視覺化創意發想互動式平台之研究幫助生意人在資源有限的情況下建立與其他生意人交流之共同語言，並提供視覺化解決方案幫助生意人在商場上成功獲利。該視覺化解決方案為因果脈絡圖的沙盤推演。
在此平台上使用者可以運用可操作性經營元件資料庫自行操縱因果脈絡圖元件關連：釐清各種經營要素間背後的驅動關係，結合自身經驗從中尋找合適的經營模式發展方向。該平台還整合了過去平台使用者的創業經驗使創新者或創業者們能更輕易地自行發想並建構經營模式之因果脈絡圖，也能進行線上的腦力激盪，利用此平台蒐集的群眾智慧所創造出的經營元件要素建立共同語言供各領域的創新者或創業者們進行視覺化交流，與平台其他用戶討論出最適當的經營模式活動連結。
本研究也利用了紮根理論質性資料分析方法來補足十大經營元件中科技元件之認知，讓創新者或創業們在規劃因果脈絡圖時能提供後續更多科技元件使用上的思維。
如果生意人有效利用此平台之可操作性的經營模式元件資料庫進行創新或設計經營模式，就能透過視覺化的解決方案幫助生意人思考下一步該如何前進才能使自身經營模式邁向成功。

The study on the interactive idea generation platform with Visualization can help business people to establish a common language to communicate with other business people with limited resources. This platform also provides visualization solutions to help business people succeed in the market and profit. The visualization solution is a scenario planning of the cause and effect diagrams.
This study's platform allows users to manipulate the components using a database of the Operable Business model component. It clarifies the driving relationship between the various operating factors and combines our experience to find the appropriate business model development direction. The platform also integrates the entrepreneurial expertise of past platform users to make it easier for innovators or entrepreneurs to develop and construct their cause and effect diagrams of business models. They can also do online brainstorming by using the experience of the public to collect data from the past, and a common language creates visual communication among innovators or entrepreneurs in various fields. They communicate with other users to find the most appropriate business model activity link.
This study also uses the qualitative data analysis method of grounded theory to complement the knowledge of technological components in the top ten business model components. It provides further ideas on the use of technology components when planning their cause and effect diagrams.
Business people use the platform's operable business model components database to innovate or design business models. In that case, the visual solutions will help them think about the next step forward to make their business models successful.

中文文獻
[1] 林裕得 (2008)。雙基因平衡企業系統：Google演進中經營模式結構之探索性研究 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
[2] 張雅晴 (2020)。經營模式認知圖像化平台之試作及前導研究 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
[3] 張博閔 (2008)。演進中經營模式結構之紮根研究：後深次微米時代TSMC與UMC之比較分析 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
[4] 陳銑鈞 (2006)。經營模式元件及其間關係之紮根研究 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[5] 蔡明宏、林裕得、蘇雅惠、連文雄 (出版中，2022)。活動互賴觀點之經營模式創新歷程的札根研究－以 Google 1996–2008 為展示實例。管理評論。
[6] Anselam Strausss & Juliet Corbin (2001)。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法 (吳芝儀、廖梅花譯)。濤石。(原著出版年：1997)
[7] Kevin Kelly (2016)。必然 (嚴麗娟譯)。貓頭鷹。(原著出版年：2016)
[8] Walter Isaacson (2015)。創新者們 (齊若蘭、陳以禮譯)。遠見天下。(原著出版年：2014)

