跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 張崑
Kun Chang
論文名稱： 方案導向對技術適能與演化適能之影響
The Effects of Program Orientation on Technical Fitness and Evolutionary Fitness
指導教授： 王存國
Tsuen-Guo Wang
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理學院 - 資訊管理學系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年： 2016
畢業學年度： 104
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 57
中文關鍵詞： 方案導向 、技術適能 、演化適能 、共同願景 、人際整合
外文關鍵詞： program orientation, technical fitness, evolutionary fitness, shared vision, social integration
相關次數： 點閱：18  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 企業現今正面臨著不斷變化的需求，而組織的動態能力扮演著舉足輕重的角色使組織能夠在這不確定的環境生存下來中。然而，甚麼樣的組織導向能夠提升組織動態能力? 根據過去文獻指出，方案導向能夠讓組織在處理各專案時更有彈性的布局和調整，因此，本研究探討組織方案導向對動態能力之間的關係，並且本研究將動態能力分為內部動態反應能力以及外部動態反應能力，即技術適能與演化適能。除此之外，為了讓組織傾向方案導向的作為，本研究也探討組織內可能影響方案導向的因素，分別為共同願景與人際整合。
    本研究採用實徵性研究並蒐集了125間台灣的製造業公司之有效問卷資料。研究結果顯示，企業若有好的人際整合及共同願景的分享，組織能傾向將各資訊系統專案以方案導向的方式進行，並且若以方案導向方式進行資訊系統專案對技術適能與演化適能接有正向的影響。

    Nowadays, organizations are facing changing requirements. Dynamic capability is playing a critical role in helping organizations survive in rapidly changing environments. However, what kind of organizational orientation can enhance dynamic capability? Prior research proved that program orientation can coordinate projects appropriately and respond changes quickly. This research tries to explore the relationship between program orientation and dynamic capability, and we divide dynamic capability in two parts, technical fitness and evolutionary fitness which represent internal dynamic capability and external dynamic capability individually. We also discuss shared vision and social integration that may effects program orientation individually.
    This research collects empirical data from 125 manufacturing firms in Taiwan and analyzes the data with SmartPLS. The result shows that shared vision and social integration have positive impact on program orientation, and program orientation are positively associated with technical fitness and evolutionary fitness.

    Abstract I 中文摘要 II List of Figures V List of Tables VI Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1 1.2 Research Questions 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Shared Vision 4 2.2 Social Integration 5 2.3 Program Orientation 6 2.4 Dynamic Capabilities 8 2.4.1 Technical fitness 9 2.4.2 Evolutionary fitness 9 Chapter 3 Research Model and Hypothesis 10 3.1 Research Model 10 3.2 Hypotheses 12 3.2.1 Shared Vision and Program Orientation 12 3.2.2 Social Integration and Program Orientation 13 3.2.3 Program Orientation and Technical Fitness 14 3.2.4 Program Orientation and Evolutionary Fitness 15 Chapter 4 Research Methodology 16 4.1 Sample Selection and Data Collection 16 4.2 Instrument Development 16 4.2.1 Shared Vision 17 4.2.2 Social Integration 18 4.2.3 Program Orientation 19 4.2.4 Technical Fitness 21 4.2.5 Evolutionary Fitness 22 Chapter 5 Data Analysis and Results 23 5.1 Sample Characteristics 24 5.2 Measurement Model 27 5.2.1 Reliability 27 5.2.2 Validity 28 5.3 Structural Model 31 5.4 Findings and Discussion 34 5.4.1 The Effect of Shared Vision on Program Orientation 34 5.4.2 The Effect of Social Integration on the Program Orientation 34 5.4.3 The Effect of Program Orientation on Technical Fitness 35 5.4.4 The Effect of Program Orientation on the Evolutionary Fitness 35 Chapter 6 Conclusion 36 6.1 Implications 36 6.2 Limitation 37 6.3 Future Research 38 Reference 39 Appendix 43

