台灣早期廢棄物管理政策從「管末處理」提升到現階段的「零廢棄」
為主軸，強調「源頭減量」與「資源回收再利用」，與國際上重視物質永續利用之趨勢相符合。行政院環保署於96 年起分屬於第三階段營建工地列管，本研究調查申報資料 100 年度營建廢棄物產生量約155 萬噸。
本研究調查再利用機構分類處理營建混合物R-0503之產生、處理、機構機具與處理能力及成品去化為首要課題，調查現行執行與管理機制，來提升再生資源使用成效。對再生物料分類處理者、再生物料使用者(再生綠建材)為問卷填答對象，調查填答者對於營建再生物料檢驗、成本、執行管理考慮準則，以李克特五尺度問卷進行調查。
再利用機構收受各類工程來源比例新建工程(84%)、拆除工程(13%)、裝潢修繕工程(1.2%)、其他(1.8%)，其中土石方、廢棄混凝土塊、廢磚佔營建資源出場達78%，目前再利用操作執行以施工便道、回填為，主總量龐大且資源化效果不佳，大多付費運送到土資場作為處理。
在碳排放量計算，運距是一個重要的影響因子，可初步得知廢棄物由營建工地運至分類處理廠需要跨縣市運送；而分類處理後之再生資源運至買方指定地點多在處理廠所在縣市進行再利用。
再生綠建材問卷調查要顯著因子為政府優惠補助、機關優先採購環境保護產品辦法、分項工程-植栽工程、購入材料無毒性，兩者看法有一致性且屬高分數群，在分項工程中皆認為不適用於結構工程中、認為綠建材標章較不合乎市場需求，在法令上強制規定消費者使用綠建材或強制添加再生材料之比率大部分的人較不同意，有大部分人員認為國家家標準CNS不太符合綠建材產品需求，此方面有待建築中心宣導，相關新訂定之評定綠建材項目。

In the early of Taiwan, the management policy of salvaged material have been risen from end-of-pipe to zero waste policy which is the current project. It is focus on Source Reduction and resource recycling reuse and the international importance to the sustainable use of the material conform to the trend. Starting from 96, Environmental Protection Administration(EPA) which is the third stage of construction site, according from the study of the construction waste has been produced approximately 155 ton in 100.
his project is to research the producing and management of classification pressing, construction mixture R0503, which is from recycling organization. Also, the organization equipment, handling ability and finished products has become the first topic. This investigation of executive and management mechanism is to increase the effective of the recycling. This questionnaire survey takes the users and organizations of the renewable material as our respondents. The author for construction survey in the biological material inspection, cost, and executive management consider ethics to Likert five scale in questionnaires.
In the use of all kinds of engineering source from institutions proportion is new Construction 84%, Demolition 13%, Household Renovation 1.2%, and others 1.8%. One cubic metro, and abandon the waste concrete piece, and waste brick stand for construction resources of 78%. Currently in use operational execution to backfill the pavement construction, the total amount is large and it was not work effectively; mostly transported to the land, capital and pay a to do processing.
In carbon emissions calculation, distance is an important factors, and can be learned by construction site preliminary waste shipment to the classification plant needs to cross the line delivery: The renewable material which had been classified shipped to the place where designated by the buyer, most of them is recycled in the counties where have treatment plants.
The significant factors of the renewable green building material survey are the government subsidies Regulations for Priority Procurement of Eco-Products, kinds of construction-Landscape, and purchasing non-toxic materials. Both views have consistency and in the high score groups. It is considered in kinds of construction not suitable for structural and the renewable green building material doesn’t meet market demand. Most of people disagree to set up legislation to enforce user to use green building material or adding the proportion of recycled materials. The majority of people think the national standard CNS is not correspond to the needs of green building material. At this aspect, the promotion and related policies will be set up to evaluate green building material project by the building center.

1.環境保護署, 資源循環政策規劃（草案）. 2011.
2.環境保護署-全國資源回收再利用資訊網.
Available from: http://waste1.epa.gov.tw/ier_web/.
3.Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 1932.
4.香港環境保護署 (2012).
Available from: http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/cindex.html.
5.日本國土交通省 (2012). Available from: http://www.mlit.go.jp/.
6.中華人民共和國住房和城鄉建設部(2011) Available from: http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/.
7.美國環境保護署(2012). Available from: http://www.epa.gov/.
8.內政部營建署，「營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所設施、設備標準及評鑑方式暨淤泥處理規範之研究」，2007。
9.Poon, C. and D. Chan, The use of recycled aggregate in concrete in Hong Kong. Resources, conservation and recycling, 2007. 50(3): p. 293-305.
