跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖元模
Yuan-Mo Liao
論文名稱: 使用者主導權的概念、成因及影響的實徵研究
指導教授: 何靖遠
Chuck Ho
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理學系
Department of Information Management
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 使用者專案主導權使用者參與資訊系統導入專案成功
外文關鍵詞: User participation, IS implementation, Project success, Project ownership
相關次數: 點閱:7下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 從資訊系統導入的學術和實務文獻均認為,專案中的高階主管、使用者、和資訊人員等是專案成功的利害關係人。從這些研究的氈遞中,研究的重點議題從使用者的參與,使用者的涉入、直線部門的領導、使用者與資訊人員的夥伴關係、到使用者負成敗責任的使用者主導權,使用者在專案中的角色愈來愈受到重視。在本研究中,我們是以心理上的使用者專案主導權為探討的重點。首先探討資訊系統導入專案中的使用者主導權概念的形成,進而探討使用者主導權的決定因子,及其對資訊系統導入專案成功的影響。
    我們徵詢國內企業曾參與資訊導入專案的關鍵使用者為對象,收集到127份有效問卷。經過文獻整理,以及信度和效度的檢驗,本研究中使用者專案主導權的概念,可以用使用者對資訊系統的瞭解和責任,以及在專案中主觀的影響和控制程度來衡量。研究發現使用者參與、使用者態度、使用者自我效能、資源限制等因素都會衝擊使用者主導權的程度;使用者?與資訊人員間的溝通品質雖不構成顯著的影響因子,卻與使用者主導權,均對資訊系統導入專案的成功有顯著的影響。


    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究問題與目的 3 第四節 研究流程 4 第五節 論文架構 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 資訊系統導入 7 第二節 使用者參與及涉入 9 第三節 資訊科技的接受與使用 13 第四節 使用者主導權 16 第五節 使用者滿意度 20 第六節 文獻總結 24 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 資訊系統導入專案的使用者主導權 25 第二節 研究模型及架構 28 第三節 研究變數及假說 30 第四節 研究變數的測量 39 第五節 問卷設計 43 第六節 資料收集 45 第四章 資料分析 46 第一節 樣本基本資料分析 46 第二節 構念測量模型的效度與信度分析 48 第三節 假說檢定 53 第四節 與先前研究之比較 57 第五節 其它的發現 60 第六節 資料分析結果總結 61 第五章 結論 63 第一節 研究結果 63 第二節 研究發現與討論 64 第三節 研究限制 65 第四節 建議與未來研究方向 66 參考文獻 68 附錄:研究問卷 73

    1.Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M., “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirial Research,” Psy. Bull (84:5), 1977, pp. 888-918.
    2.Avital, M. and Vandenbosch, B. “The Relationship between Psychological Ownership and IT-Driven Value,” International Conference on Information Systems, Proceedings of the Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems, 2000.
    3.Avital, M., and Vandenbosch, B.“Ownership Interaction: A key Ingredient of Information Technology Performance,” Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations (2), 2002 Winter.
    4.Bailey, J. E., and Pearson, S. W. “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science (29:5), 1983, pp. 530-545.
    5.Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Throught and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
    6.Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. “Rethinking the Concept of User involvement,” MIS Quarterly (13:1), 1989, pp. 53-63.
    7.Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. “Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude,” MIS Quarterly (18:1), 1994, pp. 59-82.
    8.Baronas, A.M. K., and Louis, M, R. “Restoring a Sense of Control During Implementation: How User Involvement Leads to System Acceptacne,” MIS Quarterly (12:1), 1988, pp. 111-124.
    9.Baroudi, J. J., and Orlikowski, W. J. “A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use,” Journal of Management Information Systems (4:4), 1988, pp. 44-59.
    10.Bartkus, B. R. “Employee Ownership as Catalyst of Organizational Change,” Journal of Organizational Change Management (10:4), 1997, pp. 331-349.
