具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐鋼構架耐震性能研究｜國立中央大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	曾偉展 Wei-Chan Tseng
論文名稱：	具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐鋼構架耐震性能研究
指導教授：	許協隆 Hsieh-Lung Hsu
口試委員:
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年：	2020
畢業學年度：	108
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	158
中文關鍵詞：	A型斜撐構架、束制S型消能器、耐震性能
外文關鍵詞：	A braced frame, S damper, Seismic design
相關次數：	點閱：14 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究針對新設計具束制之S型消能器進行探討，將其配置在A型斜撐中測試其性能且進行耐震評估，將S型消能器與前人設計之曲線消能器相做消能容量及強度分析比較，發現S型消能器在力量強度上相較曲線消能器可提升1.6倍，累計消能能提升至少2.5倍以上，其原因為將原本曲線消能器由單曲率改為雙曲率之S型消能器，因相同變位曲率增大的前提下，有效增加了消能容量，A型斜撐位移放大效果，能使S型消能器充分展現其良好的消能特性。
為驗證此設計之可行性，本研究首先針對不同尺寸之S型消能器進行
構件試驗，界定消能元件之遲滯行為，後經由適當配置之不同尺度S型消能器應用於構架中進行一系列載重試驗，研究結果顯示，配置束制S型消能器之A型斜撐構架能有效維持梁柱構件等主結構之完整性且提升勁度，斜撐構架強度可提升抗彎構架之1.6至2.1倍，整體構架總能量消散方面相較於未裝設束制S型消能器之構架亦提升為3倍以上，由上述之研究結果可知，此設計可有效提升結構之承載性能，對於耐震效能提升設計，具有相當之可行性。

This study focused on the performance evaluation of A braced frame with S damper. The purpose of this study is to improve the curve damper have better strength and energy dissipation capacity, so S damper was designed. In order to validate the effectiveness of the proposed A braced frame with S damper, a series of cyclic loading tests with various damper dimensions were conducted.
According to the experimental results, this design could maintain the main
structures in elastic stage. S damper started to dissipate energy in early deformation stage and had exhibited ductility to 10% deformation ratio without crack. Experimental results of A braced tests show that deformation ratio of S damper could be amplified in the proposed A brace design. To be more specific, the brace strength and stiffness of the proposed design were effectively enhanced. Therefore, the applicability of this design was verified through experimental and numerical studies of the test frames.

摘要    I
ABSTRACT    II
目錄    III
表目錄    VII
圖目錄    IX
照片目錄    XIV
第一章    緒論    1
1-1前言    1
1-2研究動機與目的    1
1-3研究內容與方法    3
1-4論文架構    3
第二章 文獻回顧    5
2-1抗彎構架相關研究    5
2-2同心斜撐相關研究    6
2-3梁柱接頭相關研究    6
2-4挫屈束制斜撐構架相關研究    9
2-5曲線消能器相關研究    9
2-6 A型斜撐相關研究    10
2-7材料試驗相關研究    10
2-8鋼結構設計相關規定    10
2-8-1強柱弱梁設計    11
2-8-2梁斷面要求    12
2-8-3柱強度要求    12
2-8-4梁柱腹板交會區設計    12
2-8-5含被動消能系統建築物之設計    14
第三章 理論分析    15
3-1前言    15
3-2具束制S型消能器    15
3-2-1 S型消能器內力分析    19
3-2-2 S型消能器應變能分析    20
3-3A型斜撐強度分析    20
3-3-1 A型斜撐內力分析    20
3-3-2A型斜撐應變能    21
3-3-3 A型斜撐與S型消能器關係推導    21
3-4 A型斜撐構架勁度分析    24
3-5 ANSYS有限元素模型建立    26
第四章 實驗規劃與流程    31
4-1前言    31
4-2實驗規劃與研究參數    31
4-3試體標號    32
4-3-1 S型消能器之A型斜撐構件試驗    32
4-3-2A型斜撐構架試驗    32
4-4試體製作    32
4-5試驗設備    33
4-6試驗方法    34
4-6-1具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐試驗方法    34
4-6-2抗彎構架試驗方法    35
4-7加載歷時    36
第五章 實驗結果觀察    38
5-1前言    38
5-2 具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐承載行為    39
5-2-1 S-70-90-30    39
5-2-2 S-70-80-30    39
5-2-3 S-70-100-20    40
5-2-4 S-70-100-20 NR    41
5-2-5 S-90-100-30    42
5-2-6具束制S型消能器性能比較    43
5-3具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐構架承載行為    44
5-3-1 AF-70-90-30    44
5-3-2 AF-70-80-30    45
5-3-3 構架試驗性能比較    46
第六章 結果分析與比較    47
6-1前言    47
6-2具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐試驗結果比較    47
6-2-1不同深度之具束制S型消能器強度比較    47
6-2-2有無束制之具S型消能器強度比較    48
6-2-3 具束制S型消能器之斜撐承載性能比較    48
6-2-4具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐&構架等效阻尼比    49
6-3具束制S型消能器與曲線消能器實驗承載性能比較    50
6-3-1具束制S型消能器與曲線消能器力量強度實驗比較    50
6-3-2具束制S型消能器與曲線消能器累計消能實驗比較    50
6-3-3具束制S型消能器與曲線消能器勁度實驗比較    51
6-3-4具束制S型消能器與曲線消能器實驗承載性能比較    51
6-4具束制S型消能器與相同降伏強度曲線消能器承載性能比較    51
6-4-1曲線消能器模擬分析    52
6-4-2相同材料強度之S型消能器與曲線消能器承載性能比較    52
6-4-3曲線消能器之A型斜撐構架模擬分析    53
6-4-4相同材料強度之S型消能器與曲線消能器構架承載性能比較    54
6-5具束制S型消能器之A型斜撐構架與抗灣架承載行為比較    54
6-5-1 FS-70-90-30與MF承載性能比較    54
6-5-2 FS-70-80-30與MF承載性能比較    55
6-6配置具束制S型消能器及曲線消能器之A型斜撐構架比較    55
6-7有限元素分析軟體與試驗數據比較    56
第七章 結論與建議    58
7-1結論    58
7-2建議    59
參考文獻    60

