隨著社群網站興起，可以發現現今熱門的社群網站，使用者主動在上面分享和編輯資料，讓網站變得豐富且有趣，這些行為不單單只為了自己，也幫助了他人，我們希望將此種心態和模式運用在學習上。為此我們提出了一個結合社群的學習平台，並透過讚賞和認同機制，促使學生能在上面產生更多有益於他人的學習內容，以及學生可以透過此平台完成老師所出的評量，使平台上與課文內容相關的學習資源越來越豐富，學生之間則可以互相觀摩他人的學習作品，擅於學習的學生能夠幫助學習能力較差的學生，並且協助老師在常態分班的環境下能有更好的教學品質。
本研究共進行了二次實驗，證實了學生願意多花時間，製作出對他人有幫助的作品，另外在動機方面，發現了樂趣、義務和自我發展三項顯著動機。而第二次實驗透過實際教學現場長期觀察，比較與短期使用學習平台之間的差別，證實了此平台能夠在短期就建立起學生利他的行為與態度，且維持住不因新鮮感消失而下降，在名聲動機方面也有顯著的提升。

With the social network sites rise, we can see that users take the initiative to edit and share information on there, and those sites is getting richer and more interesting. Their behaviors not only for themselves but also help others. We expected these behaviors of user can apply in the learning. For this reason, we proposed a social learning platform and a mechanism of compliment and assurance, inducing students to share more information which are benefit others. Students are able to do multimedia assessment by teacher on this platform. Let the platform is getting richer of learning resources. They are able to watch each other’s learning achievement. Students are good at learning can help who are not good at learning, and assist teacher to have more teaching quality in the normal class grouping.
In this study, we carried out two experiments. We found students willing spend more time to prepare better information for others. In the motivation, we found the enjoyment, commitment and self-development. In the second experiment, we compared the long term with short term for using our platform. We found our platform can build altruistic behavior and attitude of students in the short term, and won’t decrease by boring. And, the reputation motivation has significant increase.

[1] Rushton, J. P. (1982). Altruism and society: A social learning perspective. Ethics, 425-446.
[2] 區祥江。（2009）。《快樂軌迹──10個正向心理學的生活智慧》。香港：突破有限公司。
[3] Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785-791.
[4] Seymour, B., Yoshida, W., & Dolan, R. (2009). Altruistic learning. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 3.
[5] Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N. A. D. I. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2011). Four forms of prosocial motivation: Egoism, altruism, collectivism, and principlism. Social motivation, 103-126.
[6] Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. J. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1601-1610.
[7] Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009, April). Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 945-954). ACM.
[8] Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
[9] Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 68-73.
[10] Brandtzæg, P. B., & Heim, J. (2008). User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on INtelligent TEchnologies for interactive enterTAINment (p. 11). ICST
[11] Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?. Personality and individual differences, 52(3), 243-249.
[12] Shiu, H., Fong, J., & Lam, J. (2010). Facebook–Education with social networking websites for teaching and learning. In Hybrid Learning (pp. 59-70). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[13] Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
[14] Wang, C. H., & Chen, C. P. EFFECTS OF FACEBOOK TUTORING ON LEARNING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE.
[15] Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. E., “Peer.-assisted learning,” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, Vol. 12(2), pp. 113-132, 2001.
[16] Topping, K. J., “Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities,” Review of Educational Research, Vol.68, pp. 249-276, 1998.
[17] Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Programmed Learning, 32(2), 175-187.
[18] Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1974). Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. Transaction Publishers.
[19] 鄭守杰.(2003)。網路同儕互評對國小學童學習成效之影響. 成功大學教育研究所學位論文, 1-198.
[20] 劉旨峰、楊國鑫、林珊如、袁賢銘.(2003)。中學生與網路同儕互評之預測性研究。新竹師院學報,17，51-71。
[21] 于富雲、鄭守杰.(2004)。網路同儕互評與標準建構歷程對國小學生後設認知影響的實證性研究。
[22] 沈慶珩、黃信義 (2006)。網路同儕互評在 Moodle 系統上的應用。教育資料與圖書館學, 43(3), 267-284.
[23] Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education,52(1), 35-44.
[24] 林秋斌、蘇怡慈、李美萱.(2012)。電腦輔助合作學習於分數概念教學之研究。數位學習科技期刊.
[25] 連娟綾.(2013)。朝向利他性的學習評量系統。國立中央大學。
[26] Ames, M., & Naaman, M. (2007, April). Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 971-980). ACM.
[27] Arakji, R., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Koufaris, M. (2009). Exploring contributions of public resources in social bookmarking systems. Decision Support Systems, 47(3), 245-253.
[28] Cheshire, C., & Antin, J. (2008). The social psychological effects of feedback on the production of Internet information pools. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(3), 705-727.
[29] Kuo, F. Y., & Young, M. L. (2008). A study of the intention–action gap in knowledge sharing practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1224-1237
[30] Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo‐sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555-566.
[31] Schroer, J., & Hertel, G. (2009). Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychology, 12(1), 96-120.
[32] Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 758-765.
[33] Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(3), 723-747.
[34] Rashid, A. M., Ling, K., Tassone, R. D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R., & Riedl, J. (2006, April). Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 955-958). ACM.