跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉瑞斌
Jui-Pin Liu
論文名稱: 電力產業自由化下合理電價之探討
The Study of reasonable electricity prices under deregulation in Taiwan
指導教授: 鄭有為
Yu-Wei Cheng
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所在職專班
Executive Master of Industrial Economics
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 295
中文關鍵詞: 電力產業國營事業電力公司電價自由化公用事業電業法電業
外文關鍵詞: CPI-X, electricity industry, liberalization, Electricity Act, price-cap, rate-of-return, deregulation, RPI-X
相關次數: 點閱:11下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 現行的電業法下,我國只有一家國營的台灣電力公司負擔全國發、輸、配電之任務,我國過去對電力公司合理利潤的規範有其歷史背景,我國的電價以及電業經營所收取之相關費率,依電業法規定,需經過中央主管機關核定,加以台電公司屬於國營事業,訂定費率又受國營事業管理法所限制。現行電價是依據成本加成定價的精神做制訂,成本加成的定價方式,有保障利潤的優點,不可避免的會伴隨著經營效率低落的問題。根據行政院研擬之電業法修正草案,我國電力產業即將邁向自由化,電力產業將不同於現今之國營事業垂直壟斷的局面。電力產業邁向自由化,其所導引的市場機制,會促使電價降低,電業自由化下的電價制度是提供何種誘因,讓業者能獲取合理利潤,並有動機提升自身經營效率?參考國外電業自由化經驗,英國對於電業自由化後,規範電價的方式為設置電價上限公式:RPI-X。適用於我國可修正為CPI-X(即電價的漲幅不超過物價指數減去X值)。電價管制採行電價上限公式,可導入激勵電業改善自身經營效率和主管機關對於電價能有效控管的優點,民眾能享受到因電業間競爭的利益,同時避免訊息不對稱而導致支出不必要的花費。


    Taiwan Power Company, a state-run enterprise, has been a vertically integrated firm monopolized electricity industry for 60 years in Taiwan. The Executive Yuan had submitted the draft of Electricity Act. According to the draft, the electricity industry were be deregulated. After implementation of electricity industry liberalization, Price-cap regulation should be introduced. Price-cap regulation, as an alternative to traditional rate -of-return regulation, developed as a practical regulatory tool in the early 1980s in Britain.
    A standard price-cap in the UK ( RPI-X ) or Taiwan ( CPI-X ) involves the regulator setting an initial maximum price. This maximum price then rises in line with the main index of retail prices (the retail price index in the UK and consumer price index in Taiwan), but falls at a rate X set in advance by the regulator.
    The value of X is meant to reflect potential cost savings by the electricity firm due to either increased efficiency or technological progress. The X factor enables these cost savings to be shared with consumers without adversely effecting the incentives of the firm to minimise and achieve these savings.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xii 一、緒論 1 1-1 研究背景與動機 1 1-2 研究目的與方法 6 二、電力產業自由化相關文獻探討 9 2-1 經濟學家對自由化的看法 9 2-2 電力產業自由化之理論 11 2-3 近年相關學位論文 14 三、國外電業自由化之發展 18 3-1 英國 18 3-1-1 英國電業改革回顧 18 3-1-2 英國電業現況 22 3-1-3 英國電業自由化之調整 29 3-2 美國 38 3-2-1 美國電業改革回顧 38 3-2-2 美國電業現況 45 3-2-3 美國電業自由化之調整 58 3-3 歐盟 80 3-3-1 歐盟電業改革回顧 80 3-3-2 歐盟電業現況 83 3-3-3 歐盟電業自由化之調整 86 3-4 法國 91 3-4-1 法國電業改革回顧 91 3-4-2 法國電業現況 93 3-4-3 法國電業自由化之調整 98 3-5 紐西蘭 103 3-5-1 紐西蘭電業改革回顧 103 3-5-2 紐西蘭電業現況 105 3-5-3 紐西蘭電業自由化之調整 108 3-6 小結 112 四、我國電力產業 115 4-1 台電公司經營現況 115 4-2 民間參與電業 125 4-2-1 台電公司開放民營 125 4-2-2 民間發電 126 4-3 未來發展 135 4-3-1 電業自由化之進行 135 4-3-2 綠色電價之導入 138 五、電價管制 141 5-1 電價管制之理由 141 5-2 影響電價訂定之因素 144 5-3 電價訂定之方式 161 5-4 合理利潤之探討 166 5-4-1 我國法規 166 5-4-2 英國之規範 171 5-4-3 北美洲地區之管制 189 六、電價結構 204 6-1 電價與供電成本 204 6-2 基本費及超約附加費 211 6-3 功率因數調整條款 217 6-4電價調整 221 6-4-1 公用事業費率之審議 221 6-4-2 電價調整之依據(法源) 224 6-4-3 電力費率之探討 225 七、電業法修正之探討 233 7-1 電業法修法歷程 233 7-2 未來電業自由化之方式 257 7-3 我國電業之改變 260 7-4 小結 268 八、結論 271 參考文獻 276