                                

1. Krawinkler, H. (1978), “Shear in Beam-Column Joint in Seismic Design of
Steel Frames”, Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol.15, pp.82-91.
2. Tsai, K.C. and Popov, E.P. (1990), “Seismic Panel Zone on Elastic Story Driftin Steel Moment Resistance Frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, Vol.116, No.12, pp. 3285-3301.
3. Taranath, B.S. (1988), Structural analysis and design of tall buildings, McGraw-Hill Company, New York.
4. Youssef, N.F.G., Bonowitz, D., and Gross, J.L. (1995), “A survey of steel
moment-resisting frame buildings affected by the 1994 Northridge Earthquake,” Report No. NISTIR 5625, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
5. Tremblay, R., Timler, P., Bruneau, M. and Filiatrault, A. (1995), “Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), pp. 338-360.
6. Krawinkler, H. (1996), “Earthquake design and performance of steel structures,” Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 29(4), pp. 229-241.
7. Tremblay, R. (2001), “Seismic behavior and design of concentrally braced steel frames”, Engneering Journal, Vol.38, No.3, pp.148-160.
8. Aziznamini, A., and Radziminiski, J.B. (1989), “Static and cyclic performance of semi-rigid steel beam-to-column connections”, Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.115, No.12, pp.2979-2999
9. Shi G,Wang M, Wang YQ, Wang F.(2013) Numerical study on seismic behaviors of steel frame end-plate connections.
10. 內政部營建署(2006)，鋼構造建築物鋼結構設計技術規範。
11. 陳純森（2012 年3 月），「高層建築使用實例」，鋼結構工程實務（第四版），科技圖書股份有限公司，pp.1-8 ~ 1-13。
12. Wakabayashi M, Nakamura T, Kashibara A, Morizono T, Yokoyama H, 1973,Experimental study of elasto-plastic properties of precast concrete wall panels with built-in insulating braces, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, 1041-1044 (in Japanese).
13. Halim, H. (2015), Performance Improvement of Semi-rigid Moment Frame with Curved Dampers,國立中央大學土木工程學系，碩士論文。
14. Halim, H. (2019), Seismic Performance of A-Braced Frames with Amplified
Deformation Steel Curved Dampers, 國立中央大學土木工程學系，博士論
文。
15. ASTM, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.
16. AISC, Manual of Steel Construction Allowable Stress Design, 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago III.2020.
17. 內政部營建署(2011)，建築物耐震設計規範及解說，台北。
18. ANSYS. Workbench user’s guide ANSYS Inc.;2016
19. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components. Report No. FEMA461, Washington, DC, USA;2007.
20. Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: prentice Hall; 2001.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文