    11.Bassellier, G., and Benbasat, I. “Business Competence of Information Technology Professionals: Conceptual Development and Influence on IT-Business Partnerships,” MIS Quarterly (28:4), 2004, pp. 673-694.
    12.Boland, R. J., Jr. “The Process and Product of System Design,” Management Science (14:9), 1978, pp. 887-898.
    13.Cavaye, A. L.M. “User Participation in System Development Revisited,” Information and Management (28:5), 1995, pp. 311-323.
    14.Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., and Huff, S. “Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 145-158.
    15.Conrath, D. W., and Mignen, O. P. “What is Being Done to Measure User Satisfaction with EDP/MIS,” Information and Management (19:1), 1990, pp. 7-19.
    16.Coombs, C. R., Doherty, N.F., and Loan-Clarke, J. “The Importance of User Ownership and Positive User Attitudes in the Successful Adoption of Community Information Systems,” Journal of End User Computing (13:4), 2001, pp. 5-16.
    17.Daft, R., Lengel, R., and Trevino, L. “Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (11:3), 1987, pp. 355-366.
    18.DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E. R. “Information system Success: The quest for the dependent variable”, Information System Research (13:1), 1992, pp.60-95
    19.DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E. R. “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information system Success: A Ten-Year Update”, Journal of Management Information Syatem (19:4), 2003, pp.9-30
    20.Dhillon, G. “Dimensions of Power and IS Implementation,” Information and Management (41:5), 2004. pp. 635-644.
    21.Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T. S., Torkzadeh, and Xiz, W. “The Meaning and Measurement of User Satisfaction: A Multigroup Invariance Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument,” Journal of Management Information Systems (12:1), 2004, pp. 227-262.
    22.Doll, W. J., and Torkzadeh, G. “The Measurement of End-user Computing Satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly (12:2), 1988, pp. 259-274.
    23.Edstrom, A. “User Influence and the Success of MIS Projects: A Contingency Approach,” Human Relations (30:7), 1977, pp. 589-607.
    24.Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. “Organizational Context and the Success of Mangement Information Systems,” Management Science (24:10), 1978, pp. 1064-1077.
    25.Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., “Attitudes Toward Objects as Predictors of Single and Multiple Behavioral Criteria,” Psy. Rev. (81:1), 1974, pp.59-74.
    26.Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 1975.
    27.Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:3), 1981, pp. 39-50.
    28.Franz, C. R., and Robey, D. “ An Investigation of User-Led System Design: Rational and Political Perspectives,” Communications of the ACM (27:12), 1984, pp. 1202-1209.
    29.Ginzberg, M. J. “Early Diagosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions,” Management Science (27:4), 1981, pp. 459-478.
    30.Griffith, T. L., and Northcraft, G. B. “Cognitive Elements in the Implementation of New Technology: Can Less Information Provide More Benefits?,” MIS Quarterly (20:1), 1996, pp. 99-110.
    31.Gottschalk, P. “Implementation Predictors of Strategic Information Systems Plans,” Information and Management (36:2), 1999, pp. 77-91.
    32.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, 1998.
    33.Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science (40:4), 1994, pp. 440-465.
    34.Henderson, J. C. “Plugging into Strategic Partnerships: The Critical IS Connection,” Sloan Management Review (31:3), 1990, pp.7-18.
    35.Henry, J. W., and Stone, R. W. “Computer Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy: The Effects on the End-User’s Job Satisfaction,” ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel (16:4), 1995, pp. 15-34.
    36.Hirschheim, R. A. “User Experience with and Assessment of Participative Systems Design,” MIS Quarterly (9:4), 1985, pp. 295-303.
    37.Ho, C. Y. and Chang, C. S. “User Ownership: An Empirical Test in the Context of ERP Implementation,” The Second Workshop on Knowledge Economy and Electronic Commerce, Ping-Dong, Oct. 2-3, 2004.
    38.Hong K. K., and Kim, Y. G. “The Critical Success Factors for ERP Implementation: An Organizational Fit Perspective,” Information and Management (40:1), 2002, pp. 25-40.
