| 研究生: |
王翔毅 Shiang-Yi Wang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
戲劇式學習之利他社群平台 Drama Based Learning : A Social Networking Sites Toward The Altruism |
| 指導教授: |
陳國棟
Gwo-Dong Chen |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 資訊工程學系 Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 83 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 利他動機 、利他行為 、社群網站 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Altruistic motives, Altruistic behaviors, Social networking sites |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:8 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在升學至上的學習環境下,大部分的學生通常只在乎自己學得好不好,很少主動會去幫助其他學生學習,教師在課堂上也較少有關於利他的活動設計,在班級上難以興起一個互助助人的利他風氣。然而,隨著社群網站的興起,我們看到在同個群組中,有著共同目標的使用者主動分享資訊給他人,這些動作不完全只是為了自己,同時也幫助了他人。
有鑑於此,本研究提出一個結合社群的利他學習平台,平台以分組的方式呈現學生在課堂上的學習作品,由於學生可以在課後互相觀摩彼此的作品並給予回饋,而產生反思與學習的效果。與其他社群平台不同的是,我們配合教師的教學設計,並有班級經營的概念,學生透過平台上的利他機制,在班級上提升利他風氣。
我們實際將系統導入某國小,做為期一年的實驗,對象是以英文為第二外語的五年級學生,並根據英文教材設計每一課的教學活動。教學活動分為MiniPlay情境學習、Learning Mosaic小組活動和利他平台的觀摩學習。MiniPlay和Learning Mosaic為課堂上的活動,學生根據活動產出個人和小組的學習作品,並在課後到利他平台進行觀摩學習。
教師表示利他平台上的觀摩學習,學生可以藉由觀摩彼此的作品而達到學習的效果。此外,利他平台的活動設計,讓小組內互助的風氣有提升,學生也有主動幫助其他組的行為發生。然而,學生表示回家後能使用電腦的時間大多都花在遊戲上,學生在利他平台上較不活躍,所以系統可能需要更多的經營策略來維持學生的長期使用。
In the current exam-oriented learning environment, most students only care themselves for learning better, they seldom help others. Teachers also design less activity based on altruism. Therefore, it is hard to rise an altruistic atmosphere in the classroom. With the rise of social networking sites, we found that users will share information for each other in the same group. Those are not entirely only for themselves, but also help others.
In the view of this, the study proposed a social e-learning networking sites toward the altruism. It presented students’ learning outcomes in the class by a grouping way. There is the effects of learning and self-reflection among students through observing others’ learning outcomes on sites after school. Compared to other social networking sites, we follow teaching design by teachers and system-design have the concept of classroom management. Through altruistic mechanism on the site, students enhance the altruistic atmosphere in the classroom.
The altruistic site is introduced to one of the primary school locally and used in formal curriculum of English as a second language for a whole year. Teaching activities are divided into learning cinema, audio comic and observation on altruistic site. Students produced learning outcomes in the classroom through learning cinema and audio comic activities, and then observed others’ learning outcomes after school on the altruistic site.
According to the participated teacher, they pointed out that students have a positive effects on learning through observational learning on the altruistic site. Besides that, it enhanced altruistic atmosphere in the same group effectively and students also have the initiative to help other students form different group by altruistic mechanism on altruistic site.
However, according to the participated students, they show less lively on altruistic site because they spent most of time on playing game after school. Therefore, the altruistic site may require more management strategies to maintain student’s long-term use.
英文文獻探討
[1] Shiu, H., Fong, J., & Lam, J. (2010). Facebook–education with social networking websites for teaching and learning. In Hybrid Learning (pp. 59-70). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[3] Seymour, B., Yoshida, W., & Dolan, R. (2009). Altruistic learning. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 3.
[4] Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153-172.
[5] Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation.Information & management, 45(1), 65-74.
[7] Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature,425(6960), 785-791.
[8] Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. J. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1601-1610.
[9] Vergeer, M., & Pelzer, B. (2009). Consequences of media and Internet use for offline and online network capital and well‐being. A causal model approach.Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 15(1), 189-210.
[10] Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
[11] Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Sese, F. J., & Urquizu, P. (2011). The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2224-2232.
[13] Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
[14] Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 68-73.
[15] Wang, C. H., & Chen, C. P. (2013). EFFECTS OF FACEBOOK TUTORING ON LEARNING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE.
[16] Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
[17] Brandtzæg, P. B., & Heim, J. (2008, January). User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful. InProceedings of the 2nd international conference on INtelligent TEchnologies for interactive enterTAINment (p. 11). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering).
[18] Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009, April). Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 945-954). ACM.
[19] Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?.Personality and individual differences, 52(3), 243-249.
[20] Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced sense of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database, 35(1), 64-79.
[21] Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 75-94.
[22] Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo‐sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555-566.
[23] Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
[24] Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263.
[25] Sangwan, S. (2005, January). Virtual community success: A uses and gratifications perspective. In System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 193c-193c). Ieee.
[26] Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science.
[27] De Wulf, K., Schillewaert, N., Muylle, S., & Rangarajan, D. (2006). The role of pleasure in web site success. Information & Management, 43(4), 434-446.
[28] Bourhis, A., & Dubé, L. (2010). ‘Structuring spontaneity’: investigating the impact of management practices on the success of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 175-193.
[29] Xu, B., & Li, D. (2015). An empirical study of the motivations for content contribution and community participation in Wikipedia. Information & Management, 52(3), 275-286.
[33] Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education,52(1), 35-44.
[34] Round, C. (2013). The best mooc provider: A review of coursera, udacity and edx. Web. http://www. skilledup. com/blog/the-best-mooc-provider-a-review-of-coursera-udacity-and-edx.
中文文獻探討
[2] 李汪翰.(2014)。朝向利他的學習作品集網路平台。
[30] 洪嘉培, & 袁心玫. (2001). 虛擬社群經營模式之探討—以優仕綱為例綱路與虛擬社群. 傳播與管理研究, 1(1), 45-71.
[31] 李其勳. (2011). 應用層級分析法於社群網站關鍵成功因素之研究—以 facebook 網站為例. 中原大學資訊管理研究所學位論文, 1-54.
網站文獻探討
[6] 有趣的倫理學-利他主義。取自
http://blog.roodo.com/ethics666/archives/2356898.html
[12] 社群網路服務。取自
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A4%BE%E4%BA%A4%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99
[32] eClass網上社群。取自
http://eclass.jtps.tyc.edu.tw/templates/
http://www.eclass.com.hk/index.php
[35] MIC研究報告-教育雲端服務平台—MOOC發展動態。取自
http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/reports/reportdetail_register.asp?docid=3026&rtype=freereport