    [1]楊士炫,『我國推動電業法修正案合法化過程之研究』,東海大學,行政管理暨政策學系,碩士論文,2008
    [2]鄧淑瑜,『因應電業自由化下台電公司經營策略之探討』,實踐大學,企業管理研究所,碩士論文,2008
    [3]陳蒼賢,『電業自由化後台灣電力公司競爭優勢策略之探討』,中興大學,高階經理人碩士在職專班,碩士論文2007
    [4]張穎潮,『電業自由化及民營化下電力業者行銷策略之實證研究-以大用量客戶為對象』,靜宜大學,管理碩士在職專班,碩士論文,2007
    [5]Joskow, P. “Lessons Learned from Electricity Market
    Liberalization,” The Energy Journal, Special Issue on the Future of Electricity, pp. 9-42, 2008.
    [6]Littlechild, S.C. “Wholesale-Spot Pass Through” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(1), pp.61-91, 2003.
    [7]Littlechild, S.C. “Competition and contracts in the Nordic residential electricity markets.” Utilities Policy, 14(3), pp.135-147, September 2006
    [8]Richard Green & David M.Newbery, "Competition in the Electricity Industry in England and Wales" Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol.13(1), pp. 27-46, Spring 1997
    [9]David M, Newbery,“Electricity liberalisation in Britain: The quest for a satisfactory wholesale market design”, The Energy Journal:European Electricity Liberalisation (Special Issue), pp.43-70, 2005
    [10]Williams.B & A.Matheny, Democracy, Dialogue, and Environmental Disputes: The Contested Languages of Social Regulation, Yale University Press, pp.93, 1993
    [11]Claude Crampes, Jean-Jaques Laffont, ”Transport Princing In The Electricity Industry”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(3), pp.313-328, Autumn 2001.
    [12]Michael Goggin,“Curtailment, Negative Prices Symptomatic of Inadequate Transmission”,September 2008
    available at http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea//news/article/2008/09/curtailment-negative-prices-symptomatic-of-inadequate-transmission-53616
    [13]Tooraj Jamasb & Michael Pollitt,“Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization & Integration”, The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 26(Special I), pp.11-42, 2005
    [14]Bradley, I. and C. Price, “Economic Regulation of Private Monopolies through Price Constraints”, Journal of Industrial Economics, XXXVII(1), pp.99-106, 1988
    [15]Bradley, I. and C. Price, “Average Revenue Regulation and Regional Price Structure”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21(1): pp.89-108, 1991
    [16]Littlechild, S. C. "The structure of telephone tariffs", International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, 1(4), pp.365-377, December 1983
    [17]Ofgem,“Electricity Distribution Price Control Review: Final Proposals”, pp.139-154, 2004
    available at
    http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Pages/MoreInformation.aspx?docid=371&refer=NETWORKS/ELECDIST/PRICECNTRLS/DPCR5
    [18]Beesley, M. and Littlechild, S.“The regulation of privatized monopolies in the United Kingdom”, RAND Journal of Economics, vol.20, pp.454-472, 1989
    [19]Burns, P. and Weyman Jones, T.“Cost functions and cost efficiency in electricity distribution: a stochastic frontier approach”, Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 48, pp.44-64, 1996
    [20]Cross, Phillip S.“2008 ROE Surevy: Rates, Risks & Regulators.”Public Utilities Fortnightly, 146(11), pp.24-31, November 2008
    [21]Giulietti, M., and C. Waddams Price, “Incentive regulation, competition and relative prices”, Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 76(1), pp.121-149, 2005
    [22]Giulietti, M., C. Waddams Price, and M. Waterson,“Consumer choice and competition policy:a study of UK energy markets”, Economic Journal, 115, pp.49-969, October 2005
    [23]Green, R.J., “Electricity and Markets” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(1), pp.67-87, 2005
    [24]Chris M. Wilson and Catherine Waddams Price,“Do Consumers Switch to the Best Supplier?”, CCP working paper 07-6, 2007
    available at
    http://www.uea.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.104586!ccp07-6.pdf
    [25]Green, R. and T. McDaniel,“Competition in Electricity Supply: will ‘1998’ be worth it?” Fiscal Studies, 19(3), pp.273-293, 1998
    [26]Ofgem,“Ofgem Launches Probe into Energy Supply Markets”, 2008
    available at
    http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Media/PressRel/Documents1/ProbeFINAL.pdf
    [27]Ofgem,“Switching rate hits 5.1 million in 2007”, July 2008
    available at
    http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Media/PressRel/Documents1/Switching%20figures%202007.pdf
    [28]Phillip S.C.“Rates, Risks & Regulators”,
    Public Utilities Fortnightly,pp.24-31, 2008
    [29]“World Energy Retail Market Ranking”,
    Utility Customer Switching Research Project, 4th Edition, pp.4-18, October 2008
    available at
    http://www.eraa.com.au/db_uploads/2008_VaasaReport_Final.pdf
    [30]張玉山、李淳,『公用事業管制革新與管制組織的重新定位:以電力事業為例』,管制革新,中央研究院人文社會科學研究所專書,251-281頁,2001
    [31]王京明、郭婷婷,『電業自由化後台電公司供電義務與用戶
    購電選擇權之採討與因應』,台電工程月刊,第658期,35~46
    頁,2003
    [32]許志義,『台灣電價制度之探討』,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第5卷第1期,155-168頁,1999
    [33]許志義,『水電瓦斯公用事業解除管制政策芻議』,台灣銀行
    季刊,第57卷第2期,79-111頁,2006
    [34]謝明振,『台灣公營事業民營化之研究』,東吳經濟商學學報,第十四期,187-210頁,2006
    [35]台電60年特刊,台電公司,2006
    [36]98年負載管理年報,台電公司,2009
    [37]98年台電電源開發方案,台電公司,2009
    [38]台灣電力公司未來十年經營策略(99至108年),台電公司,2008

    QR CODE
    :::