10.日本環保署. Available from: http://www.env.go.jp/.
11.新加坡國家環境局.
Available from: http://app2.nea.gov.sg/topics_waterpollution.aspx.
12.Northeast Waste Management Officials’Association, Construction & Demolition Waste Management in the Northeast in 2006. 2009/06/30.
13.英國環保署 (2012).
Available from: http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk.
14.英國環境食品和農村事務部 (2012). Available from: http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/environment/waste/wrfg09-condem/.
15.SIMM, J. and M. WINTER, Specification for the production of tyre bales for use in construction, in TRL STAFF PAPERS. 2007.
16.丹麥環境部.
17.Miljøstyrelsen, O.f., Affaldsstatistik 2009 og Fremskrivning af affaldsmængder 2011-2050. 2011.
18.Peng, C., D. Scorpio, and C. Kibert, Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations. Construction Management and Economics, 1997. 15(1): p. 49-58.
19.Darwin, D., S. Mindess, and J. Young, Concrete. 2003, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
20.陳明良，「建築產業廢棄物再利用之研究:臺北都會區建築廢棄物數量與種類之調查研究」。民85，碩士論文，國立台灣工業技術學院，台北市。
21.內政部建築研究所，「建築拆除污染及廢棄物產生現況與調查架構研究」。1998b， 研究案編號：MOIS871014。
22.楊朝平，「台灣營建副產物組成分析及其剩餘土石方性質調查（案例：埔里921震災及台中一般營建副產物）」， 第四屆舖面材料再生學術研討會；高苑技術學院土木工程系、中華舖面工程學會籌備會、中國土木水利工程學會舖面工程委員會。第103-110頁. 2000.
23.黃琮荏，「綠營建材料資源化再利用產業製程品質管理之研究」，2005，國立中央大學。
24.潘建舜，「營建廢棄物處理機構資源化產品流向管理之研究」，2011，國立中央大學。.
25.何坤憲，「營建剩餘土石方及混合物處理與再利用法制化之研究」，民93,碩士論文，國立中央大學營建管理研究所。
26.再利用者登記資料及身分核發資料查詢. Available from: http://waste.epa.gov.tw/ReuseCheck/ReuseCheck_qry.asp.
27.行政院環保署，「加強營建廢棄物回收再利用及流向管制計畫」，2011。
28.陳顯童，「綠營建材料收容處理場所營運管理及E 化之研究-以溪尾科技營建混合物處理場為」，Green constructs material take in dispose place operate administer and e melt of research---As si wei science and technology construct admixture processing place for example. 2009。
29.內政部建築研究所. 2010
Available from: http://bpl.abri.gov.tw/news_con.php?no=34&page=1.
30.財團法人台灣建築中心
Available from: http://www.tabc.org.tw/GBM/target.html.
31.葉禮旭，「營建廢棄物總量推估與源頭管理之研究」，2011，國立中央大學。
32.楊國樞, et al., 社會及行為科學研究法. 台北: 東華, 1989.
33.Steiger, J.H. and J.C. Lind. Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. 1980.
34.吳明隆, SPSS 統計應用學習實務: 問卷分析與應用統計. 2007.
35.Cronbach, L.J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951. 16(3): p. 297-334.
36.邱皓政, 量化研究與統計分析, 台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司. 2003.
37.Spearman, C., " General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 1904. 15(2): p. 201-292.
38.邱皓政, 結構方程模式-Lisrel 的理論, 技術與應用, 雙葉書廊, 台北. 2003.
39.蕭文龍, 多變量分析最佳入門實用書, 台北: 碁峰資訊. 2007.
40.吳明隆, SPSS 操作與應用: 變異數分析實務. 2007: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
41.陳正昌 and 程炳林, SPSS, SAS, BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用, 台北市, 五南圖書出版有限公司. 1998.
42.Giorgi, A., Convergence and divergence of qualitative and quantitative methods in psychology. Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology, 1975. 2: p. 72-79.
43.Pison, G., et al., Robust factor analysis. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2003. 84(1): p. 145-172.
44.Moore, D.a.L.S., Introduction to the Practice of Statistics SPSS Manual. 2005.
45.Widaman, K.F., Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1993. 28(3): p. 263-311.
46.黃財尉, 共同因素分析與主成份分析之比較. 彰化師大輔導學報, 2003(25): p. 63-86.
47.Costello, A.B. and J.W. Osborne, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2005. 10(7): p. 1-9.
48.Treiblmaier, H. and P. Filzmoser, Exploratory factor analysis revisited: How robust methods support the detection of hidden multivariate data structures in IS research. Information & management, 2010. 47(4): p. 197-207.