| 研究生: |
陳學瑜 Hsueh-Yu Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
模具設計對鋼板及鋁板在自沖鉚接特性影響之實驗及數據研究:數據庫構建方法及應用 Experimental and numerical investigation into the impact of die design on the characteristics of self-piercing riveting of steel and aluminum sheets: A database construction approach |
| 指導教授: |
傅尹坤
Yiin-Kuen Fuh |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系 Department of Mechanical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 73 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 自衝鉚釘 、鋁合金 、高強度鋼 、有限元素分析 、鎖緊值 、拉伸試驗 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Self-pierce riveting, Aluminum alloy, High-strength steel, Finite element analysis, Interlock, Shear test |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:9 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究透過實驗與數值分析探討板材厚度與模具設計對自沖鉚接(SPR)品質的影響,並提升鋼與鋁合金接合品質以及建構和擴展自沖鉚接數據庫。本研究事先運用有限元素分析軟體Qfrom,分析自沖鉚接的成型狀況並驗證模具的鉚接能力。於實驗中,選用高強度鋼為上層板材,鋁為下層板材,探討不同板材厚度與模具類型對於自沖鉚接參數的影響。透過測量鎖緊值(Interlock)與剩餘厚度(Remaining thickness),得以從線切割(WEDM)之樣品中初步評估鉚接品質,經量測本實驗達到最大0.72mm的鎖緊值和0.85mm的剩餘厚度。由於過往研究鮮少提及自沖鉚接參數調整對於抗拉強度的影響,因此本研究將進行剪切測試以更準確評估接合品質;經實驗得到最大剪切強度值為9872N。本研究之創新之處在於擴大自沖鉚接品質視窗之範圍,提出了更廣的失效概率(Failure probability)、鎖緊值與創新的抗拉強度值範圍。本研究將dR/(tt+dd)取值範圍從原始的0.95-1.05擴大到0.75-1.35,tR/tt值從0.2-0.28擴大到0.28-0.6,使其在業界中具有更廣泛的應用性。最後,我們提出了新的抗拉強度值視窗,以便汽車產業在製造設計過程中選取適當的板材組合。
This research explores the impact of sheet thickness and die design variations on the self-piercing riveting (SPR) process's feasibility and quality, particularly for steel-to-aluminum stacks. By utilizing finite element analysis software Qform to simulate the SPR process, and conducting experiments with high-strength steel and aluminum sheets of varying thicknesses and dies, the results broadened our understanding of SPR process parameters. The quality of the riveting was assessed through measurements of interlock values and remaining thicknesses, the results indicating significant improvements over previous studies. Specifically, the results achieved an interlock value of 0.72mm and a remaining thickness of 0.85mm. Since previous studies rarely mentioned the influence of tensile strength on various parameters, this research performed shear tests to accurately assess joint quality, yielding a maximum strength of 9872N. This study extends the SPR processing window, proposing expanded ranges for failure probability, interlock values, and new shear strength value windows. The dR/(tt+dd) value range was extended from the original 0.95-1.05 to 0.75-1.35, and the tR/tt value was extended from 0.2-0.28 to 0.28-0.6. This broader range enhances SPR's industrial applicability. Additionally, new strength value windows were proposed for improved sheet combination selection in the manufacturing design process.
[1] N. Karathanasopoulos, Kedar S. Pandya, D. Mohr, "An experimental and numerical investigation of the role of rivet and die design on the self-piercing riveting joint characteristics of aluminum and steel sheets," Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Volume 69, 2021, Pages 290-302.
[2] Myung D , Noh W , Kim J-H , Kong J , Hong S-T , Lee M-G . "Probing the mechanism of friction stir welding with ALE based finite element simulations and its application to strength prediction of welded aluminum." Met Mater Int 2021;27(4):650–66.
[3] "The influence of reaction layer on the strength of aluminum/steel joint welded by resistance spot welding."
[4] "Development of an end-to-end simulation process chain for prediction of self-piercing riveting joint geometry and strength."
[5] Johnson P. "Quality control and nondestructive testing of self-piercing riveted joints in aerospace and other applications." In: Chaturvedi M, editor. Welding and joining of aerospace materials. 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing; 2012. p. 363–81.
[6] Jeon, N.-K.; Rhee, S.; Kam, D.-H. "Parametric Study of Self-Piercing Riveting for CFRP-Aluminum Dissimilar Joint." J. Weld. Join. 2018, 36, 8.
[7] He X, Zhao L, Deng C, Xing B, Gu F, Ball A. "Self-piercing riveting of similar and dissimilar metal sheets of aluminum alloy and copper alloy." Mater Des 2015;65:923–33.
[8] He X, Wang Y, Lu Y, Zeng K, Gu F, Ball A. "Self-piercing riveting of similar and dissimilar titanium sheet materials." Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2015;80(9):2105–15.
[9] Jeong, T.-E.; Kim, M.-G.; Rhee, S.; Kam, D.-H. "Joint quality study of self-piercing riveted aluminum and steel joints depending on the thickness and strength of base metal." J. Weld. Join. 2019, 37, 212.
[10] Haque, R. "Residual Stress and Deformation in SPR Joints of High Strength Materials." Ph.D. Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia, 2014.
[11] Nikolaos Karathanasopoulos, Dirk Mohr, "Strength and Failure of Self-Piercing Riveted Aluminum and Steel Sheet Joints: Multi-axial Experiments and Modeling," Journal of Advanced Joining Processes, Volume 5, 2022, 100107.
[12] Rezwanul Haque, "Quality of self-piercing riveting (SPR) joints from cross-sectional perspective: A review," Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Volume 18, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 83-93.
[13] Rao, H., Kang, J., Huff, G., Avery, K. et al., "Impact of Rivet Head Height on the Tensile and Fatigue Properties of Lap Shear Self-Pierced Riveted CFRP to Aluminum," SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 10(2):167-173, 2017.
[14] Lim, Y. C., Chen, J., Jun, J., Leonard, D. N., Brady, M. P., Warren, C. D., and Feng, Z. (October 23, 2020). "Mechanical and Corrosion Assessment of Friction Self-Piercing Rivet Joint of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer and Magnesium Alloy AZ31B." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. March 2021; 143(3): 031006.
[15] Jeong, T.-E.; Kam, D.-H.; Kim, C. "Parametric Investigation of Effect of Abnormal Process Conditions on Self-Piercing Riveting." Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2520.
[16] Ang, H.Q. "An Overview of Self-piercing Riveting Process with Focus on Joint Failures, Corrosion Issues and Optimization Techniques." Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 34, 2 (2021).
[17] Zhou, Z.-J.; Huang, Z.-C.; Jiang, Y.-Q.; Tang, N.-L. "Joining Properties of SPFC440/AA5052 Multi-Material Self-Piercing Riveting Joints." Materials 2022, 15, 2962.
[18] Kam, D.H.; Jeong, T.E.; Kim, J. "A Quality Study of a Self-Piercing Riveted Joint between Vibration-Damping Aluminum Alloy and Dissimilar Materials." Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5947.