創業經濟日益成為一國經濟增長之根本性動力。美國經濟能夠渡過能源危機和戰後嬰兒潮的雙重威脅，全賴於所謂“創業型”經濟體系。歐盟委員會的報告，也自承，歐洲始終未能挑戰美國經濟的霸權地位“在很大程度上與（創業）心理有關，而不是與結構缺陷有關。”而臺灣過去幾十年的經濟奇蹟，到前幾年能夠安然度過亞洲金融風暴，以及迅速從九二一震災中復原，“創業精神”絕對也是很重要的因素。與普通創業者相比，擁有資源優勢的專業經理人自行創業也同樣需要面對角色轉變的問題。
本研究探討創業管理以及專業經理人與創業家角色差異之相關理論，以回答從專業經理人到創業家如何進行角色轉換的問題。本研究以個案研究方法，深入分析個人親歷之創業公司成長過程中重要事件，結合文獻探討、次級資料、與訪談內容，分析從專業經理人到創業家這一角色轉換過程中的關鍵問題。本研究除以理論推演出角色轉換中的主要問題，並以深入的個案分析，論述創業機會選擇和人力資源整合是專業經理人在創業管理中需要面臨的關鍵問題，達成本研究之目的。

Entrepreneurship is more and more important to national economics grown-up. It’s because of so-called “entrepreneurship” economics system that USA could survive from Petroleum Crisis and Post-war Baby Tide. The EU council reports that, it’s mainly in relation to the lack of entrepreneurship, not structure defect, that Europe couldn’t challenge economic hegemony of USA still now. Entrepreneurship is also the important factor to Taiwanese economic miracle. But, while professional manager has more resource advantages than common peoples, he still has to face the matter of role changes, when he begins new business ventures.
This research aimed on theories such as entrepreneurship management and the role difference between professional manager and entrepreneur, in order to answer the question how to change from professional manager to entrepreneur. The case study method is applied, and my own new business venture was examined. The research combined the literature review, secondary data, and the studied cases, to pick out the key issues for the role change from professional manager to entrepreneur. Based on theories review and detailed case study, the research makes conclusions that the key issues of entrepreneur management for professional manager are (1)venture chances evaluation and (2)human resources integration.

一、中文部分
1. 周育亨，「台灣卓越企業組織虛擬化程度之研究」，台灣大學商學研究碩士論文，民86。
2. 林佳珍，「虛擬組織應用於策略聯盟管理績效之研究」，台灣科技大學管理技術研究所碩士論文，民88。
3. 高建 等譯，新企業與創業者，中國大陸，清華大學出版社，2002，pp.14-20。
4. 孫建敏 等譯，組織行爲學，中國大陸，中國人民大學出版社，1997，pp.519-535。
5. 陳志剛，“WAPI‘身後’事”，21世紀經濟報道 No.249，2004年6月7日，28版。
6. 張曉君 等譯，管理學，中國大陸，經濟科學出版社，1998，pp.205-223。
7. 張福成，企業並購之個案研究，國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，民國89年。
8. 齊立文 譯，從創業家到執行長，臺北市，商智文化，民國91年。
9．蔡雅嵐，「虛擬組織之信任問題—以個人理性、社會及倫理的觀點」，政治大學公共行政研究碩士論文，民90。
10. 蕭富峰、李田樹譯，創新與創業精神，麥田，民國84年，pp.13－16。
二、英文部分
1. Beyer, M.(1995). “Is There a Future for Management”, Nursing Management, vol. 26, no. 1, 1995, pp. 24-25.
2. Bhide, A.(1986), “Hustle as Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 1986.9
3. Bhide, A.(1994), “How Entrepreneurs Craft Strategies That Work”, Harvard Business Review, 1994.3
4. Bhide, A. (1996), “The Questions Every Entrepreneur Must Answer”, Harvard Business Review, 1996.11
5. Buck, B. (2004), “European Hesitation on Entrepreneurship”, Financial Times, 2004.3.5
6. Chiesa, V. and Manzini, R.(1998). “Profiting from the Virtual Organization of Technological Innovation: Suggestions from an Empirical Study,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 15, 1998, pp. 109-123.
7. Churchill, G.A. Jr. (1999). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 7th Edition. The Dryden Press.
8. Claude, F.(1997), “How Virtual Organizing is Transforming Management Science,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, Sep. 1997, pp.105-120.
9. Davis, T. R. V. and Daring, B. L(1995), “How Virtual Corporations Manage The Performance of Contractors: The Super Bakery Case,” Organization Dynamics, vol. 24, 1995, pp.70-75.
10. Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C. K. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 1990.4
11. Goldman, S., R. M. Nagel & K. Preiss(1995). Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995.
12. Monge, P. and DeSanctis, G.(1999), “Introduction to the Special Issue : Communication Processes for Virtual Organization,” Organization Science, vol. 10, No.6, Nov.-Dec. 1999, pp.693-703.