跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張余安
Yu-An Chang
論文名稱: 主管跨文化融合之道:如何塑造員工信任、緩解工作壓力與促進建言行為
Cross-Cultural Integration for Supervisor: To Cultivate Employee Trust, Decrease Job Stress and Encourage Voice Behavior
指導教授: 王群孝
Chun-Hsiao Wang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
Executive Master of Human Resource Management
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 63
中文關鍵詞: 跨文化管理文化差距彌合行為工作壓力建言行為意願信任感
外文關鍵詞: Cross-cultural management, Cultural Gap Bridging Behaviors, Job Stress, Voice Behavior, Trust
相關次數: 點閱:19下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 國際化是許多企業發展及拓展業務無可避免的趨勢,受少子化人力短缺的影響,人才跨國間的流動越趨頻繁,職場上不同文化的交流越來越常見,而組織的文化多樣性可帶來許多新的發想及創新,但也帶來許多因誤解或差異而產生的衝突。因此,在跨文化團隊中,主管如何透過文化管理行為,使團隊合作更順暢,並解決團隊衝突,將是未來許多跨國組織常見的挑戰。而主管的管理行為對於部屬在工作上的感知,包含信任感、工作壓力及建言行為,皆有深刻的影響,若在跨文化團隊中,主管能透過跨文化管理行為,提升員工對主管的信任,降低其工作壓力並促進建言行為的意願,將使跨國組織運作更順暢。本文研究以目前在跨文化團隊中任職人員為研究對象,透過線上問卷進行調查,共回收有效樣本190份,並進行分析。
    研究結果發現:
    1. 在跨國籍的情況下,主管的文化差距彌合行為與部屬對主管的信任有正向顯著關係。
    2. 在跨國籍的情況下,主管的文化差距彌合行為與員工建言行為意願有正向顯著關係。
    3. 在跨國籍的情況下,部屬對主管的信任與員工建言行為意願有正向顯著關係。
    4. 在跨國籍的情況下,部屬對主管的信任在主管的文化差距彌合行為與員工建言行為意願關係中,扮演中介角色。
    5. 在跨國籍的情況下,主管的文化差距彌合行為與員工工作壓力有負向顯著關係。
    6. 在跨國籍的情況下,部屬對主管的信任與員工工作壓力有負向顯著關係。
    7. 在跨國籍的情況下,部屬對主管的信任在主管的文化差距彌合行為與員工工作壓力關係中,扮演中介角色。


    Internationalization is an unavoidable trajectory for numerous enterprises seeking expansion and diversification. Influenced by the shortage of manpower due to declining birth rates, talent migration across borders has surged. Consequently, intercultural communication in the workplace is becoming more common. The diversity of organizational cultures can inspire new ideas and innovations, yet it also create conflicts arising from misunderstandings or differences. Therefore, in cross-cultural teams, how supervisors manage cultural behaviors to facilitate smoother cooperation and resolve conflicts within teams will be a common challenge for many multinational organizations in the future. Supervisors' managerial conduct significantly shapes subordinates' workplace perceptions, including trust, stress, and voice behavior. If supervisors in cross-cultural teams can enhance subordinates' trust through cross-cultural management behaviors, reduce their job stress, and promote their willingness to speak up, the multinational organizations will be more efficient. This study focuses on employees currently working in cross-cultural teams, utilizing an online questionnaire survey for data collection, with a total of 190 valid responses collected and analyzed.

    The research findings are as follows:

    1. Under multinational circumstances, supervisors' cultural gap bridging behaviors positively and significantly influence subordinates' trust in supervisors.
    2. Under multinational circumstances, supervisors' cultural gap bridging behaviors positively and significantly influence subordinates' voice behavior.
    3. Under multinational circumstances, subordinates' trust in supervisors positively and significantly influences subordinates' voice behavior.
    4. Under multinational circumstances, subordinates' trust in supervisors mediates the relationship between supervisors' cultural gap bridging behaviors and subordinates' voice behavior.
    5. Under multinational circumstances, supervisors' cultural gap bridging behaviors negatively and significantly influence employees' job stress.
    6. Under multinational circumstances, subordinates' trust in supervisors negatively and significantly influences employees' job stress.
    7. Under multinational circumstances, subordinates' trust in supervisors mediates the relationship between supervisors' cultural gap bridging behaviors and employees' job stress.

