| 研究生: |
莊子賢 Tzu-Hsien Chuang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
元宇宙中的未來自我實踐式學習 Future Self-Oriented Practical Learning in the Metaverse |
| 指導教授: |
陳國棟
Gwo-Dong Chen |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 資訊工程學系 Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 109 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 情境認知理論 、元宇宙 、建構主義 、自我決定理論 、心理擁有感 、數位自我 、未來自我 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Situated Cognition theory, Metaverse, Constructionism, Self-determination theory, Psychological Ownership, Digital Self, Future self |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:20 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著沉浸式數位實境技術於教育領域的發展,多數現有學習系統仍由教師預設場景與角色,學生無法自由建構數位化身與學習情境,僅作為被動參與者進入既定內容,難以發揮自主性、建立心理擁有感,亦難投射其未來專業角色與學習責任。然而,學習系統若僅賦予學生建構的自由,卻未提供明確的目標引導與社會角色投射,學生的建構行為仍可能流於個人內在目標,難以連結其未來職責與外部利害關係人(如主管、顧客)之期待,亦無法有效激發其責任感與服務動機。
為回應上述挑戰,本研究設計一套「未來自我導向之元宇宙學習系統」 (FUSE Learning),結合生成式人工智慧與3D建模技術,引導學生自拍建構數位化身、自主設計未來職場環境與主管角色,撰寫個人願景,並於元宇宙中進行展演。系統端透過生成式人工智慧模擬虛擬主管的個別化評語與反應,建構具社會互動性的情境回饋,強化學生對未來自我的責任認同與動機內化。
本研究採準實驗設計,實證結果顯示實驗組在心理擁有感、學習動機與未來自我連續性皆顯著優於對照組,展演歷程亦呈現高度參與與專業投射。研究整合建構式學習、心理擁有感、自我決定理論與未來自我理論,提出一種融合個人建構與社會評價的沉浸式學習模式,為數位學習場域提出一種結合元宇宙技術與生成式人工智慧、並導向未來責任與動機內化的實踐進路。
As immersive digital reality technologies continue to evolve within the field of education, most existing learning systems remain constrained by teacher-predetermined scenes and roles. Students are often limited to passively participating in fixed content, lacking opportunities to autonomously construct digital avatars and learning environments. This restricts their sense of agency, psychological ownership, and the ability to project themselves into future professional roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, if a learning system merely grants students the freedom to construct content without providing clear goal-oriented guidance or social role projection, their creations may remain focused on internal personal goals. As a result, students struggle to connect with expectations from future stakeholders (e.g., supervisors, clients), thereby limiting the development of responsibility and prosocial motivation.
To address these challenges, this study proposes the Future-Self Enacted Learning in the Metaverse system (FUSE Learning), which integrates generative AI and 3D modeling technologies. The system guides students to create personalized digital avatars through selfies, design future workplace environments and supervisory figures, articulate personal visions, and present their projects within a metaverse context. Through generative AI, the system simulates personalized feedback and reactions from virtual supervisors, creating socially interactive evaluation scenarios that reinforce students’ sense of future role responsibility and internalized motivation.
A quasi-experimental design was adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the system. Results showed that students in the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher levels of psychological ownership, learning motivation, and future self-continuity compared to the control group. Their project presentations also reflected high levels of engagement and professional self-projection. By integrating constructionism theory, psychological ownership, self-determination theory, and future self theory, this study proposes an immersive learning model that combines personal construction and social evaluation, offering a practical approach to digital education that leverages metaverse technologies and generative AI to foster future-oriented responsibility and motivation internalization.
彭治揚 (2024)。 基於依附理論設計的多管道AI寵物機器人以維持長期學習參與並提升學習成效 國立中央大學資訊工程學系學位論文。
唐浩 (2024)。 使用者自定義之數位情境學習系統 國立中央大學資訊工程學系學位論文。
林孟衡 (2023)。 可融入使用者與實體物件之數位雙生實境學習系統 國立中央大學資訊工程學系學位論文。
黃招憲、郭德信、王淑麗 (2005)。餐旅日語(上)。致良出版社。
黃招憲、許惠端、王靖絜 (2010)。餐旅日語(下)。致良出版社。
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15381-15413.
