本研究旨在利用電腦與網路的特性，設計與建置一個網路化的寫作學習環境，此寫作環境包含了五個功能模組，分別是：寫作模組、評量模組、專家模組、工具模組、及系統管理模組。在寫作模組裡提供三項寫作主題，讓小學生能夠自由的在網路上進行寫作，在所設計的寫作主題裡進一步去培養個人的基本能力。
在所設計的評量模組裡還提供數種評量模式，其中所設計的專家評量，能夠給予小學生一些適當的評量及評語，可以讓小學生看了以後，用來作為下次寫作時參考的依據。另外評量模式還包括了同儕互評以及自評這兩部分，其中同儕互評的設計是透過觀摩別人的文章，然後針對所設計的評分項目，包括文章的修辭、組織結構及內容等給予評分以及一些意見。而自評的設計能夠讓他們給予自己文章的評量，進而學習檢視自己寫作文章時的優缺點。這兩種評量模式都是希望透過寫作過程理論(writing process model)裡所提到的「回顧」的寫作過程，讓小學生去回顧檢視文章裡的修辭、句子 及內容等，讓文章的品質提高。
在評量系統的實施結果裡發現，透過互評的機制，大部分的小學生確實能夠達到文章回顧的過程。而從專家評與互評的分數之間的統計來看，彼此之間並沒有顯著的差異，這顯示專家與小學生之間對文章有相同的看法，也表示本研究所提出的評分項目在專家與小學生之間看法一致。另外，自評的分數比起專家評與互評的分數來看則普遍的偏高，這與研究者預期的結果相符。

The purpose of this thesis is to design and develop a web-based writing environment. This environment includes five functional modules, those are writing module, assessment module, expert module, tools module and system management module. This writing environment provides three writing subjects for helping students writing on the internet. At the design of writing subject is to achieve the personal ability.
In this writing environment, several assessment are provided. The design of expert assessment gives some appropriate comments and grades for students. This will help them improve writing skills. Besides, the system provides peer assessment and self assessment. The design of peer assessment is to inspect from other students’ articles, and gives their assessment item grades and comments, this assessment item include article’s rhetoric, organization of structure and content, whereas the design of self assessment can give students chance to assess their articles for checking their strength and weaknesses on writing. In this two assessment modules, the purpose is to let the students reviewing rhetoric, sentence and content of their articles through the writing process of “reviewing”, them improve the quality of articles.
At the result of assessment module, through peer assessment most students can achieve an article reviewing process. It is no significant differences between expert assessment and peer assessment, it means that expert and students have the same views in articles. It also means that they have the same views in the design of assessment items. Besides, as predicted the grades of self assessment is higher then the grades of expert and peer assessment.

大學入學考試中心(86a)：指定科目考試規劃研究報告 (國文科) - 語文表達能力測驗研究 (一)，台北，大學入學考試中心。
大學入學考試中心(86b)：語文表達能力測驗研究 (二)，台北，大學入學考試中心。
王萬清(81)：寫作教學初學者之寫作教學內容知識結構及其改變歷程研究，國立台灣師範大學教育與輔導研究所博士論文。
林秋先(86)： 國小網路寫作教學之研究，國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
李煙長(89)：國小學童網路化寫作學習社群之建構與實施碩士論文。
柯華葳、尹玫君(79)：國民小學常用字及難度研究 低年級。台灣省國民學校教師研習會編印。
柯華葳、李換、李春芳(79)：國民小學常用字及難度研究 六年級。台灣省國民學校教師研習會編印。
陳英豪、吳裕益、王萬清(77)：兒童寫作能力測驗編製報告，台南師範學院初等教育系。
劉旨峰(91)： 網路同儕評量之研究.，國立交通大學資訊科學系博士論文。
張新仁(81)：不同寫作能力的國小學童之寫作過程研究，國科會專題計畫研究成果報告。
趙金婷(81)：國小學童寫作過程之研究，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡銘津(80)：寫作過程教學法對國小學童寫作成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
Almog, T., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1999)Teachers as peer learners: investigation in an advanced technological learning environment.
Bereiter, C. and Scadamalia, M.(1987)The psychology of written composition, NJ: Erlbaum.
Breese, C.(1996). Promise in Impermanence: Children Writing with Unlimited Access to Word Processors. Early Child Development and Care, 118, 67-91.
Cohen, M. and Riel, M.(1989)The effect of Distant Audiences on Students’ Writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2). 143-159.
Daiute, C. A.(1985). Issue in Using Computers to Socialize the Writing Process. ECT, 33(1), 41-50.
Falchikov, N.(1995) Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International., 32, 175-187.
Flower, L. and Hayes, J. (1981) A cognitive process of writing, College Composition and Communication, 32:365-387.
Freeman, M.(1995) Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 20, 289-300.
Grejda, G.(1992). The effect of word processing and revision patterns on the writing quality of six-grade students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50.
Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Bar-Natan, I. (2002)Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). Computer & Education, 39 (2002). 19-36.
Lam, F. S., & Pennington, M. C. (1995). The Computer vs. the Pen: A comparative study of word-processing in the Hong-Kong secondary classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(1),75-92.
Rada, R.(1998) Efficiency and effectiveness in computer-supported peer-peer learning. Computers and Education, 30, 3/4, 137-146.
S.S.J. Lin, E.Z.F. Liu & S.M. Yuan(2001)Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles.
Strachan, I.B. & Wilcox, S.(1996) Peer and self assessment of group work: Developing and effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microlimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education., 20, 3, 343-353