外文文獻
[1] Afuah, A. (2004). Does a focal firm's technology entry timing depend on the impact of the technology on co-opetitors? Research Policy, 33(8), 1231-1246.
[2] Alsswey, A. and H. Al-Samarraie (2020). Elderly users’ acceptance of mHealth user interface (UI) design-based culture: the moderator role of age. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 14(1), 49-59.
[3] Ansari, F., et al. (2018). Rethinking human-machine learning in industry 4.0: how does the paradigm shift treat the role of human learning?. Procedia manufacturing, 23, 117-122.
[4] Bellman, R., et al. (1957). On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game. Operations Research, 5(4), 469-503.
[5] Berger, P. L. and H. Kellner (1981). Sociology reinterpreted: An essay on method and vocation. Anchor Books.
[6] Birkinshaw, J., & Goddard, J. (2009). What is your management model?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 81-90.
[7] Bocken, N., et al. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67-81.
[8] Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
[9] Carlo, J. L., et al. (2011). Internet computing as a disruptive information technology innovation: the role of strong order effects 1. Information systems journal, 21(1), 91-122.
[10] Casadesus-Masanell, R. and J. E. Ricart (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195-215.
[11] Cong, W. (2014). USABILITY EVALUATION OF PUBLIC WEB MAPPING SITES. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 2(4), 285-289.
[12] Cossette, P. 2002. Analysing the thinking of FW Taylor using cognitive mapping. Management Decision, 40(2): 168-182.
[13] Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of advanced nursing, 31(6), 1476-1484.
[14] Cybulski, P. and T. Horbiński (2020). User experience in using graphical user interfaces of web maps. Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 412.
[15] DaSilva, C. M. and P. Trkman (2014). Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, 47(6), 379-389.
[16] Ford, D., et al. (2003). Managing Business Relationships. Chichester. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/947226.947237
[17] Ford, D. and S. Mouzas (2010). Networking under uncertainty: Concepts and research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(6), 956-962.
[18] Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239.
[19] George, G. and A. J. Bock (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(1), 83-111.
[20] Ghaziani, A. and M. J. Ventresca (2005). Keywords and cultural change: Frame analysis of business model public talk, 1975–2000. Sociological Forum, 20, 523- 559.
[21] Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
[22] Hamel, G. (2002). Leading the Revolution: How to Thrive in Turbulent Times by Making Innovation a Way of Life. Plume.
[23] Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harper.
[24] Jacelon, C. S. and K. K. O’Dell (2005). Case and grounded theory as qualitative research methods. Urologic nursing, 25(1), 49-52.
[25] Kelly, K. (1992). Out Of Control: The New Biology Of Machines, Social Systems, And The Economic World. Basic Books.
[26] Kelly, K. (2010). What Technology Wants. Viking.
[27] Li, G. P., et al. (2017). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Technological Drivers, Impacts and Coping Methods. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4), 626-637.
[28] Lund, M. and C. Nielsen (2014). The evolution of network-based business models illustrated through the case study of an entrepreneurship project. Journal of Business Models, 2(1), 105-121.
[29] Martins, L. L., et al. (2015). Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 99-117.
[30] Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.
[31] Nuvolari, A. (2019). Understanding successive industrial revolutions: A development block approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 32, 33-44.
[32] Osterwalder, A., et al. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.
[33] Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
[34] Roome, N. and C. Louche (2016). Journeying toward business models for sustainability: A conceptual model found inside the black box of organisational transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 11-35.
[35] Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward fit. Administrative science quarterly, 47(1), 125-159.
[36] Sinfield, J. V., et al. (2012). How to identify new business models. MIT Sloan management review, 53(2), 85-90.
[37] Stern, P. N., et al. (1982). The nurse as grounded theorist: History, process, and uses. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7(142), 200-215.
[38] Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. APA PsycInfo.
[39] Tikkanen, H., et al. (2005). Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management decision, 43(6), 789-809.
[40] Turner, B. A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: one way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and quantity, 15(3), 225-247.
[41] Wirtz, B. W., et al. (2016). Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 36-54.
[42] Zott, C., et al. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management, 37(4), 1019-1042.  

網路資源
[1] 莊清瑋 (2021，4月21日)。第四次工業革命正在發生5G和AIoT扮關鍵要角。https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&id=607628
[2] They Make Design (2019, Feb 25). What is UI design? What is UX design? UI vs UX: What’s the difference. https://uxplanet.org/what-is-ui-vs-ux-design-and-the-difference-d9113f6612de
[3] Philip Roberts (2014, Oct 9). What the heck is the event loop anyway?. https://2014.jsconf.eu/speakers/philip-roberts-what-the-heck-is-the-event-loop-anyway.html
[4] Tom Friedman (2017, Aug 1). Closing Lunch: In Conversation with Tom Friedman. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmMPpq9PwGg
[5] Sivaramakirshnan Somasegar and Daniel Li (2016, Nov 29). Every company is a technology company, but most don’t behave like one. https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/29/every-company-is-a-technology-company-but-most-dont-behave-like-one/
[6] shin ken (2021, Jan 9). My Event Loop Note. https://metal852794613.medium.com/%E6%88%91%E7%9A%84event-loop%E7%AD%86%E8%A8%98-bf096050b976