台灣位於地震活動性高的區域，歷年來造成嚴重的人員與財產損失，例如2016年的美濃地震及2018年的花蓮地震。鑒於此，中央氣象局於全台灣設置了八百多部地震測站，收集大量的地動觀測資料，作為地震研究之重要數據來源。本研究採用這些地動紀錄，建立以台灣重大地震為主的地動數據庫。
目前世界上被最廣泛使用的地動數據庫是由太平洋地震科學研究中心（Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research center, PEER）所建立的，可藉由給定之反應譜（response spectrum）搜尋地動數據，而本研究所開發的地動數據庫，則能讓使用者依據累積絕對速度（CAV）進行搜尋。與最大地動加速度（PGA）及愛氏震度（Arias intensity, AI）相比，CAV是較新的地動強度量值，其計算包含完整記錄歷時的所有振幅，許多研究顯示，相較於不考慮地動持續時間的PGA，CAV更適合當作結構損壞的指標參數，此外還有變化版本CAVthreshold。本數據庫提供1327筆強地動數據，可依據感興趣的強度量值搜尋，作為後續研究之參考數據。
本研究提出八種強度量值之間的回歸關係，各強度量值基本呈現正相關性。再者，以CAV與CAVthreshold為主要參數，應用於2016年美濃地震與2018年花蓮地震之建物震損門檻值，及以ABAQUS數值模擬RC結構模型之六樓位移量。兩種結果皆顯示，CAV與CAVthreshold皆與建物損壞程度具有更好的相關性，而研究結果之CAV門檻值，可作為數據庫中地動的搜尋條件，用於未來研究之輸入數據。

The region around Taiwan is known for high seismicity, which has caused serious losses over the years, such as the 2016 southern Taiwan earthquake and 2018 Hualien earthquake. As a result, Central Weather Bureau (CWB) has set up more than 800 seismic stations scattering in Taiwan and obtained a number of original earthquake records. In this study, we used these records to establish a ground motion database.
The ground motion database developed by Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research center (PEER) is most commonly used nowadays, and the key input is a target response spectrum. Our ground motion database allows users to search for ground motions with a given cumulative absolute velocity (CAV). In contrast to peak ground acceleration (PGA) and Arias intensity (AI), CAV is a relatively new intensity measure, which is dependent on the whole duration of the ground motion. Recently, many studies have shown that CAV and the variants with acceleration threshold, CAVthreshold, are more indicative of structure damage than PGA. The database in this study provides 1327 strong ground motions, which can be adopted in the following research.
According to the ground motion data, the regressions between intensity measures reveal positive correlations. In addition, the database can be applied on structure damage thresholds of CAVs in the 2016 southern Taiwan earthquake and 2018 Hualien earthquake, and as input data in the model deformation simulation utilizing ABAQUS. Both results show that CAV and CAVthreshold have obvious correlations with structure damage. Furthermore, the CAV thresholds of results can be the searching values in the database, and the corresponding ground motion data are inputs of the numerical simulation or experiment.

[1] J. P. Wang and H. Taheri, “A seismic hazard analysis for the region of Tehran”, Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 121-127, May 2014.
[2] 鍾立來，臺大開放式課程：結構耐震設計導論。2020年5月28日，取自http://ocw.aca.ntu.edu.tw/ntu-ocw/ocw/cou/105S106。
[3] 內政部營建署，建築物耐震設計規範與解說，2011。
[4] Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake [Report NP-5930]. Palo Alto, California, 1988.
[5] J. W. Reed and R. P. Kasamara, “A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 123, pp. 387-396, 1990.
[6] Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Standardization of the cumulative absolute velocity [Report TR-100082-T2]. Palo Alto, California, 1991.
[7] 林宜嫻，「九二一集集大地震序列各地累積絕對速度值(CAV)之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國91年。
[8] J. P. Wang, Y. Xu, H. K. Chen and Y. M. Wu, “CAV site-effect assessment: A case study of Taipei Basin”, Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 108, pp. 142-149, 2018.
[9] L. Danciua and G.A. Tselentis, “Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97 No. 1B, pp. 162-183, 2007.
[10] K. W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, “A ground motion prediction equation for the horizontal component of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) based on the PEER-NGA strong motion database”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 26, pp. 635-650, 2010.
[11] 江沛恩，「台灣累積絕對速度(CAV)地震危害度分析」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國108年。
[12] Y. Xu, X. S. Tang, J. P. Wang and H. K. Chen, “Copula-based joint probability function for PGA and CAV: a case study from Taiwan”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 45, pp. 2123-2136, 2016.
[13] B. A. Bradley, “Empirical correlations between cumulative absolute velocity and amplitude-based ground motion intensity measures”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 37-54, February 2012.
[14] S. L. Kramer and R. A. Mitchell, “Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 413-438, May 2006.
[15] A. Arias, “A measure of earthquake intensity”, Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1970.
[16] 謝寶珊，「臺灣地區愛氏震度衰減式之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國97年。
[17] B. A. Bradley, “Correlation of Arias intensity with amplitude, duration and cumulative intensity measures”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 78, pp. 89-98, August 2015.
[18] 中央氣象局地震測報中心：強震資料下載。2019年6月4日，取自ftp://hoteq:eqhot@gdmsftp.cwb.gov.tw/
[19] Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Use of CAV in Determining Effects of Small Magnitude Earthquakes on Seismic Hazard Analyses [Report 1014099]. Palo Alto, California, June 2006.
[20] J. M. Liu, T. Wang, S. R. Wu and M. T. Gao, “New empirical relationship between Arias intensity and peak ground acceleration”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 106 No. 5, pp. 2168-2176, October 2016.
[21] 邱聰智，何郁姍，沈文成，盧奕羽，「0206花蓮地震震損建物資料分析與探討」，中華民國第14 屆結構工程及第4 屆地震工程研討會，24007號，2018年11月。
[22] D. M. Boore, J. Watson-Lamprey and N. Abrahamson, “Orientation-independent measures of ground motion”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 96, pp. 1502–1511, 2006.
[23] 邱群翔，「有限元素模型於希爾伯特-黃結構健康監測方法之應用-以不同阻尼為例」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國108年。
[24] 郭崇毓，「以振動台試驗探討加勁邊坡動態行為-基礎強度效應」，國立成功大學，碩士論文，民國108年。
[25] J. M. Liu, M. T. Gao, and J. J. Xie “Spatial Variability and Attenuation of Arias Intensity during the 1999 Chi-Chi Mw 7.6 Earthquake, Taiwan”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 105 No. 3, pp. 1768-1778, June 2015.