跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林挺毅
Ting-Yi Lin
論文名稱: 探索結論需求對獎勵計畫與忠誠度關聯性之影響
The Relation between Reward Programs and Loyalty: The Moderating Effect of Need for Closure
指導教授: 謝依靜
Yi-Ching Hsieh
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理學系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 結論需求獎勵時間性獎勵機率性獎勵明確性消費者忠誠度
外文關鍵詞: need for closure, reward timing, probability reward, precise reward, loyalty
相關次數: 點閱:10下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 購買,是每個人的日常生活中非常重要的行為。當產品或服務的選項相近時,消費者會選擇購買價值較高或能更符合消費者喜好的選項。獎勵計畫便是一種能有效提升消費者知覺價值的促銷方式。
    企業廣泛的使用獎勵計畫來提高收益和建立顧客忠誠度。當面臨眾多不同的獎勵計畫時,消費者會根據自己個人的偏好以及人格特質而做出不同的選擇。在過去的研究中指出,「結論需求(need for closure)」是一種可以用來了解消費者選擇和決策的個人特質。
    本研究透過對結論需求的程度來探討消費者對不同獎勵計畫的偏好和忠誠度,而獎勵計畫可依下列三種特性設計為不同類型:獎勵時間性(立即性/延遲性)、獎勵機率性(100%/50%)和獎勵明確性(明確/不明確)。主要研究結論歸納如下:首先對於不同時間性的獎勵,消費者不論結論需求的程度高或低都較為偏好立即性獎勵而非延遲性獎勵。第二,面對獎勵機率性和獎勵明確性時,高結論需求的消費者顯著偏好100%和明確獎勵,而低結論需求的消費者在此兩種獎勵間則沒有顯著的差異。最後,當獎勵兌換時間延長到下次消費時,高結論需求的消費者面對100%和明確獎勵時會顯著提高其忠誠度,而低結論需求的消費者在此兩種獎勵間則沒有顯著的忠誠度差異。


    Purchasing is an important behavior that nearly every people do in their daily lives. While the product or service choices are similar, customer will look for the product value which are more worthy or attracted to their demand. Reward programs are an effective way to engage customer's attention.
    Reward programs have become popularly used tools for managers to increase their revenue and build customer loyalty. While facing various reward programs, customers make decisions based on their preference and personal characteristic. According to previous research, "need for closure (NFC)" is an important variable of individual difference that influences customers' choice and decision.
    In this study, need for closure was used as a moderator to explore customer's preference and loyalty to different reward programs. We examined three characteristics of reward programs: reward timing (immediate/delayed), reward probability (100%/50%) and reward precision (precise/imprecise). The results of this study indicated that, first, regardless the level of NFC, respondents show preference to immediate rather than delayed reward. Second, when the rewards varied in probability and precision, respondents with high NFC significantly prefer to 100% and precise rewards, whereas, low NFC reveals no difference between high and low probability, and between high and low precision. Last, when the coupon usage was extended to next patronage, respondents with high NFC showed higher loyalty when they were provided 100% or precise rewards; conversely, respondents with low NFC showed no difference in loyalty.

