| 研究生: |
吳怡娟 Yi-Juan Wu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
專案管理與統包BIM工作交付項目與審查方式之研究 A Study of BIM Deliverables and Review Methods for Professional Construction Management and Design/Build Contracts |
| 指導教授: | 楊智斌 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木系營建管理碩士班 Master's Program in Construction Management, Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 141 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 建築資訊建模 、建築工程 、BIM交付項目 、審查方式 、專案管理 、統包 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Building Information Modelling (BIM), Building Construction Project, BIM Deliverable, Review Method, Professional Construction Management (PCM), Design-Build (DB) |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:17 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,國內公共工程已開始應用建築資訊建模(Building Information Modeling, BIM)技術以提升其品質。BIM的導入,不僅讓工程師可於專案早期進行模擬,協助處理於不同階段之工作衝突,亦為營建產業帶來分析技術與工作流程的變革。但國內應用BIM技術環境尚未成熟,加上實際操作經驗仍在持續累積中、BIM作業規範不明確及建模標準定義不清,使業主未明確訂定BIM交付方式或交付項目內容範疇模糊,而導致契約雙方對履約內容理解不一致,易造成履約爭議,且無法達成應用BIM之效益。為使執行BIM相關參與者能更正確使用BIM技術,本研究經彙整分析國內既有的BIM作業指引及契約範本中的BIM特定條款,進而歸納契約之共通性目的及適用於建築工程之通用性BIM特定條款,以供執行單位於擬定BIM契約時參考使用。此外,針對國內專案管理及統包契約中BIM工作交付項目及審查方式,本研究亦提出通案性BIM交付項目及所對應之BIM成果審查方式,以利日後擬訂契約時參考。期望本研究之成果,除可減少日後應用BIM發生履約爭議外,亦可提高業主應用BIM的意願。
Recently, public construction works have begun to implement Building Information Modeling (BIM) technique for better construction quality. Implementing BIM not only enables engineers to solve work conflicts at the early stage of a project, but also leads a revolution on analysis technique and workflows in the construction industry. However, BIM implementation in Taiwan is at a start-up stage due to an immature environment, it encounters a lot of problems including limited accumulated experience by practice, the ambiguity of BIM related specifications in contracts and lack of BIM standards. This makes the owner being incapable of defining clear BIM deliverables or producing BIM deliverables with vague scope of work. Consequently, unreasonable BIM contract clauses result in inconsistent understanding of BIM applications between the client and the contractor, being prone to contract disputes and being unable to achieve BIM implementation benefits. For making BIM implementation stakeholders performing works in a better way, this study analyzes the BIM related clauses and specifications from BIM guidelines and model contract templates to summarize common BIM objectives and particular conditions for Professional Construction Management (PCM) and Design-Build (DB) Contracts. Furthermore, this study also proposes a set of BIM deliverables and review methods for PCM and DB Contracts based on intensive reviews of collected cases. It is anticipated that the research outcomes can decrease contract disputes in BIM implementation, and increase the client’s willingness to implement BIM technique in the future.
1. Abdirad, H. (2015). Advancing in Building Information Modeling (BIM) contracting: Trends in the AEC/FM Industry.
2. Chuck Eastman , Paul Teicholz , & Rafael Sacks (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors.
3. Doumbouya, L., Gao, G., & Guan, C. (2016). Adoption of the Building Information Modeling (BIM) for construction project effectiveness: The review of BIM benefits. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 4(3), 74-79.
4. Fadeyi, M. O. (2017). The role of building information modeling (BIM) in delivering the sustainable building value. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(2), 711-722.
5. Forsythe, P. (2014). The case for BIM uptake among small construction contracting businesses. Paper presented at the ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.
6. Maas, G. (2014). The implementation of BIM In a large European construction company. Paper presented at the ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.
7. The American Institute of Architects, A. (2008). AIA Document E202-2008 Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit.
8. Wong, K. d.& Fan, Q. (2013). Building information modelling (BIM) for sustainable building design. Facilities, 31(3/4), 138-157.
9. 王明德, 張陸滿, & 蔡奇成(2013),建築資訊模型之法律議題初探,建築學報(84),第 185-203 頁。
10. 交通部鐵路改建工程局(2018),規劃、設計及施工 階段導入BIM契約文件範本。
11. 交通部鐵道局(2018),鐵道工程BIM作業指引: 交通部鐵道局委託計畫。
12. 李仲昀(2017a),淺談導入建築資訊建模BIM應用的契約問題與因應對策,國內BIM經驗分享 -上-,第 125-136 頁。
13. 李仲昀(2017b),業主對BIM指引的期待,土木水利,44(4),第10-17頁。
14. 李仲昀(2018),BIM 技術應用與公共工程管理之整合實務。
15. 林郁珊(2013),基於建築資訊建模的期初設計流程個案探討,國立臺灣科技大學建築系,台北市。
16. 邱垂德, 劉得廣, 余文德, & 劉沈榮(2014),台灣地區現行BIM專案之交付成果探討,營建管理季刊(99),第 35-54 頁。
17. 邱垂德,鄭紹材,余文德,劉得廣,曾楷婷,&張育晧(2015),我國 BIM 協同作業指南之研訂—設計與施工階段資訊交換:內政部建築研究所委託研究計劃。
18. 范素玲(2017),BIM契約議題探討,土木水利, 44(4),第 54-58 頁。
19. 范素玲& 謝尚賢(2016),國內BIM契約問題探討與建議,營建知訊(399),第 50-59 頁。
20. 張南薰(2014),工程完工、驗收與報酬請求權關係之研究,高大法學論叢, 10(1),第 77-81+83+85-119+121-125 頁。
21. 許俊逸, 徐景文, 林傑, & 李文欽(2014),BIM 帶來的變革與政府的前瞻作為, 87(5),第 2-9 頁。
22. 陳建忠, 余文德, 邱垂德, 鄭紹材, & 賴朝俊(2017),台灣BIM指南之研擬,土木水利, 44(4),第 26-38 頁。
23. 陳桂茂(2017),建築工程BIM竣工模型驗收模式之研究,國立臺北科技大學土木工程系土木與防災碩士班(碩士在職專班),台北市。
24. 臺大BIM研究中心(2017),業主 BIM 實施方針之擬定指引 (2017版): 臺大土木工程資訊模擬與管理研究中心。
25. 謝尚賢(2015),BIM發展應用 業主角色關鍵,營建知訊(389),第 59-62 頁。
26. 羅元鴻(2017),探討BIM應用於施工圖說之研究,國立中央大學土木工程學系在職專班,桃園市。
27. 蘇柏仰(2017),營建工程評估選用BIM應用(BIM Uses) 架構與流程之研究,國立中央大學營建管理研究所,桃園市。