. (1972). The elements of market structure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(1), 25-37.