| 研究生: |
奧薩雅 Aulia Syarif Aziz |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
在模擬平台使用日常生活影片輔助 科學學習之開發與評估 The Development and Evaluation of a Simulation Platform Supporting Science Learning from Life Videos |
| 指導教授: |
劉晨鐘
Chen-Chung Liu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 網路學習科技研究所 Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 69 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 物理學習 、模擬 、影片 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Physics learning, simulation, video |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:7 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在此研究中,我們在Co-Sci物理模擬網站下,使用了YouTube API和設計了學習活動,來幫助學生學習物理。這個系統用於測試國小學生學習鐘擺的概念。此研究的目標為觀察學生透過模擬學習物理和藉由真實影片學習物理之間,兩者間學習的表現。我們也觀察了各小組學生對學習科學的概念、他們的學習行為,以及學習成就。參與此研究的實驗對象共為35 位學生,其中以不同的學習活動分為兩組,模擬搭配探究指引 (Simulation with Inquiry Guidance, SIG)組的17位學生,以及影片搭配問題解決 (Video with Problem Solving, VPS)組的18 位學生。每組使用不同的學習的媒體和教學法。經統計分析顯示兩組間學習成效並沒有顯著的差異。兩組學習成效也沒有顯著差異。研究限制和系統缺陷也被發現可以改進以用於未來的研究。
In this study, we implemented a video feature in the Co-Sci physics simulation website using YouTube API and developed learning activities to help students to learn physics. The system was tested on elementary school students learning pendulum concepts. The aims of this study were to investigate the learning performance between students that learn physics through simulation only and students that learn using simulation with real video. We also investigate students’ conceptions of learning science, their learning behavior, and the learning achievement in the respective group. Total participants in this study were 35 students which were divided into 2 groups, 17 students in Simulation with Inquiry Guidance (SIG) group and 18 students in Video with Problem Solving (VPS) group. Different learning medias and pedagogies were applied for each group. The statistical analysis result showed that there was no significant difference in learning outcome of the two groups. There was also no significant difference in learning achievement between the two groups. Study limitations and system weakness has been identified to be improved for the future works.
Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
Biggs, J. (1994). Student learning research and theory: Where do we currently stand. Improving student learning: Theory and practice, 1-19. England: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
Brown, D. (2008). Video modeling: combining dynamic model simulations with traditional video analysis. In American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) Summer Meeting.
Brown, D., & Cox, A. J. (2009). Innovative uses of video analysis. The Physics Teacher, 47(3), 145-150.
Bumbacher, E., Hossain, Z., Riedel-Kruse, I., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Design Matters: The Impact of Technology Design on Students’ Inquiry Behaviors. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS].
Cadmus Jr, R. R. (1990). A video technique to facilitate the visualization of physical phenomena. American Journal of Physics, 58(4), 397-399.
Campbell, J. O., Bourne, J. R., Mosterman, P. J., & Brodersen, A. J. (2002). The effectiveness of learning simulators for electronic laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 81–87.
Carlsen, D. D., & Andre, T. (1992). Use of a microcomputer simulation and conceptual change text to overcome student preconceptions about electric circuits. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19, 105–109.
Chang, C. J., Liu, C. C., Wu, Y. T., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. F., Chiu, B. C., ... & Wu, S. W. (2016, January). Students' perceptions on problem solving with collaborative computer simulation. In 24th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2016 (pp. 166-168). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Chang, K. E., Chen, Y. L., Lin, H. Y., & Sung, Y. T. (2008). Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1486-1498.
Christian, W., & Esquembre, F. (2007). Modeling physics with easy java simulations. The Physics Teacher, 45(8), 475-480.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of educational research, 64(1), 1-35.
Colaso, V., Kamal, A., Saraiya, P., North, C., McCrickard, S., & Shaffer, C. (2002). Learning and retention in data structures: A comparison of visualization, text, and combined methods. In Paper presented at the proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002 world conference on educational multimedia/hypermedia and educational telecommunications.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
Escalada, L. T., & Zollman, D. A. (1997). An investigation on the effects of using interactive digital video in a physics classroom on student learning and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 467-489.
Esquembre, F. (2004). Easy Java Simulations: A software tool to create scientific simulations in Java. Computer physics communications, 156(2), 199-204.
Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and instruction, 15(4), 485-529.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Jensen, D., Self, B., Rhymer, D., Wood, J., & Bowe, M. (2002). A rocky journey toward effective assessment of visualization modules for learning enhancement in engineering mechanics. Educational Technology & Society, 5, 150–162.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2008). Active learning: Cooperation in the classroom. The annual report of educational psychology in Japan, 47, 29-30.
Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151-185.
Kearney, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Constructivism as a referent in the design and development of a computer program using interactive digital video to enhance learning in physics. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 64-79.
Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191-220.
Luo, W., Stravers, J. A., & Duffin, K. L. (2005). Lessons learned from using a web-based interactive landform simulation model (WILSIM) in a general education physical geography course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 489–493.
Marton, F., & Säljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning, 40–58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Naps, T. L., Ro ̈ßling, G., Almstrum, V., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Hundhausen, C., et al. (2003). Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35, 131–152.
Oguz-Unver A, Arabacioglu S (2014). A comparison of inquiry-based learning (IBL), problem-based learning (PBL) and project-based learning (PJBL) in science education. Academia Journal of Educational Research 2(7): 120-128.
Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (1997). The development and validation of an instrument to assess students' conceptions of learning. In 7th Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.
Reamon, D., & Sheppard, S. (1997). The role of simulation software in an ideal learning environment. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences, September 14–17, Sacramento, CA.
Regan, M., & Sheppard, S. (1996). Interactive multimedia courseware and the hands-on learning experience: An assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 123–131.
Rieber, L. P., Boyce, M., & Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 46–52.
Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation – A bridge between theory and reality: The case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 14–26.
Saljo, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s Perspective, 1: Some commonsense conceptions. Gothenburg, Sweden: Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation‐driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.
Searle, P. & Gunstone, R. (1990). Conceptual change and physics instruction: a longitudinal study. ERIC Document, ED 320 767.
Tao, P. & Gunstone, R. (1997). The process of conceptual change in ‘Force and Motion’. ERIC Document, ED 407 259.
Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733-1750.
White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London and New York: TheFalmer Press.
Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics today, 58(11), 36-41.
Zollman, D., & Fuller, R. (1994). Teaching and learning physics with interactive video.