| 研究生: |
翁逸偉 Yi-Wei Weng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
鋼床鈑鋪面破壞分析及較適鋪面材料之探討 Distress Analysis and Suitable Paving Materials for Pavements on Steel Deck |
| 指導教授: |
林志棟
Jyh-Dong Lin 黃偉慶 Wei-Hsing Huang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 124 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 疲勞破壞 、GUSS瀝青混凝土 、鋼床鈑 、車轍破壞 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Steel Deck, GUSS asphalt concrete, rutting damage, fatigue damage |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:9 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
鋼橋位於交通要道上,常受交通之衝擊,故橋面上鋼床鈑之鋪面必須相應地提供優良的效能,以延長鋪面之使用年限。鋼床鈑鋪面材料之選擇,雖有多種材料選擇及組合方式,惟仍缺最重要的力學分析比較,以找出較適鋪面材料及其組合。本研究由力學計算方法出發,利用有限元素法ABAQUS軟體,在考慮高軸重高胎壓之重車載重下,進行鋼床鈑不同柔性鋪面材料組合之力學反應分析,以瞭解鋼床鈑鋪面破壞之原因,並藉此找出鋼床鈑鋪面配置原則及較適柔性鋪面之材料組合。
結果顯示,鋼床鈑鋪面之疲勞裂縫破壞,最快為載重下方面層底部由下往上之開裂,其次為沿肋梁上方面層表面之縱向開裂;本研究疲勞破壞判斷準則,找出面層內最大張應變,為面層底部之最大主張應變,與傳統疲勞理論相符。車轍破壞以鋼床鈑頂部最大壓應變為判斷準則,車輪載重處之面層受壓應變才是車轍主因。鋼床鈑單層鋪面應以回彈模數大者為優先考量;雙層鋪面以回彈模數大者置於底層,次大者置於面層為較適組合。鋼床鈑單層鋪面較適材料為全斷面GUSS瀝青混凝土;鋼床鈑雙層鋪面較適組合為上層改質瀝青混凝土,下層為GUSS瀝青混凝土。
The steel bridges are located on traffic artery, it is usually affected by traffic impact; hence, the pavement of the steel deck on the bridge must provide excellent efficiency to prolong the service life of pavement. This study utilized mechanical calculation method and finite element method ABAQUS software to analyze the mechanical response of different flexible pavement material combinations on steel deck. Heavy vehicle load with high axle load and high tire pressure were considered, so as to know the reasons for steel deck pavement distress, and to define the arrangement principle for steel deck pavement and the combination of materials suitable for flexible pavement.
The results show that the fatigue damage of steel deck pavement coincides with traditional theory, the maximum principal tensile strain at the bottom of surface course is still the determination criterion, As for the priority of two fatigue damage modes of steel deck pavement, the first one was the crack from the bottom up at the bottom of surface course, secondly the longitudinal crack near the top (or including bottom) of surface course on ribs. The maximum compressive strain on the top of steel plate is the determination criterion of rutting damage, the major cause for rut is the surface course under compressive strain in the wheel load position. The suitable material for steel deck one-course pavement is full depth GUSS asphalt concrete; the suitable combination for steel deck two-course pavement is modified asphalt concrete on top and GUSS asphalt concrete at bottom.
1.交通部國道新建工程局網站:http://www.taneeb.gov.tw。
2.Huang,Y.H.,”Pavement Analysis And Design”,second edition,Prentice Hall,Inc.,Upper Saddle River,New Jersey ,2004.
3.多田宏行編著,"鋼床鈑鋪裝的設計與施工",鹿島出版會,第95~97,134~139 頁,平成2 年。
4.楊金澤,「鋼床鈑鋪面材料特性研究」,碩士論文,中華大學土木工程學研究所,新竹,2000。
5.國立中央大學橋梁網站,http://www.cv.ncu.tw/civil/cber。
6.鄭芝貴,「鋼床鈑鋪設改值瀝青工法成效之評估」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2001。
7.道路橋示方書,同解說(I.共通篇;II.鋼橋篇),(社)日本道路協會,平成8年12月。
8.本州四國連絡橋之橋面舖裝相關資料調查研究報告書,(財)海洋架橋調查會。
9.Phillips, B. L.,Surfacing of Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridges, Country Roads Board of Victoria, Australia,1973.
