跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹佳穎
CHIA-YING CHAN
論文名稱: 本土廠商對外資廠商的技術追趕 -- 以越南製造業為例
Technological Catch-up effect between local firm and foreign firm - The case of Vietnam’s Manufacturing.
指導教授: 楊志海
CHIH-HAI YANG
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 55
中文關鍵詞: 隨機共同邊界模型技術效率技術追趕所有權區分
外文關鍵詞: Meta-Frontier Model, Technological Efficiency, Catch-up, Ownership
相關次數: 點閱:15下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文估計越南本土廠商與外資廠商的技術效率,並探討本土廠商是否對外資廠商存在技術追趕。利用越南2000 年至2008 年的企業調查資料,並採用共同隨機邊界模型進行估計,實證結果顯示:於樣本期間本土廠商與外資廠商的技術效率各由0.9073 至0.8465 及0.9384 至0.8006,觀察出初期外資廠商技術效率優於本土廠商,但下降幅度相較比本土廠商大於7.98%。利用技術缺口比率(TGR)來衡量技術追趕,本文發現本土廠商與外資廠商的技術缺口比率大多呈現擴大的情形,表示本土廠商不存在技術追趕效果。另外,以越南製造業中產出占比最高的食品加工業與紡織業為例,亦呈現出一致的估計結果。


    The paper evaluates technical efficiencies of local firms and foreign-owned enterprises (FOEs) in Vietnam, and examines the degree of technological catchup between local firms and their foreign-owned counterparts. Based on Vietnam’s Firm Surveys for the 2000-2008 period, the estimates obtained by using stochastic meta-frontier model suggest that both local firms and FOEs exhibited a decreasing trend on technical efficiency, from 0.9384 to 0.8006 and 0.9073 to 0.8465, respectively. The change of technological efficiency in foreign firms is large than the change in local firms and the catch-up effect of local firms didn’t exist. First, the technological efficiency of the foreign firms is superior to local firms. The technological efficiency for the formers in Vietnam range from 0.9384 to 0.8006, and the latter is 0.9073 to 0.8465. Crucially, using the technology gap ratio (TGR) as an indicator of technological catch-up, results show a widening TGR, indicating a technological falling-behind rather than catching-up between local firms and FOEs. We find similar results when focusing on two key industries: food processing and textile industries.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 v 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 外人直接投資對當地企業生產力的影響性 6 第二節 共同邊界生產函數模型比較跨國或不同所有權廠商間技術追趕的文獻 9 第三章 研究方法與資料來源 13 第一節 實證方法與模型 13 第二節 資料分析與樣本處理 19 第四章 實證結果與分析 26 第一節 Translog 生產函數實證模型 26 第二節 技術效率與技術缺口比率 29 第三節 個別主流產業情形-以食品加工與紡織業為例 33 第五章 結論與建議 41 第一節 研究結論 41 第二節 建議未來研究方向 42 參考文獻 43

    Amiti, M., & Cameron, L. (2007). Economic geography and wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 15-29.
    Aw, B. Y., & Palangkaraya, A. (2004). Local knowledge spillovers in the Indonesian manufacturing industry. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
    Barrios, S., & Strobl, E. (2002). Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Spanish experience. Review of World Economics, 138(3), 459-481.
    Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. In International applications of productivity and efficiency analysis (pp. 149-165). Springer Netherlands.
    Battese, G. E., & Rao, D. P. (2002). Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 87.
    Battese, G. E., Rao, D. P., & O'donnell, C. J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 91-103.
    Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic surveys, 12(3), 247-277.
    Blomstrom, M., & Wolff, E. N. (1989). Multinational corporations and productivity convergence in Mexico (No. w3141). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?. Journal of international Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
    Demena, B. A., & van Bergeijk, P. A. (2017). A meta‐analysis of FDI and productivity spillovers in developing countries. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 546-571.
    Fukao, K., Inui, T., Ito, K., Kim, Y. G., & Yuan, T. (2011). An international comparison of the TFP levels and the productivity convergence of Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese and Chinese listed firms. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 9(2), 127-150.
    Hayami, Y. (1969). Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 564-575.
    Herzer, D. (2017). Foreign direct investment and total factor productivity in Bolivia. Applied Economics Letters, 24(6), 399-403.
    Ho, C. C., Lin, H. L., Yang, C. H., & Lyu, Y. P. (2016). Productivity Catch‐up Between Chinese and Taiwanese Electronics Firms. Pacific Economic Review.
    Jung, M., & Lee, K. (2010). Sectoral systems of innovation and productivity catch-up: determinants of the productivity gap between Korean and Japanese firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1037-1069.
    Khalifah, N. A., & Adam, R. (2009). Productivity Spillovers from FDI in Malaysian Manufacturing: Evidence from Micro‐panel Data. Asian Economic Journal, 23(2), 143-167.
    Samad, K. E. A. Q. (2013). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies of wheat farmers under different technologies. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 3(9), 933.
    Kokko, A., & Thang, T. T. (2014). Foreign direct investment and the survival of domestic private firms in Viet Nam. Asian Development Review.
    Le, H. Q., & Pomfret, R. (2011). Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in Vietnam: horizontal or vertical spillovers?. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 16(2), 183-201.
    Thuy, L. T. (2005). Technological spillovers from foreign direct investment: The case of Vietnam. School of Economics, University of Tokyo: School of Economics.
    Lipsey, R. E. (2004). Home-and host-country effects of foreign direct investment. In Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics (pp. 333-382). University of Chicago Press.
    Jung, M., Lee, K., Fukao, K., & Kwon, H. U. (2008). Total Factor Productivity of the Korean Firms and Catching up with the Japanese Firms/Comments and Discussion. Seoul Journal of Economics, 21(1), 93.
    Nguyen, A. N., & Nguyen, T. (2008). Foreign direct investment in Vietnam: Is there any evidence of technological spillover effects.
    O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. P., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical economics, 34(2), 231-255.
    Takii, S. (2009). Multinationals, technology upgrading, and wages in urban and rural Indonesia. Review of Development Economics, 13(1), 151-163.
    Van Thanh, H., & Hoang, P. T. (2010). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: the case of Vietnam. Causes and Consequences of Globalization in East Asia: What Do the Micro Data Analyses Show.
    Yang, C. H. (2009). Technological sources and regional productivity growth in China. China Economic Journal, 2(1), 73-92.
    Yang, C.H. and Chiu, C.Y. (2016), Vietnam’s Aggregate Productivity Growth after Ownership Deregulation: 2000-2008, Mimeo.
    Yang C.H., Lin C.C and Chiu C.Y. (2016), Techinological Catching-up between Two ASEAN Members and China: A Metafrontier Approach, Mimeo
    Yang, S. F., Chen, K. M., & Huang, T. H. (2013). Outward foreign direct investment and technical efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing firms. Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 7-17.

    QR CODE
    :::