    目 錄 摘 要 iv Abstract vi 誌 謝 viii 目 錄 ix 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xii 一、緒論 - 1 - 1-1 研究動機 - 1 - 1-2 研究目的 - 4 - 1-3 研究流程 - 5 - 二、文獻探討 - 6 - 2-1 主管的文化差距彌合行為(Cultural Gap Bridging Behaviors)的理論及意義 - 6 - 2-2 部屬對主管的信任的理論及意義 - 8 - 2-3 員工工作壓力的理論及意義 - 9 - 2-4 員工建言行為意願的理論及意義 - 10 - 2-5 主管的文化差距彌合行為、部屬對主管的信任、員工工作壓力與員工建言行為意願間的關係探討 - 10 - 2-6 員工海外經驗(求學/工作)年資的調節效果影響 - 14 - 三、研究方法 - 15 - 3-1 研究架構與假設 - 15 - 3-2 研究變項衡量 - 16 - 3-3 研究方法 - 25 - 四、研究結果 - 27 - 4-1 樣本分析 - 27 - 4-2 信度分析 - 29 - 4-3 效度分析 - 30 - 4-4 相關分析 - 33 - 4-5 迴歸分析 - 35 - 4-6 研究假設結果 - 38 - 五、結論及建議 - 40 - 5-1 研究意涵 - 40 - 5-2 管理意涵 - 41 - 5-3 研究限制與未來研究之建議 - 43 - 六、參考文獻 - 45 - 6-1 英文文獻 - 45 - 6-2 中文文獻 - 49 -

    6-1 英文文獻
    1. Backmann, J., Kanitz, R., Tian, A.W., Hoffmann, P., & Hoegl, M. (2020). Cultural gap bridging in multinational teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-29.
    2. Bartel-Radic, A., & Munch, F. (2023). Cross-cultural boundary spanning activities in a global team: Insights from an ethnographic case study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 23(2), 339-365.
    3. Behfar, K., Kern, M., & Brett, J. (2006). Managing challenges in multicultural teams. In National Culture and Groups (pp. 233-262). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. Bernardo, A. B., & Presbitero, A. (2018). Cognitive flexibility and cultural intelligence: Exploring the cognitive aspects of effective functioning in culturally diverse contexts. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 66, 12-21.
    5. Bokti, N. L. M., & Talib, M. A. (2009). A Preliminary Study on Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction among Male Navy Personnel at a Naval Base in Lumut, Malaysia. Journal of International Social Research, 2(9), 299-307.
    6. Butler, C. L., Zander, L., Mockaitis, A., & Sutton, C. (2012). The Global Leader as Boundary Spanner, Bridge Maker, and Blender. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 240–243.
    7. Cheng, J., Lu, K., Chang, Y., & Johnstone, S. (2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of supervisor‐attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51, 81-102.
    8. Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Grabowski, D., Czerw, A., & Stasiła-Sieradzka, M. (2022). Assessment of worklife areas, trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust as conditions of severity of stress at work. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 35(6), 719–730.
    9. Clark, M.C., & Payne, R.L. (1997). The nature and structure of workers' trust in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(3), 205-224.
    10. Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596-607.
    11. Friedman, R., Liu, W., Chi, S. C. S., Hong, Y. Y., & Sung, L. K. (2012). Cross-cultural management and bicultural identity integration: When does experience abroad lead to appropriate cultural switching?. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(1), 130-139.
    12. Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 787-798.
    13. Guinot, J., Chiva, R., & Roca-Puig, V. (2014). Interpersonal trust, stress and satisfaction at work: an empirical study. Personnel Review, 43(1), 96-115. Zhou
    14. Gupta, N., & Beehr, T. A. (1979). Job stress and employee behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(3), 373-387.
    15. Harrison, N. (2012). Investigating the impact of personality and early life experiences on intercultural interaction in internationalised universities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(2), 224-237.
    16. Holland, P., Cooper, B. K., Pyman, A., & Teicher, J. (2012). Trust in management: The role of employee voice arrangements and perceived managerial opposition to unions. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 377-391.
    17. Hong, H. J. (2010). Bicultural competence and its impact on team effectiveness. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(1), 93-120.
    18. House, R. J., & Rizzo, J. R. (1972). Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7(3), 467-505.
    19. Hundschell, A., Backmann, J., Tian, A. W., & Hoegl, M. (2022). Leaders' cultural gap bridging behaviors and subordinates' work engagement in multinational teams. Journal of International Management, 28(3), 100916.
    20. Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801-830.
    21. Jamal, M. (1990). Relationship of Job Stress and Type-A Behavior to Employees' Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Psychosomatic Health Problems, and Turnover Motivation. Human Relations, 43, 727 - 738.
    22. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.
    23. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985.
    24. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    25. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
    26. Meagher, K., Wait, A. Trust in management in organizations. IZA World of Labor 2023: 507 doi: 10.15185/izawol.507
    27. Menon, B. G., Praveensal, C. J., & Madhu, G. (2015). Determinants of job stress in chemical process industry: A factor analysis approach. Work, 52(4), 855-864.
    28. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.
    29. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412.
    30. Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe Jr, H. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
    31. Omoankhanlen, J. A., & Eyakephovwan, M. E. (2022). Supervisor Behaviour and Job Stress among Bank Employees in Rivers State-Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(1), 20-27.
    32. Priyadarshani, S. A. S. (2022). Impact of Work Stress on Employee Performance: A Study among the Executive Officers of State Universities in Sri Lanka. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 11(1), 22–27.
    33. Prusak, L., & Cohen, D. (2001). How to invest in social capital. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 86-97.
    34. Rhee, K. Y. (2010). Different effects of workers’ trust on work stress, perceived stress, stress reaction, and job satisfaction between Korean and Japanese workers. Safety and Health at Work, 1(1), 87-97.7
    35. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
    36. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R.G. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53 - 55.
    37. Tenzer, H., Terjesen, S., & Harzing, A. W. (2017). Language in international business: A review and agenda for future research. Management International Review, 57(6), 815-854.
    38. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    39. Wang, D. S., & Hsieh, C. C. (2013). The effect of authentic leadership on employee trust and employee engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 41(4), 613-624.
    40. Yao, Y. H., Fan, Y. Y., Guo, Y. X., & Li, Y. (2014). Leadership, work stress and employee behavior. Chinese Management Studies, 8(1), 109-126.
    41. Yao, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, L., & Luo, J. (2020). Narcissistic leadership and voice behavior: The role of job stress, traditionality, and trust in leaders. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 543-563.
    42. Zhou, X., Liao, J. Q., Liu, Y., & Liao, S. (2017). Leader impression management and employee voice behavior: Trust and suspicion as mediators. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 45(11), 1843-1854.

