| 研究生: |
廖明純 Ming-Chun Liao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業ESG表現對員工忠誠度的影響-以組織認同、心理安全感作為中介變項 |
| 指導教授: |
陳明園
Ming-Yuan Chen |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 56 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | ESG 、組織認同 、心理安全感 、員工忠誠度 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:26 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著全球永續浪潮興起與利害關係人資本主義的崛起,ESG(Environmental, Social and Governance)已成為評估企業永續經營與社會責任實踐的重要指標。企業除需對外展現其在環境保護、社會參與與治理透明方面的承諾外,更應將ESG理念內化為組織核心,強化內部治理與人力資本發展。然而,現有研究多聚焦於ESG對企業財務表現的影響,對其對員工心理與行為層面的影響機制尚缺乏深入探討。
本研究從組織行為與人力資源管理的觀點出發,探討企業ESG表現對員工忠誠度之影響,並以組織認同與心理安全感作為中介變項。透過網路問卷回收台灣在職員工樣本,共取得351份有效問卷。研究結果顯示:(1) ESG表現正向影響組織認同;(2) ESG表現正向影響心理安全感;(3) ESG表現正向影響員工忠誠度;(4) 組織認同與心理安全感在ESG與員工忠誠度之間具有中介效果。
In response to the rise of global sustainability and stakeholder capitalism, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) has become a key indicator of corporate sustainability and social responsibility. While most studies have focused on the financial impact of ESG, little attention has been paid to its influence on employees’ psychological and behavioral responses.
This study investigates the relationship between corporate ESG performance and employee loyalty from the perspective of organizational behavior and human resource management, introducing organizational identification and psychological safety as mediators. A total of 351 valid responses were collected from employees in Taiwan through an online survey. Results indicate that: (1) ESG performance positively affects organizational identification; (2) ESG performance positively affects psychological safety; (3) ESG performance positively affects employee loyalty; and (4) both organizational identification and psychological safety mediate the relationship between ESG performance and employee loyalty.
中文文獻
金融監督管理委員會(2014年)。<強制上市(櫃)特定公司編製企業社會責任報告書>
金融監督管理委員會(2023年)。<上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案。>
公司治理中心(TWSE).(2017年)。<臺灣指數公司與富時國際有限公司簽署合作契約,合編臺灣永續指數(FTSE4Good TIP Taiwan ESG Index),推動社會責任投資。>
經濟部產業發展署<企業永續倡議、準則與揭露框架。>
天下雜誌 (2025年2月)。<什麼是ESG?全面解析ESG核心定義、案例、檢測工具,一次讀懂ESG的行動指南>《CSR@天下》
英文文獻
Al-Shalabi, F. S. (2019). The relationship between organisational trust and organisational identification and its effect on organisational loyalty. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2019.10021076
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391122
Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(6), 709-729.
Choi, W.-S., Wang, W., Kim, H. J., Lee, J., & Kang, S.-W. (2024). Unraveling the link between perceived ESG and psychological well-being: The moderated mediating roles of job meaningfulness and pay satisfaction. Behavioral Sciences, 14(7), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070606
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Divya, S., & Christopher, B. P. (2024). A decadal review of organizational identification: Insights from bibliometric analysis and content analysis. Palgrave Communications, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02691-5
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(1), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304263849
Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2021). GRI standards. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
Hales, C., & Gough, O. (2003). Employee evaluations of company occupational pensions: HR implications. Personnel Review, 32(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310467643
Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150105
IFRS Foundation. (n.d.). IFRS Foundation., from https://www.ifrs.org/
Jin, M., & Kim, B. (2022). The effects of ESG activity recognition of corporate employees on job performance: The case of South Korea. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070316
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Kim, S. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). Employee perception of corporate social responsibility authenticity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 948363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948363
Laabs, J. J. (1996). Employee commitment. Personnel Journal, 75(8), 58–66.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.5465/256481
Mahran, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Shaping ESG commitment through organizational psychological capital: The role of CEO power. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4007
Mak, B. L., & Sockel, H. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivation and retention. Information & Management, 38(5), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00071-X
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
Oh, I.-S., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J.-H., Heo, C. G., & Shin, K.-H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta‐analytic comparison of the relationships of person–environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 99–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12026
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job. Prentice-Hall.
Perez Baez, C. A., & Remond, M. A. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration and organizational change: A multi-case study of investment companies [Master’s thesis, Malmö University]. DIVA Portal. https://mau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1664913
Pinder, C. C. (1984). Work motivation: Theory, issues, and applications. Prentice-Hall.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
Powers, E. L. (2000). Employee loyalty in the new millennium. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 65(3), 4–10.
Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278960
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). (2020). SASB standards: Sustainability accounting standards. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. from https://sasb.ifrs.org/standards/
Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, A. (2002). The theory of moral sentiments (K. Haakonssen, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1759)
Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4285694
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
Task Force on Climate‑related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (n.d.). Publications., from https://www.fsb‑tcfd.org/publications/
United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets
to a changing world. U.N. Global Compact. Retrieved June 26, 2025, from
https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf
UN PRI. (2006). Principles for Responsible Investment.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
Zhang, T., Zhang, J., & Tu, S. (2024). An empirical study on corporate ESG behavior and employee satisfaction: A moderating mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040274