因應供應鏈之間激烈的競爭，國內資訊電子業不但導入企業資源規劃以整合其內部企業流程，更導入跨組織資訊系統以便與外部夥伴，包括供應商、協力廠和客戶之間能緊密連結，以改善跨組織企業流程的協調和效率。
在供應鏈管理的跨組織資訊系統文獻中，大部分在探討中心廠的績效，對於整體供應鏈網路績效甚少著墨。Struab等在2004發表以六個理論為基礎的網路組織績效模型，並以兼顧程度和對稱性的資訊分享和組織依賴關係來衡量一對一的供應鏈網路組織績效。本研究即採用Straub 等的研究模式和資料分析方法，以國內的資訊電子業為對象，透過問卷調查探討中心廠和供應商間程度對稱的資訊分享和組織依賴關係與供應鏈網路績效的關係。研究結果發現，程度對稱的資訊分享和組織相賴關係不但顯著地正向影響一對一的供應鏈網路組織績效，兩者間的互動分析進一步顯示高程度對稱的資訊分享所帶來的網路組織績效始終高於低程度對稱的資訊分享所帶來的網路組織績效，其差異在相賴程度低的情況下更加顯著。

To cope with the severe competition between supply chains, the domestic IT industry not only employs enterprise resource planning to integrate internal business processes, but also introduces inter-organizational system (IOS) to tightly linked to various partners including vendors, suppliers and clients to improve coordination and efficiency of inter-organizational business processes.
While prior studies of the IOS in SCM have examined the benefits of network leaders from these systems, little attention has been paid to the performance of the supply chain as a whole. To measure the performance of a supply chain, Struab et al. (2004) proposed a nomology of networked organizational performance (NetOP) based on six theories. They successfully established that degree symmetric information sharing and degree symmetric interdependence positively affected the performance of the dyadic supply network. This study adopts the research model and data analysis of Straub et al., regards domestic IT industry as the target, examines the relationship between the degree symmetric information sharing and interdependence and NetOP. The results show that degree symmetric information sharing and interdependence not only positively affect the performance of the dyadic supply network, the interaction between the two antecedents reveals that high degree symmetric information sharing always leads to higher performance than low degree symmetric information sharing, and the difference is more significant when the degree symmetric interdependence is low..

中文部份
1. 李信賢，信任對跨組織資訊系統使用的影響—B計畫供應商觀點，國立中央大學資訊管理系碩士論文，民九十三年六月。
2. 何琇雯，影響企業採用「供應商管理存貨」因素之探討－以資訊電子業為例，中原大學資訊管理系碩士論文，民九十二年六月。
3. 張定原，王存國，范錚強，「供應鏈成員參與跨組織合作計劃因素之研究」，資訊管理研究，第三卷，第二期，2001年。
4. 張保隆，蔡千姿，台灣產業技術發展策略之概念模式－以電子業為個案之研究，2001。
5. 陳銘崑，供應鏈管理，2004年9月二版，p24。
6. 黃威智，信任與關係承諾對供應鏈組織耦合度的影響：以資訊產業為例， 2002。
7. 黃思明，黃明達，范錚強，D計畫效益評估，2003。
8. 趙子仲，跨組織資訊系統採用及擴展因素之研究，國立中央大學資訊管理系碩士論文，民九十三年六月。
9. 楊翰林，應用Web Services實施企業間電子化之比較研究─以電子製造業為例，中原大學資訊管理系碩士論文，民九十三年七月。
10. 廖信榮，企業導入跨組織資訊系統進行電子整合之影響因素研究，南台科技大學資訊管理所碩士論文，民九十三年六月。
11. 經濟部技術處，「經濟部AB計畫報告書」，2003。
12. DigiTimes企業IT-耿慧茹，小型物流業者e化，http://office.digitimes.com.tw/，2006/05/01。
13. 王凱，吳心恬，跨組織資訊系統建置採用之影響因素探討，http://free.greenworld.com.tw/~anitawu/ios.html，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，2006/05/01。
14. 黃仁德、姜樹翰，台灣電價制度的之探討，政治大學經濟學研究所，http://www.moea.gov.tw/~ecobook/season/sag5_2/sag2-a2.htm，2006/5/1。
15. 資訊業電子化計畫 (AB計畫)及金、物流及協同設計計畫(CDE計畫) – 神達維他命計畫http://www.mitac.com/micweb/Publish，2006/05/01。
16. 電子商務研究-李珺晴，關於網路外部性的一些基本概念，http://www.dzsw.org/，2006/05/01。
17. 經濟部，經濟部網站http://doit.moea.gov.tw/news，2006/5/1。
18. 維基百科，經濟學外部效應http://zh.wikipedia.org/，2006/05/01。
英文部份
1. Back, W. Edward & Bell, Lansford C., "Quantifying Benefits Attributable to Electronic Technologies," American Association of Cost Engineers Transaction, 1994 Transactions, pp. SI11-SI16. 1994.