10.交通部「公路橋梁設計規範」9.2.12之「鋼橋面鈑之上部結構」,第270~273頁,民國九十八年12月。
11.Design Manual for Orthotropic Steel Plate Deck Bridges, American Institute of Steel Construction, 1963.
12.AASHTO ,Standard Specifications for Highway Bridge,17th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C., 2002.
13.AASHTO ,LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. First Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1994.
14.Hudson, S. W., and Seeds, S.B., “Evaluation of increased pavementloading and tire pressures ”, Transportation Research Record 1207,pp. 197-206 , 1988.
15.Sebaaly, P. E., and Tabatabaee, N., “Effect of tire parameters on pavement
damage and load-equivalency factors ,” Journal of Transportation
Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 6, pp. 805-819 ,1993.
16.林宗賢,「重車與環境因素對柔性鋪面的影響」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2003。
17.Kim, O. K., Bell, C. A., and Wilson, J. E., “Effect of increased truck tire pressure on asphalt concrete pavement,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 329-350 ,1989.
18.廖溪坤,「材料對石膠泥瀝青混凝土成效特性影響之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,1999。
19.吳俊杰,「礦物添加物對石膠泥瀝青混凝土疲勞行為之影響」,碩士論文,國立中興大學土木工程研究所,臺中,1999。
20.Asphalt Institute, Thickness Design - Asphalt Pavement for Highways and Streets, Ninth, Manual Series No.1 (MS-1), The Asphalt Institute ,1981.
21.AASHTO , Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.,2008.
22.Shell, Shell Pavement Design Manual- Asphalt pavements and Overlays for Road Traffic, Shell International Petroleum, London ,1978.
23.Barker, W.R. and Brabston W.N., Development of a Structural Design Procedure for Flexible Airport Pavement, FAA Report No. FAA-RD-74-199,U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Federal Aviation Administration ,1974.
24.Harichandran, R.S., Buch, N. and Baladi, G. T. , “Flexible Pavement design in Michigan - Transition from Empirical to Mechanistic Methods ”, Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1778, pp.100-106,2001.
25.楊樹榮,「路基土壤之不飽和吸力特性及反覆載重下之力學行為」,博士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2005。
26.http://www.trb.org/mepdg,Transportation Research Board ,2002.
27.蘇育民,「瀝青膠漿性質對於排水性瀝青混凝土成效之影響」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2002。
28.張廖年禧,「國道高速公路鋪設石膠泥及排水性瀝青混凝土成效之研究」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2004。
29.潘承緯,「GUSS瀝青混凝土成效特性之研究」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2002。
30.Zaghloul S. and T.White, Use of Three-Dimensional, Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement, TRR1388,Transportation Research Record, pp.60-69,1992.
31.廖啟州,「高速公路柔性鋪面溫度分佈對鋪面破壞與服務年限之影響」,博士論文,中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2009。
32.廖小媛,「以力學-經驗準則探討溫度與重車載重對高速公路柔性鋪面之影響」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2009。
33.PCA,Thickness Design For Concrete Highway and Street Pavements,Portland Cement Association,1984.
34.Gerritsen,A.H.,van Gurp, C.A.P.M.,van der Heide, J.P.J., Molenaar,A.A.A., and Pronk,A.C.,”Prediction and Prevention of Surface Cracking in Asphaltic Pavements,”Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements,The University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, Michigan,pp.378-391,1987.
35.Dauzats,M.and Rampal,A.,”Mechanism of Surface Cracking in Wearing Courses”,Proceedings,6th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, The University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,Michigan,pp.232-247 ,1987.
36.Nunn,M.,”Design of Long-Life Roads for Heavy Traffic,” Proceedings, Industry Conference,Australian Asphalt Pavement Association,Surfers Paradise, Queensland,Australia,1998.
37.Myers,L.A.,Roque,R.,and Ruth,B.E.,”Mechanisms of Surface-Initiated Longitudinal Wheel Path Cracks in High-Type Bituminous Pavements,” Proceedings,Volume 67,Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists,1998.