    6-2 中文文獻
    1. 胡瑛麒、朱羽莛、何清治(2023)。組織信任對知覺領導風格與醫院員工建言行為之中介效果。醫學與健康期刊,12(3),23-35。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=23046856-N202311180003-00003
    2. 行政院主計總處(2023)。111年國人赴海外統計結果新聞稿。(https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3602&s=232723)
    3. 何佩珊(2023年9月)。台達電「裡應外合」3年國際人才翻1.5倍!招手海外員工先問:我們準備好了嗎。《商業周刊》第1870期。https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/Archive/Article?StrId=7008756&rf=google
    4. 林毅豐(2017)。家長式領導與組織認同感之關聯性研究-以信任主管為調節變項。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ncd83h。
    5. 紀乃文、李學佳(2018)。員工為何建言?探討員工利社會動機與印象管理動機對建言行為的影響:求成型焦點、情感性組織承諾與公民行為壓力的干擾效果。管理學報,35(1),1-25。
    6. 陳銘薰、游淑萍(2021)。團隊斷層對團隊信任、團隊知識分享影響之研究。商管科技季刊,22(2),147-183。
    7. 教育部國際及兩岸教育司(2023)。111年度世界各主要國家之我留學生人數統計。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2500/News_Content.aspx?n=2D25F01E87D6EE17&sms=4061A6357922F45A&s=8909A553ED67DF78
    8. 黃靖萱、孫珮瑜(2006年12月)。李焜耀的失敗學 — 明基能否谷底重生?天下雜誌。
    https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5110149
    9. 黃奕霖(2022年9月)。80%部門員工來自內部推薦,中租靠「MAGIC」化缺工為神奇。Cheers快樂工作人。
    https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5101207&page=2
    10. 黃亦筠(2023年11月)。亞利桑那直擊》台積美國廠兩大未爆彈,「台灣施工模式」為何水土不服?天下雜誌。
    https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5128055
    11. 黃莉芙(2013)。管理教練技能對員工工作焦慮之關聯性—以對主管信任為中介變項。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    12. 國家發展委員會(2023)。外國專業人員人數-按申請類別。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=00305E435F91FE1F
    13. 劉鎧豪(2015)。以順序分類模型探討臺灣跨國企業資訊揭露透明度〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。

    QR CODE
    :::