Al Hakim, V. G., Yang, S. H., Liyanawatta, M., Wang, J. H., & Chen, G. D. (2022). Robots in situated learning classrooms with immediate feedback mechanisms to improve students' learning performance. Computers & Education, 182, 104483.
Alhebaishi, S., & Stone, R. (2024). Augmented Reality in Education: Revolutionizing Teaching and Learning Practices–State-of-the-Art. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(11).
Aitken, V. (2013). Dorothy Heathcote’s Mantle of the Expert approach to teaching and learning: A brief introduction. Connecting curriculum, linking learning, 34-56.
Alemneh, S., & Gebrie, G. (2024). The role of project-based learning in improving the writing ability and sub-writing abilities of 10th grade Amharic speaking students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100843.
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62(2), 229.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43.
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of consumer research, 40(3), 477-500.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. 1989, 18(1), 32-42.
Buchem, I. (2012, January). Psychological Ownership and Personal Learning Environments: Do sense of ownership and control really matter. In PLE Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Chen, G. D., Fan, C. Y., Chang, C. K., Chang, Y. H., & Chen, Y. H. (2018). Promoting autonomy and ownership in students studying English using digital comic performance-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 955-978.
Chen, Y. L., & Hsu, C. C. (2020). Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 154, 103910.
Chen, X., Lee, C., Hui, C., Lin, W., Brown, G., & Liu, J. (2023). Feeling possessive, performing well? Effects of job-based psychological ownership on territoriality, information exchange, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 403.
Chien, Y.-C. (2019). The Language of Massively Multiplayer Online Gamers: A Study of Vocabulary in Minecraft Gameplay. TESL-EJ, 23(3).
Chiu, C.-F. (2020). Facilitating K-12 teachers in creating apps by visual programming and project-based learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(1), 103-118.
Chiu, T. K. (2024). Using self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student STEM interest and identity development. Instructional Science, 52(1), 89-107.
Chung, W. Y., Kim, D., & Lee, D. (2024). What factors affect psychological ownership when creating an avatar?: Focusing on customization and the ideal self. Telematics and Informatics, 88, 102098.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge university press.
Dangol, A., & Dasgupta, S. (2023, June). Constructionist approaches to critical data literacy: A review. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (pp. 112-123).
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Dhillon, P. K. S., & Tinmaz, H. (2024). Immersive realities: a comprehensive guide from virtual reality to metaverse. Journal for the education of gifted young scientists, 12(1), 29-45.
Díaz, J., Saldaña, C., & Avila, C. (2020). Virtual world as a resource for hybrid education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(15), 94-109.
Duatepe-Paksu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2009). Effects of drama-based geometry instruction on student achievement, attitudes, and thinking levels. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 272-286.
Erbay, F., & Doğru, S. S. Y. (2010). The effectiveness of creative drama education on the teaching of social communication skills in mainstreamed students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4475-4479.
Falconer, L. (2013). Situated learning in virtual simulations: Researching the authentic dimension in virtual worlds. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(3), 285-300.
Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 6(1), 49-65.
Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. Tesol Quarterly, 51(1), 115-142.
González-Davies, M., & Raído, V. E. (2018). Situated learning in translator and interpreter training: Bridging research and good practice. In Situated Learning in translator and interpreter training (pp. 1-11). Routledge.
Gu, J., Wang, J., Guo, X., Liu, G., Qin, S., & Bi, Z. (2023). A metaverse-based teaching building evacuation training system with deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4), 2209-2219.
Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 127-141.
Heathcote, D., & Herbert, P. (1985). A drama of learning: Mantle of the expert. Theory into practice, 24(3), 173-180.
Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self‐system: Possible selves, self‐regulation, and behavior. Journal of personality, 74(6), 1673-1696.
Hooi, R., & Cho, H. (2014). Avatar-driven self-disclosure: The virtual me is the actual me. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 20-28.
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M. T., Ballard, K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Knutson, B. (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision making, 4(4), 280-286.
Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self‐continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 30-43.
Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. Y. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263-276.
Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, H. S. (2013). Users’ familiar situational contexts facilitate the practice of EFL in elementary schools with mobile devices. Computer assisted language learning, 26(2), 101-125.
Hwang, G. J., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082.
Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students' interest, ownership, and motivation. The University of Texas at Austin.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of personality and social psychology, 91(1), 188.
Oyserman, D., & Destin, M. (2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(7), 1001-1043.
Pan, A. J., Lai, C. F., & Kuo, H. C. (2023). Investigating the impact of a possibility-thinking integrated project-based learning history course on high school students' creativity, learning motivation, and history knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101214.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. In: Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism: research reports and essays, 1985-1990. Ablex publishing corporation.
Pataranutaporn, P., Winson, K., Yin, P., Lapapirojn, A., Ouppaphan, P., Lertsutthiwong, M., ... & Hershfield, H. E. (2024, October). Future you: a conversation with an AI-generated future self reduces anxiety, negative emotions, and increases future self-continuity. In 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Peck, J., & Luangrath, A. W. (2023). A review and future avenues for psychological ownership in consumer research. Consumer psychology review, 6(1), 52-74.
Pellas, N., Kazanidis, I., & Palaigeorgiou, G. (2020). A systematic literature review of mixed reality environments in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2481-2520.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of management review, 26(2), 298-310.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of general psychology, 7(1), 84-107.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Rahman, H., Wahid, S. A., Ahmad, F., & Ali, N. (2024). Game-based learning in metaverse: Virtual chemistry classroom for chemical bonding for remote education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19595-19619.
Resnick, M. (1996, July). Distributed constructionism. In Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 280-284).
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., ... & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67.
Ritterbusch, G. D., & Teichmann, M. R. (2023). Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review. Ieee Access, 11, 12368-12377.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101802.
Slattery, E. J., Butler, D., O’Leary, M., & Marshall, K. (2023). Primary school students’ experiences using Minecraft Education during a national project-based initiative: An Irish study. TechTrends, 1-13.
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Routledge.
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (2012). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Routledge.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277.
Koumpouros, Y. (2024). Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 2.
Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 18.
Lan, Y.-J. (2020). Immersion into virtual reality for language learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 72, pp. 1-26). Elsevier.
Lee, J., & Suh, A. (2015). How do virtual community members develop psychological ownership and what are the effects of psychological ownership in virtual communities?. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 382-391.
Lee, N., & Jo, M. (2023). Exploring problem-based learning curricula in the metaverse: The hospitality students' perspective. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 32, 100427.
Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Zhou, P. Y., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., ... & Hui, P. (2024). All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda. Foundations and trends® in human-computer interaction, 18(2–3), 100-337.
Loyens, S. M., Van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem-and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 39.
Mao, Y., Tang, J., Wang, W., & Cheng, L. (2023, March). The Impact of Online Creative Classroom Environment on Students’ Creativity: A Case Study Based on Online Scratch Visual Programming. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 349-353). IEEE.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American psychologist, 41(9), 954.
Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269-308.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of management review, 26(2), 298-310.
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
Vasiliene-Vasiliauskiene, V., Vasiliauskas, A. V., & Sabaityte, J. (2020). Peculiarities of educational challenges implementing project-based learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(2), 136-149.
WAnG, Q. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138-1146.
Wang, Y., Wang, H., Wang, S., Wind, S. A., & Gill, C. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-determination-theory-based interventions in the education context. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102015.
White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103247.
Wood, C. M. (2003). The effects of creating psychological ownership among students in group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 240-249.
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., Lee, M., Sanusi, I. T., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2022). A self-determination theory (SDT) design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education. Computers & education, 189, 104582.
Yang, Y. F., Hsieh, W. M., Wong, W. K., Hong, Y. C., & Lai, S. C. (2024). Reducing students’ foreign language anxiety to improve English vocabulary learning in an online simulation game. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 410-432.
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285-312.
Yuerong, L., Na, M., Xiaolu, Y., & Alam, S. S. (2024). Self-determination and perceived learning in online learning communities. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24538.
Zhang, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, L., Xu, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2021). Psychological ownership: A meta-analysis and comparison of multiple forms of attachment in the workplace. Journal of Management, 47(3), 745-770.
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1202728.