    Adenfelt, M., 2010. Exploring the performance of transnational projects: shared knowledge, coordination and communication. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 28 (6), 529–538.
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 103(3), 411.
    Angus G. Yu, Markus Kittler. (2012). Matching programme structure to environment: A comparative study of two IS-based change programmes. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 30 (2012) 740–749
    Boyatzis,R.E.(2008). Leadership development formal complexity perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60, 298313.doi:10.1037/1065-9293.60.4.298
    Cooper, R., Edgett, S., Kleinschmidt, E., (1997). Portfolio management in new product development: lessons from the leaders II. Research Technology Management Vol. 40 (6), 43–52.
    Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J., 1995. Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management Vol. 12, 374–391.
    Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, Vol. 295(2), 295-336.
    Collis, D.J., 1994. Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal Vol. 15, 143–152.
    Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative science quarterly, 52-73.
    Danneels, E., 2008. Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 29, 519–543.
    DC Ferns. (1991) Developments in programme management. 0263-7863/91/030148-0901991 Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd
    Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environment. Academy of Management Journal Vol. 32, 543–576.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382- 388.
    Gijselaers, W. ,Segers, M., and Kirschner, P.A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving team work in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research Vol. 37, 490 521doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
    Henderson, J.C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal Vol. 32(1), 472-484.
    Haughey, D. (2001). A perspective on programme management. Project Smart Website. Retrieved from: http://www.projectsmart. co.uk/docs/program - Management study. Pdf
    John H Payne & J Rodney Turner., (1999). Company-wide Project management: The Planning and control of programmes of projects of different type. Internationa Journal of Project Management Vol. 17(1), 55-59.
    JR Turner and A Speiser. (1992) Programme management and its information systems requirements. 0263-7863/92/04019&l1@1992Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd
    Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(4), 931-954.
    Lycett M, Rassau A, Danson J. (2004). Programme management: a critical review. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 22(4):289–99
    Merchant KA, Van der Stede WA. (2003) Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation, and incentives. New York: FT Prentice-Hall.
    Mimi Lord. (2015). Group learning capacity: the roles of open-mindedness and shared vision
    Mahon, E. G., Taylor, S. N., and Boyatzis, R. E. (2014). Antecedents of orga- nizational engagement: Exploring vision, mood and perceived organizational support with emotional intelligence as a moderator
    Office of Government Commerce (OGC) (2007). Managing Successful Programmes
    Project Management Institute (PMI®) (2006). The Standard for Program Management. Project Management Institute, Inc., Newton Square (USA).
    Pellegrinelli S. Programme management: organising project-based change. International Journal of Project Management 1997; Vol. 15(3).
    Packendorff, J., 1995. Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management Vol. 11, 319–333.
    Project Management Institute, 2008a. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Fourth Edition. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square (PA).
    Peter M. Blau,. (1960). A Theory of Social Integration. The American Journal of Sociology Vol. 6.
    Roussel, P.A., Saad, K.N., Erickson, T.J., (1991). Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Arthur D. Little, Inc., USA.
    Senge, P.M.(1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
    Sergio Pellegrinelli. (1997). Programme management: organising project-based v change, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 15, No. 3, 141-149
    Sapsed, J., Salter, A. (2004). Postcards from the edge: local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies Vol. 25, 1515–1534.
    Sawers,J.L.,Pretorius,M.W.,Oerlemans,L.A.D.,2008.Safe guarding SMEs dynamic capabilities in technology innovative SME—large company partner ships in South Africa. Technovation Vol. 28,171–182.
    Tsai,W, and Ghoshal,S. (1998).Social capital and value creation : the role of Intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Review Vol. 41, 464–476.doi:10.2307/ 257085
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 18, 509–533.
    Tjosvold, D., Yu, Z., and Hui,C.(2004).Team learning from mistakes : the contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving. Journal of Educational and Management Studies Vol. 41, 1223–1245.
    Turner, J.R., Müller, R., 2003. On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 21, 1–8.
    UNRISD. (1994). Social Integration: Approaches and Issues. World Summit for Social Development. http://www.unrisd.org.
    Wang, C.L., and Ahmed, P.K., 2007. Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9, 31–51.
    Winter, S.G., 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 24, 991–996.

    QR CODE
    :::