以英文筆跡衡量中國人領導風格｜國立中央大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	楊道可 Tao-Ko Yang
論文名稱：	以英文筆跡衡量中國人領導風格 Chinese Leadership Styles Assessed by English Handwriting
指導教授：	高尚仁 Henry S.R. Kao
口試委員:
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management
畢業學年度：	92
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	34
中文關鍵詞：	領導風格、筆跡
外文關鍵詞：	Graphology, Leadership Styles, Handwriting
相關次數：	點閱：6 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

英文筆跡分析在歐美地區作為一項招募甄選的工具已行之有年，然而在華人社會中卻沒有相關的應用。因此，本研究之目的在於以英文筆跡分析找出並衡量特定之中國人領導風格。
研究對象以台灣地區121位工作者為主，其中包括中高階管理者與非管理者等職別。研究工具為中國人領導風格量表，以及筆跡分析量表。研究結果發現，中國人領導風格與英文筆跡特徵呈現顯著相關。結論如下：1.英文筆跡分析適用於衡量華人性格特徵2.英文筆跡分析可預測中國人之不同領導風格3.英文筆跡分析未來於招募甄選功能上之可能運用

Handwriting Analysis has an ancient origin. It is used as a selection tool in Europe and the United States with prevalent proportions in the modern times. However, there is no such application in the Chinese society. This research, therefore, aimed at finding specific Chinese leadership styles through English handwriting analysis.
Data were collected from 121 working adults, with an even split between higher-level managers and ordinary workers. A total of 35 graphological parameters were assessed, by using an English handwriting questionnaire, against Chinese leadership styles, through the CPM Leadership Scale (Character, Performance, Maintenance) developed in the Mainland.
A good number of the Chinese leadership traits were found to significantly correlate with many of English graphological parameters. Conclusions were summarized from these results: 1. English handwriting analysis is applicable in assessing Chinese adults. 2. English handwriting analysis is predictive of specific Chinese leadership styles. 3. Potential development of Chinese graphology for HRM applications awaits future research.

Chapter 1	 Introduction                       1
1-1 Research Background                      1
1-2 Research Objectives	                  1
Chapter 2	 Literature Review		         2
2-1 Graphology			         3
2-1-1 The Premise of Graphology	         3
2-1-2 The History of Graphology	         4
2-1-3 Schools of Graphology		         5
2-2 Researches on English Graphology          5
2-3 Researches on Chinese Graphology          7
2-4 Western and Chinese Leadership            8
2-5 Chinese Leadership Styles                 9
2-5-1 The CPM Model of Chinese Leadership	 9
2-6 Graphology and Leadership		11
Chapter 3	 The Present Study			14
3-1 The Conceptual Framework	         14
3-2 Hypotheses				14
3-3 Outcome Variables		         14
3-3-1 English Handwriting			14
3-3-2 Chinese Leadership Styles		17
Chapter 4 Method				18
4-1 Participants				18
4-2 Instruments				19
4-2-1 English Graphology Questionnaire	19
4-2-2 The CPM Leadership Styles		20
4-3 Validity                                  20
4-3-1 Factor Structure of English Handwriting	20
4-3-2 Factor Structure of the CPM Scale	22
4-4 Reliability				23
4-4-1 Reliability of English Handwriting     Questionnaire			         24
4-4-2 Reliability of the CPM Scale		24
4-5 Data Analysis				24
Chapter 5 Results                             26
5-1 Correlation Analysis                      26
5-2 Regression Analysis                       26
5-2-1 Regression Analysis of Personal Information and English Handwriting on the C  dimension                                     26
5-2-2 Regression Analysis of Personal Information and English Handwriting on the P dimension                                     28
5-2-3 Regression Analysis of Personal Information and English Handwriting on the M dimension                                     29
5-3 Hypotheses Testing                        30
5-3-1 The Impact of English Handwriting Analysis on Character and Morality                     30
5-3-2 The Impact of English Handwriting Analysis on Performance                                31
5-3-3 The Impact of English Handwriting Analysis on Maintenance                                31
Chapter 6 Discussion & Conclusions		32
6-1 Discussion                                32
6-2 Managerial Contribution                   33
6-3 Limitations                               33
6-4 Conclusions                               34
References                                    38

                                

