跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳昭毅
Chao-Yi Wu
論文名稱: 透地雷達在航道舖面檢測之應用
指導教授: 楊潔豪
Chieh-Hou Yang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 地球科學學院 - 應用地質研究所
Graduate Institute of Applied Geology
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 146
中文關鍵詞: 透地雷達航道鋪面
相關次數: 點閱:7下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 由於飛機起降滑行所造成負重及環境因素影響之下,機場航道之
    鋪面強度將逐漸減弱,損壞將逐漸形成,因此需藉由檢測工作確切了
    解鋪面強度現況及受損程度及受損位置,來提供航道損壞位置,進而
    有效執行維修工作,並提升鋪面使用年限。
    近年來透地雷達在台灣已開始應用於各種鋪面檢測上,效果相當
    不錯,故本研究主要探討之目的為:
    1. 以透地雷達分析剛性鋪面之厚度及可能之損壞淘空位置之分
    析鑑別。
    2. 探討平坦度調查、落重撓度儀調查、裂縫調查與透地雷達資料
    比較分析之異同。


    I 第一章緒論.................................................................................................1 1.1 研究動機與目的.......................................................................1 1.2 文獻回顧...................................................................................2 1.3 本文內容...................................................................................3 第二章透地雷達基本原理.........................................................................4 2.1 電磁波特性及地層電性.......................................................4 2.2 介質電性................................................................................6 2.3 低損耗介質中之電磁波特性...............................................8 2.4 地層之速度分析方式...........................................................13 第三章透地雷達作業概述.........................................................................18 3.1 儀器選擇................................................................................18 3.2 野外探測................................................................................22 3.2.1 野外施測方式.................................................................22 3.2.2 測線配置.........................................................................24 3.2.3 野外施測參數.................................................................26 3.3 資料處理................................................................................31 3.4 現場調查規劃原則................................................................32 第四章航道鋪面破壞位置彙整及厚度分析............................................35 4.1 北場........................................................................................36 4.1.1 北跑道(05-23).................................................................36 4.1.2 滑行道(N1~N11)............................................................52 4.1.3 滑行道(NP).....................................................................63 4.1.4 滑行道(NC) ....................................................................67 4.1.5 停機坪.............................................................................72 4.2 南場........................................................................................78 4.2.1 南跑道(06-24).................................................................78 4.2.2 滑行道(S1~S8) ...............................................................98 4.2.3 滑行道(SP) .....................................................................106 4.2.4 滑行道(SC) .....................................................................114 4.2.5 滑行道(SS) .....................................................................117 4.3 聯絡滑行道............................................................................121 4.3.1 聯絡滑行道(EC).............................................................121 4.3.2 聯絡滑行道(WC) ...........................................................124 4.4 鋪面厚度分析........................................................................130 第五章相關檢測方法與透地雷達資料比較分析....................................135 5.1 平坦度調查...............................................................................135 5.2 裂縫調查...................................................................................137 5.3 落重撓度儀調查.......................................................................139 5.4 綜合比較分析...........................................................................141 第六章結論.................................................................................................144 參考文獻........................................................................................................146


    Annan, A. P., and Davis, J. L., 1976,Impluse radar sounding permafrost: Radio
    Science, 11, 383-394.
    Annan, A. P., and Davis, J.L., 1977, Radar range analysis for geological
    materials: Geological Survey of Canada, Report of Activities Part B:
    GSC Paper 77-1B.
    Bae, S.H., Kim, H.S. and Yoon, W.S., 1996, Case studies on the application of
    ground penetrating radar technology in detection of underground utilities
    and structure safety diagnosis: 6th International Conference on Ground
    Penetrating Radar, 462-472.
    Grandjean, G., and Goury, J. C., 1996, GPR data processing for 3D
    fracture mapping in a marble quarry (Thassos, Greece): Journal of
    applied geophysics, 36,19~30.
    Grasmueck, M., 1996, 3-D ground penetrating radar applied to fracture
    imaging in gneiss: Geophysics, 61, 1050-1064.
    Davis, J., and Annan, A. P., 1989, Ground penetrating radar for
    high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy: Geophys.
    Prosp., 7, p.531-551.
    Davis, J., Les, Rossiter, J.R., Mesher, Darel E., and Dawley, Cece B., 1992,
    Road Radar Ltd, 14535-118 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,
    319-332.
    Sensors & Software Inc., 1996, GPR frequency selection, EKKO Update,
    October, 1996.
    Sensors & Software Inc., 1996, GPR sounding in water, EKKO Update,
    October, 1996.
    Sensor & Software Inc., 1996, Pulse EKKO 100 Run, User’s Guide. Version
    1.2.
    Sensors & Software Inc., 1996, Pulse EKKO 1000 Run, User’s Guide. Version
    1.2.
    Smith, D. G., and Jol, H. M., 1992, GPR investigation of a lake Bonneville
    delta, Prove level, Brigham City, Utah: Geology, 1083-1086.
    Ulriksen, C.P.F., 1982, Application of impulse radar to civil engineering: Ph.D.
    thesis, Dept of Eng. Geol., Lund Univ. of Tech., Sweden, 175p.
    Lau, C.L., Scullion, T., and Chan, P., 1992, Using ground penetrating radar
    technology for pavement evaluations in Texas, USA: Geological Survey
    of Finland: Special Paper 16, 277-284.
    Parry, N. S. and Davis, J. L., 1992, GPR systems for roads and bridge:
    Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 16, 247-257.
    Weil, G.J., 1992, Non-destructive testing of bridge, Highway and airport
    pavements: Geological Survey of Finland: Special Paper 16, 259-266.
    Maser, K., 1992, Highway speed radar for pavement and bridge deck evaluation:
    Fourth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 1992,
    Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 16, p. 267-276.
    楊潔豪、陳兆年、王仲宇、林銘郎,1997,透地雷達探測技術與其在土木
    工程上之非破壞檢測應用:檢測科技, v.15, n.3, 109-119。
    廖國彰,1993,透地雷達應用於淺地層之個案分析,國立中央大學地球物
    理研究所碩士論文,82 頁。
    楊潔豪、廖國彰,1994,透地雷達探測與應用,地質,14, 115-128。
    Scullion, T., Lau, C.L., and Chen, Y., 1994, Implementation of the Texas ground
    penetrating radar system: Texas transportation institute, research report
    1233-1, 84p.
    Saarenketo, T., and Scullion, T., 1994, Ground penetrating radar applications on
    roads and highways: Texas transportation institute, research report
    1923-2F, 37p.
    Dix, C. H., 1955, Seismic velocities from surface measurements: Geophysics,
    20, 68-86.
    Greaves, R. J., Lesmes, D. P., Lee, J. M., and Toksoz, 1996, Velocity
    variations and water content estimated from multi-offset ground
    penetrating radar, 61, 683-695.
    Annan, A. P., 1992, Ground penetrating radar workshop notes, Sensors &
    Software Inc.
    洪翊翔,1995,透地雷達法及地電法於淺層構造調查之研究,國立中
    央大學應用地質研究所碩士論文,共89 頁。
    周志國,1994,透地雷達法於地下水調查之研究,國立中央大學應用
    地質研究所碩士論文,共175 頁。
    楊潔豪等,1999,透地雷達在公路鋪面上之應用與其模擬研究(一)
    (二),交通部科技顧問室。

    QR CODE
    :::