38.Uhlmeyer,J.S.,Willoughby,K.,Pierce,L.M.and Mahoney,J.P.,”Top-down Cracking in Washington State Asphalt Concrete Wearing Courses,”Transportation Reserch Record No.1730,pp.110-116,2000.
39.ASTM D6433-99, “Standard Practice of Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys”, 1999.
40.ABAQUS,Finite Element Computer Program,Version 6.1-1,Hibbitt,Karlsson and Sorensen,Inc.,2000.
41.「瀝青混凝土鋪裝要綱」,日本道路協會,pp47-51,平成八年十月。
42.林志憲,「應用解析方法評估瀝青混凝土之力學機制」,博士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,台南,2003。
43.蔡長展,「瀝青流變行為對鋪面車轍變形之影響」,博士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,台南,2002。
44.夏明勝,「分析瀝青混凝土之材料及疲勞特性」,博士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,台南,2005。
45.黃隆昇,「瀝青混凝土巨觀車轍及微觀軌跡之行為機制分析」,博士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,台南, 2003。
46.American Association of state Highway and Transportation Office (AASHTO) ,AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures , Washington,D.C.,1993 .
47.Asphalt Institute(AI),Thickness Design-Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets,MS-1,10th edition,Kentucky,1991.
48.李旻霖,「柔性鋪面承載之非線性分析」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2003。
49.廖婉諭,「瀝青混凝土疲勞破壞與癒合之探討」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,台南,2004。
50.馮天正,「三維有限元素應用於柔性鋪面之非線性分析」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2000。
51.張永生,「柔性鋪面之績效評估與非均布荷重效應」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2002。
52.李旻霖,「柔性鋪面承載之非線性分析」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2003。
53.李勝雄,「鋪面材料回彈行為於車轍與疲勞破壞之影響評估」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2004。
54.李奇瑋,「反覆載重下鋪面之車轍損傷評估」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2007 。
55.呂雨蓉,「力學觀點探討不同柔性鋪面成效分析之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢,2004。
56.交通部國道高速公路公路局,"材料試驗手冊"瀝青篇,民國八十六年。
57.Croney, D. and Croney, P. ,The Design and Performance of Road Pavements, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill International Series in Civil Engineering, Chapter 25.
58.瀝青鋪裝要綱,(社)日本道路協會,昭和63年11月。
59.Kaiming Xia , ” A Finite Element Model for Tire/Pavement Interaction: Application to Predicting Pavement Damage”,International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology , pp.135-141,Vol.3.No.3 May 2010.
60.Haleh Azari,Alaeddin Mohseni,and Nelson Gibson, ”Verification of Rutting Predictions from Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide by Use of Accelerated Loading Facility Data”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2057, pp.157-167,2008.
61.Veronica T.F.Castelo Branco,Eyad Masad,Amit Bhasin ,and Dallas N. Little, ”Fatigue Analysis of Asphalt Mixtures Independent of Mode of Loading”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2057, pp.149-156,2008.
62.Baoshan Huang,Xiang Shu, and James Bass, ”Investigation of Simple Performance Characteristics of Plant-Produced Asphalt Mixtures in Tennessee”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2057, pp.140-148,2008.
63.Adam Zofka,Mihai O.Marasteanu, and Mugurel Turos, ”Determination of Asphalt Mixture Creep Compliance at Low Temperatures by Using Thin Beam Specimens”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2057, pp.134-139,2008.
64.Gerardo W.,Flintsch,Amara Loulizi,Stacey D.Diefenderfer,Brian K. Diefenderfer,and Khaled A.Galal, ”Asphalt Material Characterization in Support of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation in Virginia”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2057, pp.114-125,2008.
65.Luis G.Diaz and Adrian R.Archilla, ”Effect of Laboratory Data Range Selection in Permanent Deformation Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2057, pp.126-133,2008.
66.林芳吉,「鋼結構橋梁ASD與LRFD設計程式之建立與比較」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,台南,2003。
67.ASCE,Guildlines for the design of cable-stayed bridges,American Society of Civil Engineering,1992.
68.徐耀賜,「鋼橋設計原理」,全華科技圖書股份有限公司,台北市,1999。