| 研究生: |
邱正陽 Cheng-Yang Chiu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
國際移動力-溝通力探討 |
| 指導教授: | 蕭嘉璋 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 數學系 Department of Mathematics |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 64 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 國際移動力 、溝通力 、英文能力 、學業成就 、大學學科能力測驗 、學測英文 、多重對應分析 、多因素分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Global Mobility, Communication, English Ability, Academic Achievement, General Scholastic Ability Test(GSAT), GSAT English Scores, MCA, MFA |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:14 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著科技日新月異,世界成為地球村,為了可以跟國際社會接軌,提升競爭力是必要的,國際移動力為最近熱門議題,我們可以藉由提升國際移動力,讓我們在社會中更具競爭性,然而國際移動力主要可以分為四部份探討,溝通力、專業力、實踐力及適應力,其中溝通力又為國際移動力中的最為基本的能力,本研究將會以溝通力(英文能力)為探討的主題。
探討英文能力的同時我們也會與學業成就做為比較,其中我們發現幾個較為重要的結果(一)預測中央大學全體學生的學業成就,學測英文的預測能力比學測國文、學測數學較佳,然而理工學系的同學也是一樣的結果,(二)學測總級分、學測英文、大一英文、學業成就(GPA)都會影響到學生的畢業時的英文能力(英檢等級),其中影響畢業時英文能力的主要因素還是入學前的英文能力(學測英文)為主要因素,(三)學業成就與英文能力有顯著的關係,其中英文學業成就與英文能力的關係更為顯著,有了這三個發現可以讓我們更有效的提升學生的英文能力,進而提升中央大學學生的國際移動力。
With the rapid development of science and technology,the world is becoming a global village.Thus ,it is necessary to enhance the global competitiveness. Global Mobility has been a key issue recently. As a result,we can become more competitive by enhancing Global Mobility.We can divide Global Mobility into four ablities: communication,expertise,practice and adaptation. Among these four abilities, communication is regarded as the fundamental skill. Therefore,this research focuses on discussing communication (that is English ability).
In order to improve the Global Mobility of students at NCU, we make comparison between students’academic achievement and English ability.We found out three important results through this research. First, among the scores of Chinese,English and Mathematics of the General Scholastic Ability Test(GSAT),there is a high correlation between students’GSAT,English score and their academic achievement at NCU,compared to their chinese and Mathmatics score. The above-mentioned result is the same for the students of College of Science, and College of Engineer.Second,the factors that influence students’English proficiency at college level include GSAT total scores,GSAT English scores,Freshman English scores and GPA,Furthermore,there is a significantly high correlation between GSAT English score and their English proficiency at college level.Third, there is a positive relationship between language proficiency and academic achievement. There is a significantly high correlation between English proficiency and English academic achievement.
[1]世界公民文化中心。About us,世界公民電子報取自http://www.core-corner.com/Web/About.php
[2]何萬順、周祝英、蘇紹雯、蔣侃學、陳郁萱(2013)。我國大學英語畢業門檻政策之檢討。教育政策論壇,16(3),1-30。
[3]陳超明(2013)。下一波的國民競爭力:國際移動力與跨文化思維教師天地 第183期,P.14 。
[4]田芳華、傅祖壇(2005)。數位落差與大學生學習:大學生數位落差相關因素與其對學業成就影響之探究。收錄於黃俊傑主編,二十一世紀大學教育的新挑戰 (頁 83-108)。台北:台大出版中心
[5]李文瑞(2003)。全國各大專校院普設英語畢業門檻標準之省思。英語教育電子月刊。取http://ejee.ncu.edu.tw/showarticles.asp?CO_no=612
[6]林力葦(2016)。影響大學生進修規劃之研究:以中央大學為例。
[7]廖熒虹(2010)。技專校院學生英語畢業門檻之態度初探。國立虎尾科技大學學報,29(3),41-60。
[8]戴浩一(2011)。「我國外語政策之檢討與展望」政策建議書。P7~P12。
[9]潘靖瑛(2014)。慈濟大學學生對英文畢業門檻的態度與因應策略之調查研究。
[10]沈凡筠(2015)。大學生時間管理與學業成就之研究。
[11]蘇紹雯(2005)。英語畢業門檻相關規定之需求分析:技職大學生的看法。教育學刊,24,47-66
[12]蘇紹雯(2009)。英語畢業門檻相關規定之研究:南部技職校院英語教師觀點。 高雄師大學報,27,37-60。
[13]蘇綉惠、林翠英(2008)。大一英語能力安置測驗之實施成效探討 ----以某科技大學為例。
[14]教育部(2016)。提升青年學生全球移動力計畫。P.7。
[15]教育部(2015)。教育部提升全球移動力,厚植青年軟實力,天下雜誌取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5072554
[16]行政院(2008)。挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫總結報告
[17]Burgess, T.and Greis, N.(1970). English language proficiency and academic achievement among students of English as a second language at the college level. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED074812)
[18]Benzecri(1992)Correspondence Analysis Handbook. New York: Marcel Decker.p412
[19]Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[20] Latif F. A. and Robertson A. S. (2001)。“Can selection assessments predict students’ achievements in the premedical year?: A study at a Rabian Gulf University,” Education for Health, 14:2, pp. 277-286.
[21]Garcia-Vazquez, E., Vazquez, L. A., Lopez, I. C. and Ward, W. (1997). Language proficiency and academic success: Relationships between proficiency in two languages and achievement among Mexican American students. Bilingual Research Journal, 21(4), 334 – 347.
[22]Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and 13 literature (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23]Maleki, A., & Zangani, E. (2007). A survey on the relationship between English language proficiency and the academic achievement of Iranian EFL students. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 86-96.
[24]Multiple Factor Analysis(MFA)Hervé Abdi1 & Dominique Valentin
[25]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_factor_analysis
[26]Rahbar M. H., et al. (2001)。“Predictability of Medical Students' Performance at the Aga Khan University from Admission Test Scores, Interview Ratings and Systems of Education.” Medical Education, 35, pp. 374-380.
[27]Rahman Sahragard& Afsaneh Baharloo(2009)A Closer Look at the Relationship between Academic Achievement and Language Proficiency among Iranian EFL Students.
[28]Smittle, P. (1995);。“Academic Performance Predictors for Community College Student Assessment.” Community College Review, 23:2
[29]Yen, S. C. & Hsin, C. A. (2006). Taiwan undergraduates’ attitudes toward graduation ELP benchmark: A pilot study. 陸軍官校八十二週年校慶暨三軍官校基礎學術研討會論文集,pp. FL73-FL89),5月26日。