Anonymous. 1995. Detecting stress before it''s too late. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(5).
Avishai, R. 1999. The power of the pen. The Internal Auditor, 56(2): 31-34.
Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., Bilu, Y., Ben-Abba, E., & Flug, A. 1986. Can Graphology Predict Occupational Success? Two Empirical Studies and Some Methodological Ruminations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4): 645-653.
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. 1986. The Social Psychology of Chinese People. In M. H. Bond (ed.), The Psychology of Chinese People. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Bolomet, C. 1987. The China Anthology. Brussells: Int’I Association for the Study of Chinese Graphology.
Bond, M. H. 1991. Beyond the Chinese Face. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Boey, K. W. 1991. Differential Relationship of Work Stress to Mental Ill health and Job Dissatisfaction among Nursing Professionals. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 33, 77-86. (In Chinese).
Brayer, R. 1998. When Evidence is on the Line. Security Management: 43-45.
Cheng, P. S., & Chung, C. J. 1982. A Factorial Study of the Effective Leader Behavior of Low-level Military Staff, Chinese Psychology Bulletin, 70(23), 97-106. (In Chinese).
Cheng, B. S., Yang, K. S., & Chuang, C. J. 1985. Task-oriented Leadership Behavior and Subordinate’s Performance: A Supplementary Model and Its Validation. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academic Sinica, 60, 61-119. (In Chinese).
Chou, W. C., & Rudolph, D., 2001. International Handwriting Trait Dictionary. Taiwan: Inno-Excel Consulting Company, Ldt.
Crumbaugh, J. C., & Stockholm, E. 1977. Validation of Graphoanalysis by ‘Global’ or ‘Holistic’ Methods. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44: 403-410.
Crumbaugh, J. C. 1986. Graphoanalytic cued. In B. Nevo (Ed.), Scientific Aspects of Graphology. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Chung, P. L. 1998. Interactional Effects of Superiors’ Personality and Leadership Styles on Immediate Subordinates in Chinese Organizations. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior description. In R. M. Stogdill, & A. E. Coons. (Eds.), Leader Behavior: Its description and Measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Halpin, A. W. 1957. The Observed Leader Behavior and Ideal Leader Behavior of Aircraft Commanders and School Superintendents. In R. M. Stogdill, & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Huang, K. L. 1982. Leadership Styles, Job Nature, Achievement Motivation, Locus of Control, and their influence on Taiwanese Teacher’s Job Satisfaction. Education and Psychology Research, 5, 47-76. (In Chinese).
Huang, K. L. 1983. Business Organizational Patterns and Employee’s Working Morale in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica, 56, 145-193. (In Chinese).
Huang, K. L. 1984. Employees and Job Satisfaction in Organizational Setting: A Study in Taiwan. Chinese Management Research Seminar. Taiwan: Taiwan Notional University Press. (In Chinese).
Keinan, G., & Eilat-Greenberg, S. 1993. Can Stress be Measured by Handwriting analysis? The effectiveness of the analytic method. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42(2): 153-170.
Katz, D., Macoby, N., & Morse, N. C. 1950. Productivity, Supervision and Morale in an Office Situation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
Kao, Henry S. R., & Goan, C. H. 1986. Psychology of Chinese Calligraphy. Taiwan: Tung-Ta. (In Chinese).
Kao, Henry S. R., & Ng. S. H. 1988. Organizational Behavior. Taipei Sanmin Book Company. (In Chinese).
Kao, Henry S. R., Chu, L. C., Yang, T. K., Hsu, H. Y., Pang, B. S., Heh, J. S., & Goan, C. H. 2003. Chinese Personality Assessed by English Handwriting. Unpublished thesis.
Lewinson, T. S. 1986. In Nevo, Baruch (Eds.). 1986. Scientific Aspects of Graphology. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. 1939. Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created Climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10: 271-299.
Leung, K. P. 1997. The Magic of Chinese Signature. Thesis for the Postgraduate Certificate of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong.
Leonard, B. 1999. Reading Employees. HR Magazine, 44(4): 67-73.
Ling, W. Q., & Fang, L. L. 1994. Theories on Leadership and Chinese Cultural: The Formulation of the CPM Model on Leadership Behavior and a Chinese ‘implicit’ Theory on Leadership Traits. In H. S. R. Kao, D. Sinha, & S. H. Ng. (Eds.), Effective Organizations and Social Values: 257-286. India, New Delhi: Sage.
Menasse-Cremers, M. J. 1987. The China Anthology. Brussells: Int’I Association for the Study of Chinese Graphology.
Misumi, J. 1985. The behavior Science of Leadership. An Interdisciplinary Japanese Research Program. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Marne, P. 1990. Practical Graphology: How to Analyze Handwriting. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Michaels, G. The Handwriting Analyst. 2003. www.garthmichaels.com
Pye, L. 1985. Asian Power and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Redding, S. G. 1990. The Spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Roman, K. G. 1952. Handwriting: A Key to Personality. New York: Pantheon.
Riggio, R. E., Lippa, R., & Salinas, C. 1990. The display of personality in expressive movement. Journal of Research in Personality, 24: 16-31.
Satow, R., & Rector, J. 1995. Using Gestalt Graphology to identify Entrepreneurial Leadership. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81: 263-270.
Sackheim, K. K. 1990. Handwriting Analysis and the Employee Selection Process. New York: Quorum Books.
Silin, R. H. 1976. Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large-Scale Taiwanese Enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tan, C. K. 1994. The Chinese Employee’s View of Effective Leadership: A Test of the CPM Model. Unpublished master’s thesis. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Thomas, S. L., & Vaught. S. 2001. The Write Stuff: What the Evidence Says about Using Handwriting Analysis in Hiring. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 66(4): 31-35.
Wellingham-Jones, P. 1989. Evaluation of the Handwriting of Successful Women through the Roman-Staempeli Psychogram. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69: 999-1010.
Whitley, R. D. 1991. The Social Construction of Business Systems in East Asia. Organization Studies, 12(1), 1-28.
Westwood, R. I., & Chan. A. 1992. Headship and Leadership. In R. I. Westwood (ed.), Organizational Behavior: Southeast Asian Perspectives. Hong Kong: Longman.
Yang, K. S., & Lin, B. F. 1964. Chinese handwriting and Personalities: a heuristic research. Research Report. Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University. (In Chinese).
Yang, K. S., & Lee, P. H. 1971. Likeability, Meaningfulness, and Familiarity of 557 Chinese Adjectives for Personality Trait Descriptions. Acta Psychological Taiwanese, 13: 36-57. (In Chinese).

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文