    39.Hunton, J. E., and Beeler, J. D. “Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment,” MIS Quarterly (21:4), 1997, pp. 359-387.
    40.Hunton, J. E., and Price, K. H. “Effects of the User Participation Process and Task Meaningfulness on Key Information System Outcomes,” Management Science (4:6), 1997, pp. 797-812.
    41.Hwang, M. I., and Thorn, R. G. “The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings,” Information and Management (35:4), 1999, pp. 229-236.
    42.Ives, B., and Olson, M. H. “User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research,” Management Science (30:5), 1984, pp. 586-603.
    43.Ives, B., Olson, M. H., and Baroudi, J. J. “The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction,” Communications of the ACM (26:10), 1983, pp. 785-793.
    44.Joreskog, K. G., and Sobom, D., Liserel 7 User’s Reference Guide, Scientific, Chicago, IL, 1989.
    45.Joshi, K. “A Model of Users’ Perspective on Change: The Case of Information Systems Technology Implementation,” MIS Quarterly (15:2), 1991, pp. 229-242.
    46.Kaiser, H. F. “An Index of Factorial Simplicity,” Psychometrika (39), 1974, pp. 31-36.
    47.King, W. R. and Rodriguez, J. I. “Participative Design of Strategic Decision Support Systems: An Empirical Assessment,” Management Science (27:6), 1981, pp. 717-726.
    48.King, W. R., Grover, V., and Hufnagel, E. “Using Information and Information Technology for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Some Empirical Evidence,” Information and Management (17:2), 1989, pp. 87-93.
    49.Leana, C. R., Ahlbrandt, R. S., and Murrell, A. J. “The Effects of Employee Involvement Programs on Unionized Workers’ Attitudes, Perceptions, and Preferences in Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal (35:4), 1992, pp. 861-873.
    50.Lee, J. N., and Kim, Y. G. “Effect of Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation,” Journal of Management Information Systems (15:4), 1999, pp. 29-61.
    51.Leonard-Barton, D., and Deschamps, I. “Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technnology,” Management Science (34:10), 1988, pp. 1252-1265.
    52.Levine, H. G., and Rossmoore, D. “Politics and the Function of Power in a Case Study of IT Implementation,” Journal of Management Information Systems (11:3), 1994-95, pp. 115-133.
    53.Lia, V. S., and Mahapatra, R. K. “Exploring the Research in Information Technology Implementation,” Information and Management (32:4), 1997, pp. 187-201.
    54.Likert, R., The Human Organization: Its Management and Value, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
    55.Lin, W. T., and Shao, B. B.M “The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach,” Information and Management (37:6), 2000, pp. 283-295.
    56.Lu, H. P., and Wang, J. Y. “The Relationships between Management Styles, User Participation, and System Success over MIS Growth Stages,” Information and Management (32:4), 1997, pp. 203-213.
    57.Lucas, H. C. Jr. “Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation,” MIS Quarterly (2:2), 1978, pp. 27-42.
    58.Marble, R. P. “A System Implementation Study: Management Commitment to Project Management,” Information and Management (41:1), 2003, pp. 111-123.
    59.Markus, M. L. “Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation,” Communications of the ACM (26:6), 1983, pp. 430-444.
    60.McFarlan, F. W. “Portfolio Approach to Information Systems,” Journal of Systems Management, 1982, pp. 12-19.
    61.McKeen, J. D., and Guimaraes, T. “Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems (14:2), 1997, pp.133-150.
    62.McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T., and Wetherbe, J. C. “The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors,” MIS Quarterly (18:4), 1994, pp. 427-451.
    63.Melone, N. P. “A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research,” Management Science (36:1), 1990, pp. 76-91.
    64.Mohr, J., and Spekman, R. “Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques,” Strategic Management Journal (15:2), 1994, pp. 135-152.
    65.Myers, R. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications (2nd ed.), Boston: Duxbury Press.