2. Banerjee, and Sriram, “The Impact of Electronic Data Interchange on Purchasing: An Empirical Investigation,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 29-38, 1995.
3. Barrett, S. and Konsynski, B., "Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems," MIS Quarterly/Special Issue 6, pp.93-105, 1982.
4. Cash, J. I. and Konsynski, B. R., "IS Redraws Competitive Boundaries," Harvard Business Review, Mar/Apr, pp.134-142, 1985.
5. DeLone, W., and McLean, E. “Information systems success: The quest for the dependentvariable.” Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No.1, pp.60–95, 1992.
6. Gover. V, “An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 603-639, 1993.
7. Gulati, R and J Garino, “Get the right mix of bricks & clicks”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 107-114, 2000.
8. Johnston, H.R. and Vitale, M.R.,"Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information System," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No.2, pp.153-165, 1988.
9. Konsynski, B. R. and McFarlan, F. “Information partnerships-shared data, shared scale.” Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct, pp.114-120, 1990.
10. Kumar, K, and van Diessel, H.G, “Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.3, pp.279-300, 1996.
11. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. “Information distortion supply chain: The bullwhip effect.” Management Science, Vol. 43, No.4, pp. 546-558, 1997.
12. Min, H, and Galle, W.P, “E-purchasing: profiles of adopters and noadopters,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 32, pp. 227-233, 2003.
13. Minnesota Minneapolis,”How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relatoinships,” MIS Quarterly Vol. 28, No.1, pp. 45-73, 2004.
14. Premkumar, G., and Ramamurthy, K., “The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems,” Decision sciences, Vol. 26, No.3, pp. 303-335, 1995.
15. Premkumar, G., Ramanurthy, K., and Nilakanta, S.,"Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective," Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 11, No.2, pp.157-186. 1994.
16. Riggins, F.J. and Mukhopadhyay, T.,"Interdependent Benefits form Interorganizational System: Opportunities for Business Partner Reenginerring," Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.37-57. 1994.
17. Rohlfs, J. “A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communication Service,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 5, pp. 16-37, 1974.
18. Soliman, K.S,”Internet-based Business-to-Business electronic commerce: A CIO’s perspective,” Information Systems Management, winter, pp. 35-41, 2003.
19. Sriram, Ven & Banerjee, Snehamay, "Electronic Data Interchange: Does Its Adoption Change Purchasing Policies and Procedures?" International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, winter, pp. 31-40. 1994.
20. Straub, Arun Rai, and Richard Klein, ”Measuring Firm Performance at the network Level: A Nomology of the Business Impact of Digital Supply Networks,” Journal of management information systems, Vol21, No.1, pp83-114, 2004.
21. Subramani,”How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relatoinships,” MIS Quarterly vol. 28, No.1, 2004.
22. Suomi, Reima, "What to Take in Account When Building an Inter-Organizational Information system," Information Processing & Management, Vol.30, No.1, pp. 151-159. 1994.
23. Udo, Gdwin J. & Pickett, Gary C., "EDI Conversion Manadate: The Big Problem for Small Businesses," Industrial Management, Mar/Apr, pp. 6-9. 1994.
24. Varian, H. and C. Shapiro “Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge,” Harvard Business School Press. 1998.
25. Vlosky, Richard P., Smith, Paul M. & Wilsion, David T., "Electronic Data Interchange Implementation Strategies: A Case Study," Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, pp. 5-18. 1994.
26. Werbach, K, "Syndication: the emerging model for business in the internet era," Harvard Business Review, pp.85-93, 2000.
27. Wey, Jason Y. J. & Gibson, David V., "Influence of the External Environment on Interorganizational Systems: An Intergration of Transaction Costs and Resource Dependence Perspectives," Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 501-507, 1991.