| 研究生: |
洪雅芬 Yafen Hong |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
綠建築與房地產投資影響因子關聯性之探討 A Study on The Relationships between Green Buildings and Real Estate Investment Factors |
| 指導教授: |
王翰翔
Han-Hsiang Wang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木系營建管理碩士在職專班 Executive Master's Program in Construction Management, Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 86 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 房地產週期 、房地產市場 、綠建築 、綠建築投資 、永續 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | green building investment |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:11 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
建築物排放溫室氣體的來源為主要為能源的使用,例如用電、使用煤油或天然氣發熱與烹飪,所排放之二氧化碳比率約為所有能源使用的三分之一,因此推動節能建築或評估方式更具有綜合性的綠建築,為減緩全球暖化的方法。綠建築的效益可以分為經濟、社會、環境三個層面,以經濟效益來看,獲利為房地產投資者優先考慮的因素。然而綠建築在房地產市場中的擴張,取決於市場的成熟度,而市場成熟度的提升與三個層面都有相關。為了解哪些具體因素會影響綠建築的投資,本研究從房地產投資的方向去看綠建築,而不是單純從綠建築本身的經濟效益來看,將觀察的角度帶入較宏觀的源頭,並從文獻回顧中探討影響房地產投資的因素,歸納出24個因子,即影響建商或民眾投資與購買房地產意願的因子,以問卷調查的方式,比較這24個因子對綠建築投資成效的影響。其中以「地點」得分最高,其次為相同得分之「開發政策」、「工程品質與數量」。經由比較平均數法得到的結果,年紀較輕的受訪者對許多影響因子的給分明顯較低,可以解釋為台灣的房地產並非成熟市場,不是由年輕人來主導發展方向,他們也認知綠建築並非目前的主流。另外將房地產投資影響因子分為四大類群組,並進行迴歸分析,得到群組中的項目之間有因果關係且呈正比,表示提升其中一些項目,就能提升整個分群的效果,這些群組包含「環境與硬體」、「資訊管理」與「人力資源」,在政策上可以選擇群組中影響較大、或較為容易執行的項目來改善,並提升整個產業的基本價值,以利房地產市場的成熟,進而促進綠建築的擴張。
Energy consumptions are the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions of buildings. Around a third of the energy consumptions contribute to carbon dioxide emission. Thus, promoting energy-saving buildings or green buildings with comprehensive evaluation methods is a solution to mitigate global warming. The benefits of green buildings involve economic, social and environmental aspects. From the economic benefit aspect, profiting is real estate investors’ first consideration. The expansion of green buildings in a real estate market depends on market maturity, and the increase of market maturity is related to the three aforementioned aspects. In order to understand what factors affect the investment of green buildings, this research analyzes green buildings from the perspective of real estate investment instead of the perspective of economic benefits of green buildings. This research summarizes from literatures 24 factors that affect developers and the public’s decisions on investing or buying real properties. Then questionnaire survey is conducted to analyze the effects of these factors on the green building investment outcomes. The survey result shows “location” is the most significant factor, which is followed by “development policy” and “construction quality and quantity” of the same significance. According to the results of comparing means, younger interviewees give lower scores for many factors. This fact explains that the real estate market in Taiwan is not a mature market; its development direction is not determined by the youth; and the youth do not see green buildings as mainstream in the real estate market. In addition, the 24 factors are classified into four major groups, and three of them, i.e., “environment and hardware,” “information management,” and “human resources” are found positively correlated through regression analysis. This result benefits government policy-making by allowing it to select the groups with higher influences or easier implementing items for improvement. The fundamental values of the construction industry can thus be increased, the real estate market can mature, and the expansions of green buildings can be facilitated.
Abdul, Y. (2011). Delivering Sustainable Buildings: Savings and Payback. Retrieved from http://www.breeam.com/filelibrary/Presentations/DeliveringSustainableBuildingsSlides.pdf
Adhikari, R. S., Aste, N., Pero, C. D., & Manfren , M. (2011). Net Zero Energy Buildings: Expense or Investment? 2nd International Conference on Advances in Energy Engineering. Elsevier Ltd. Selection.
American Institute of Architects. (2007). Retrieved from AIA: http://www.aia.org/advocacy/publicpolicy/incentives/AIAB028722
Beattie, A. (2016). Simple Ways to Invest in Real Estate . Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/06/realestateinvest.asp
Bryunina, D. (2014). Value of Commercial Real Estate investments: Sustainability perspective in Sweden and France. KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Master Thesis.
Building Owners and Managers Association. (2012). Retrieved from BOMA Benchmarking Report Shows Income Increases as Utility Expenses Continue to Decrease: http://www.boma.org/research/newsroom/press-room/2012/Pages/BOMA-Benchmarking-Report-Shows-Income-Increases-as-Utility-Expenses-Continue-to-Decrease.aspx
Choi, F., & Scott, L. (2007). LEED Cost Benefit Study. Hawaii Green Building Conference. Hawaii D.O.E. Schools.