    66.Nelson K. M., and Cooprider, J. G. “The Contribution of Shared Knowledge of IS Group Performance”, MIS Quarterly (20:4), 1996, pp.409-429.
    67.Nelson R. R. “Educational Needs as Perceived by IS and End-User Personnel: A Survey of Knowledge and Skill Requirements,” MIS Quarterly (15:4), 1991, pp.503-525.
    68.Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H., Applied Liner Statistical Model, 2d ed. Homewood, IL : Irwin, 1985.
    69.Nichols, M. L. “A Behavioral Analysis for Planning MIS Implementation,” MIS Quarterly (5:1), 1981, pp. 57-66.
    70.Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, K. T. “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organization,” Academy of Management Review (26:2), 2001, pp. 298-310.
    71.Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., and Morgan, S. “Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects,” Academy of Management Review (16:1), 1991, pp. 121-144.
    72.Reich, B. H., and Benbasat, I. “Factors that Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment between Business and Information Technology Objectives,” MIS Quarterly (24:1), 2000, pp. 81-113.
    73.Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., and Lirtzman, S. I. “Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organization,” Administrative Science Quarterly (15:2), 1970, pp. 150-163.
    74.Robey, D., and Farrow, D. “User Involvement in Information System Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical Test,” Management Science (28:1), 1982, pp. 73-85.
    75.Rockart, J. “The Line Takes Leadership—IS Management in a Wired Society,” Sloan Management Review (29:4), 1988, pp. 57-63.
    76.Rushinek, A., and Rushinek, S. F. “What Makes Users Happy?,” Communications of the ACM (29:7), 1986, pp. 594-598.
    77.Saleem, N. “An Empirical Test of the Contingency Approach to User Participation in Information Systems Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems (13:1), 1996, pp.145-166.
    78.Sarker, S., and Lee, A. S. “Using a Case Study to Test the Role of Three Key Social Enablers in ERP Implementation,” Information and Management (40:8), 2003, pp. 813-829.
    79.Segars, A. H. “Assessing the Unidimensionality of Measurement: A Paradigm and Illustration within the Context of Information Systems Research,” Omega (25:1), 1997, pp. 107-121.
    80.Sharma, R., and Yetton, P. “The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (27:4), 2003, pp. 533-555.
    81.Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., and Gur-arie, O. “Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:3), 1981, pp. 291-300.
    82.Shoval, P., and Giladi, R. “Determination of an Implementation Order for IS Projects,” Information and Management (31:2), 1996. pp. 67-74.
    83.Srinivasan, A., and Kaiser, K. M. “Relationships between Selected Organizational Factors and Systems Development,” Communications of the ACM (30:6), 1987, pp. 556-562.
    84.Swanson, E. B. “Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement,” Management Science (21:2), 1974, pp. 178-188.
    85.Tait, P., and Vessey, I. “The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach,” MIS Quarterly (12:1), 1988, pp. 91-108.
    86.Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., and Howell, J. M. “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization,” MIS Quarterly (15:1), 1991, pp. 124-143.
    87.Todd, P. A., McKeen, J. D., and Gallupe, R. B. “The Evolution of IS Skills: A Content Analysis of IS Job Advertisements from 1979 to 1990,” MIS Quarterly (19:1), 1995, pp. 1-27.
    88.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G.., Davis, G.. B., and Davis, F. D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), 2003, pp. 425-478.
    89.Verrijn-Stuart, A. A., and Anzenhofer, K. “Information Systems User-Designer Communication Problems,” Information and Management (14:3), 1988, pp. 133-142.
    90.Zierden, W. E. “Congruence in the Work Situation: Effects of Growth Needs, Management Style, and Job Structure on Job-Related Satisfactions,” Journal of Occupational Behaviour (1:4), 1980, pp. 297-310.
    91.Zmud, R. W., and Cox, J. F. “The Implementation Process: A Change Approach,” MIS Quarterly (3:2), 1979, pp. 35-43.

    QR CODE
    :::