| 研究生: |
陳昱瑛 Yu-Ying Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
中國股權分置改革對審計公費之影響 The Influence of Chinese Split-share Structure Reform on Audit Fees |
| 指導教授: |
王曉雯
Hsiao-Wen Wang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計研究所 Graduate Institute of Accounting |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 57 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 國際財務報告準則 、會計師事務所品牌聲譽 、審計公費 、股權分置改革 、會計師事務所規模 、企業會計準則 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Auditor Size, Audit Fee, Brand Name Reputation, Split-share Structure Reform, China Accounting Standards, International Financial Reporting Standards |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:13 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
股權分置改革是近年來中國邁向資本主義市場重要的里程碑,由計劃經濟體制逐漸轉向自由經濟體制。隨著證券市場邁入資本主義潮流,中國審計市場未來會如何發展,本研究以審計公費因素來探討之。主要研究目的為:股權分置改革與企業會計準則的適用,是否會使公司對審計品質的需求提升,而願意支付較高的審計公費;提供較高審計品質服務之會計師事務所,是否能收取較高的審計公費。
實證結果顯示:第一、股權分置改革後,審計公費較改革前增加。原先的非流通股份股轉換為流通股股份,其股份價值改為證券市場之交易價格,導致公司有誘因支付較高的審計公費以取得品質較佳之財務報表。另外,過去財務報表品質較差,導致現在會計師事務所需花費更多時間與資源查核,同時亦承擔較高的訴訟風險,故會收取較高的審計公費。第二、採用企業會計準則後,審計公費較採用前增加。由於企業會計準則為原則性基礎,會計師事務所因而需要花費更多時間與資源查核,同時專業判斷亦受到挑戰面臨較高的審計風險,故採用企業會計準則後會收取較高的審計公費。第三、股權分置改革後,且採用企業會計準則,審計公費增加。第四、股權分置改革後,相較於提供較低審計品質之會計師事務所,提供較高審計品質之會計師事務所可以取得較高的審計公費。大規模會計師事務所,會提供較佳品質之審計服務,而股權分置改革後,重視審計品質的公司會傾向選擇由大規模會計師事務所查核,並願意支付較高的審計公費。
本研究指出面臨中國證券市場逐步的開放,公司對審計品質的需求日漸提升,其審計市場也朝著西方審計市場模式發展。本研究可做為新興市場及特殊資本市場之代表,同時亦警惕中國本土會計師事務所唯有提升審計品質,才能持續保有競爭力。
Split-share structure reform is a significant policy of China. It makes security market transform planned economic system into free economic system. However, how does it affect audit market in China? In this study, we research the relationship between split-share structure reform and audit fees.
First of all, the results suggest that audit fees increase after adopting of split-share structure reform. And then, we also find Big4 can charge higher audit fees than other accounting firms after adopting of split-share structure reform. Finally, we further document that audit fees increase after adopting of split-share structure reform and China accounting standards.
Our findings suggest that because of the open Chinese security market, companies need better audit quality. Therefore, Chinese audit market develop as western’s gradually. My study may be a considerable extension reference of emerging markets and other special capital markets. Also domestic accounting firms can keep survival and competitive only if they increase their audit quality accordingly.
王善平與李斌,2004,「我國上市公司審計收費影響因素的實證分析」,財經理論與實踐,第2期:68-71。
林嬋娟與林孝倫,2009,「會計師事務所規模、品牌與競爭程度對審計公費之影響:中國之實證」,會計評論,第49期:35-72。
李明輝,2006,「詴論會計師的刑事責任-兼談我國相關法律之修訂與完善」,審計研究,第6期:58-66。
吳溪,2007,「審計失敗中的審計責任認定與監管傾向:經驗分析」,會計研究,6月號:53-61。
奉立城與許偉河,2006,「股權分置改革詴點上市公司的超常收益實證研究」,當代財經,第2期:38-43。
胡寧與廖琪,2007,「我國上市公司股權分置改革效應研究」,當代財經,第8期:74-78。
張奇峰、張鳴與戴佳君,2006,「中國審計訂價實證研究述評」,會計研究,第6期:87-93。
章國榮、李葉喬與章秀芝,2009,「新企業會計準則與資本市場的規範和發展」,財務管理,第12期:47-49。
漆江娜、陳慧霖與張陽,2004,「事務所規模、品牌、價格與審計質量」,審計研究,第3期:59-65。
劉斌、葉建中與廖瑩毅,2003,「我國上市公司審計收費影響因素的實證研究」,審計研究,第1期:44-47。
Becher, C., and M. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (Spring): 1-24.
Chan, K. H., K. Lin, and P. L. L. Mo, 2006. A political-economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11 (March): 21-48.
Chen, J. P., X. Su, and X. Wu, 2007. Market competitiveness and Big 5 pricing: Evidence from China’s binary market. The International Journal of Accounting, 42: 1-24.
Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor, 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20 (December): 297-322.
Daske, H., L. Hail, C. Leuz, and R. Verdi, 2008. Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46 (December): 1085-1142.
DeAngelo, L. E., 1981. Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 3 (December): 183-199.
DeFong M., and J.Jiambalvo., 1993. Factors related to auditor – client disagreements over income – Increasing accounting methods. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9 (Spring): 415-431.
DeFond, M. L., T. J. Wong, and S. Li, 2000. The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28 (December): 269-305.
Francis, J. R., 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices-A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6 (August): 133-151.
Francis, J. R., and E. Wilson, 1988. Auditor change: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. The Accounting Review, 63 (October): 663-682.
Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong, 2006. Audit fee: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23 (Spring): 141-91.
Lin, Z. J., 2004. Auditor’s responsibility and independence: Evidence from China. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17: 167-190.
Lin, H. L., and A. R. Yen, 2010. The Effects of IFRS Adoption on Audit Fees for Listed Companies in China. Illinois International Accounting Symposium. Taipei, June 21-23.
Love, V. J., and J. H. Eickemeyer, 2009. IFRS and accountants’ liability. The CPA Journal, 79 (April): 54-56.
Marden, R. E., and K. S. ,Brackney, 2009. Audit risk and IFRS. The CPA Journal, 79 (June): 32-36.
Palmrose, Z. V., 1986. Audit fee and audit size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24 (Spring): 97-110.
Simunic, D. A., 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (Spring): 161-190.
Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong, 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68 (April): 346-366.