Eichholtz , P., Kok, N., & Quigley , J. M. (2009). Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings. Berkeley campus: University of California Energy Institute.
Elkington, J. (1994). Retrieved from http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2011/spring/article2.html
Foldvary, F. E. (1997, Oct). The Business Cycle. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 56, No. 4.
Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2008). Pricing Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation of the Value Impacts of Green Building Certification. ARES.
General Services Administration. (2004). Retrieved from LEED Cost Study Final Report: Order No. P-00-02-CY0065
Goddard, J. G. (2012). Real estate investment : a value based approach. Springer.
Institution of Civil Engineers. (2015). Retrieved from ICE: https://www.ice.org.uk/disciplines-and-resources/briefing-sheet/embodied-energy-and-carbon
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Retrieved from IPCC: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
Jackson, J. (2009). How Risky Are Sustainable Real Estate Projects? An Evaluation of LEED and ENERGY STAR Development Options. JOSRE Vol.1, pp. 92-106.
King, N. J., & King, B. J. (2005). Creating Incentives for Sustainable Buildings: A Comparative Law Approach Featuring the United States and the European Union. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, pp. 397-459.
Kok, N., & Holtermans, R. (2015). National Green Building Adoption Index. CBRE Group, Inc.
Kok, N., & Kahn, M. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.usgbc.org/articles/value-green-labels-california-housing-market
Kontokosta, C. E. (2011). Greening the Regulatory Landscape: The Spatial and Temporal Diffusion of Green Building Policies in U.S. Cities. JOSRE Vol.3, pp. 69-90.
McMahan, J. (2006). The handbook of commercial real estate investing. McGraw-Hill Education.
Miller, N., Spivey , J., & Florance , A. (2008). Does Green Pay Off? CoStar.
Mueller, G. R. (1995). Retrieved from Commercial Real Estate Market Cycles: How They Affect Your Local Market: http://www.slideshare.net/CCIM/commercial-realestatemarketcycleshowtheyaffectyourlocalmarket
Rawlinson, & Weight. (2007). Retrieved from ICE: https://www.ice.org.uk/disciplines-and-resources/briefing-sheet/embodied-energy-and-carbon
Reichardt, A., Fuerst, F., Rottke, N. B., & Zietz, J. (2012). Sustainable Building Certification and the Rent Premium: A Panel Data Approach. JRER Vol.34, pp. 100-126.
Thrall , G. I. (2002). Business geography and new real estate market analysis. Oxford University Press.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2014). Retrieved from EIA: http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/
United States Census Bureau. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/popclock/
USGBC. (2015). Retrieved from The Business Case for Green Building: http://www.usgbc.org/articles/business-case-green-building
Wiley, J. A., Benefield , J. D., & Johnson, K. H. (2010). Green Design and the Market for Commercial Office Space. J Real Estate Finan Econ 41, pp. 228-243.
Yudelson, J. (2007). Green Building Incentives That Work: A Closer Look at How Local Governments Are Incentivizing Green Development. NAIOP Research Foundation .
Zalejska Jonsson, A. (2013). In the Business of Building Green: The value of low-energy residential buildings from customer and developer. KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Doctoral Thesis.
內政部建築研究所,(2013),擷取自 http://smartgreen.abri.gov.tw/art.php?no=101
內政部統計處,(2016),擷取自 http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=10599
內政部營建署,(2015),擷取自 http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7305&Itemid=102
沈彥宏,(2015),災後綠色政策對都市不動產市場認知價值影響之研究-以高雄81氣爆重建區域為例,國立屏東大學不動產經營學系碩士班,碩士論文。
林立婷,(2012),以使用者觀點探討綠建築之價值-以辦公廳類綠建築為例,逢甲大學土地管理所,碩士論文。
林勁廷,(2007),永續建築對住宅滿意度影響之研究,國立屏東商業技術學院不動產經營系,碩士論文。
林憲德,(2001),擷取自 綠色魔法學校: http://www.msgt.org.tw/research2_data.php?Type=15&Board_No=7
洪明皇,(2011),台灣高所得者所得份額之變化:1977-2010,調查研究-方法與應用,第30期,頁 48-95。
張又升,(2002),建築物生命週期二氧化碳減量評估,國立成功大學建築學系碩博士班, 博士論文。
張金鶚,(2013),房地產是一輩子的事,原富傳媒。
莊柏炎,(2012),台中地區建築投資開發業者投資興建綠建築意願之研究,逢甲大學土木工程所,碩士論文。
榮泰生,(2013),SPSS與研究方法(3版),五南。
潘鴻銘,(2015),綠建築之建造成本調查-以北、中部地區學校類建築為例,逢甲大學建築學系,碩士論文。
蔡進逵,(2014),住宅類智慧綠建築開發、生產、消費決策之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
鄭維祐,(2012),綠屋頂生命週期與節能效益評估,國立交通大學環境工程系所,碩士論文。
簡惠瑜,(2008),永續建築對不動產市場認知價值影響之研究,國立屏東商業技術學院不動產經營系,碩士論文。