    1.Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. Theory Background ............................................................................................................ 3 2-1. Need for Closure (NFC) ......................................................................................... 3 2-2. Customer Loyalty ................................................................................................... 4 2-3. Timing of Redemption ............................................................................................ 5 2-3-1. Timing of Redemption and Need for Closure ............................................ 6 2-4. Reward Probability ................................................................................................. 7 2-4-1. Reward Probability and Need for Closure .................................................. 8 2-5. Reward Precision .................................................................................................... 9 2-5-1. Reward Precision and Need for Closure................................................... 10 3. Research Methods ............................................................................................................ 12 3-1. Characteristic of Rewards ..................................................................................... 12 3-2. Pretest for the Value between Immediate Reward and Delayed Reward ............. 13 3-3. Measurement ........................................................................................................ 14 3-3-1. Need for Closure ....................................................................................... 14 3-3-2. Scale of Preference ................................................................................... 15 3-4. Sample .................................................................................................................. 15 3-5. Research design .................................................................................................... 17 3-5-1. The moderating effect of NFC on the preference for reward programs ... 17 3-5-2. The moderating effect of NFC on the relationship between reward program and customer loyalty .................................................................................. 18 4. Analysis and Results ......................................................................................................... 19 4-1. Reliability ............................................................................................................. 19 4-2. Validity ................................................................................................................. 20 4-3. Hypothesis Testing................................................................................................ 22 4-3-1. The moderating effect of NFC on the preference for reward programs ... 22 4-3-2. The moderating effect of NFC on the relationship between reward program and customer loyalty .................................................................................. 25 5. General Discussion ........................................................................................................... 27 5-1. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 27 5-2. Managerial Implications ....................................................................................... 29 5-3. Limitations and Future Research .......................................................................... 30 Reference ................................................................................................................................. 31 Appendix: Questionnaire .......................................................................................................... 38 iv List of Tables Table 1: Percentage of Discount for Immediate/Next Patronage ............................................. 13 Table 2: Demographics of Respondents ................................................................................... 16 Table 3: Reliability and Validity of Loyalty ............................................................................. 21 Table 4: Reliability and Validity of NFC .................................................................................. 21 Table 5: The Results of Hypothesized Model........................................................................... 26 List of Figures Figure 1: The hypothesis model for H1, H2 & H4 ................................................................... 12 Figure 2: The hypothesis model for H3 & H5 .......................................................................... 12 Figure 3: Preference for NFC and Reward Timing .................................................................. 23 Figure 4: Preference for NFC and Reward Probability ............................................................ 24 Figure 5: Preference for NFC and Reward Precision ............................................................... 24 Figure 6: Loyalty to NFC and Reward Probability .................................................................. 25 Figure 7: Loyalty to NFC and Reward Precision ..................................................................... 26

    [1]. Andreassen, Tor Wallin, & Lindestad, Bodil. (1998). Customer loyalty and complex
    services: the impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for
    customers with varying degrees of service expertise. International Journal of Service
    Industry Management, 9(1), 7-23.
    [2]. Bagozzi, Richard P, & Yi, Youjae. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation
    models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
    [3]. Bentler, Peter M, & Bonett, Douglas G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in
    the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588.
    [4]. Blattberg, Robert C, & Neslin, Scott A. (1990). Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods,
    and Strategies: Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    [5]. Boehner, Kirsten, & Hancock, Jeffrey T. (2006). Advancing Ambiguity. Paper presented
    at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems.
    [6]. Bollen, Kenneth A. (1998). Structural Equation Models: Wiley Online Library.
    [7]. Bolton, Ruth N, Kannan, P K & Bramlett, Matthew D. (2000). Implications of loyalty
    program membership and service experiences for customer retention and value. Journal
    of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 95-108.
    [8]. Bonnici, Joseph, Campbell, David P, Fredenberger, William B, & Hunnicutt, Kathryn H.
    (2011). Consumer issues in coupon usage: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Applied
    Business Research (JABR), 13(1), 31-40.
    [9]. Cabantous, Laure. (2007). Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers’ attitude
    to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates. Theory and Decision, 62(3), 219-240.
    [10]. Chen, Rong, & Jia, Jianmin. (2005). Consumer choices under small probabilities:
    overweighting or underweighting? Marketing Letters, 16(1), 5-18.
    [11]. Choi, Sungchul, Ge, Xin, & Messinger, Paul R. (2010). Consumer perceptions of
    ambiguous price promotions: scratch and save promotions versus tensile price claims.
    Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(7), 477-486.
    33
    [12]. De Grada, Eraldo, Kruglanski, Arie W, Mannetti, Lucia, & Pierro, Antonio. (1999).
    Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and
    processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(4),
    346-365.
    [13]. Delgado, Mauricio R, Miller, Melinda M, Inati, Souheil, & Phelps, Elizabeth A. (2005).
    An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning. Neuroimage, 24(3), 862-873.
    [14]. Dhar, Sanjay K, González-Vallejo, Claudia, & Soman, Dilip. (1999). Modeling the
    effects of advertised price claims: tensile versus precise claims? Marketing Science,
    18(2), 154-177.
    [15]. Dhar, Sanjay K, Gonzalez-Vallejo, Claudia, & Soman, Dilip. (1995). Brand promotions
    as a lottery. Marketing Letters, 6(3), 221-233.
    [16]. Dick, Alan S, & Basu, Kunal. (1994). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual
    framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99-113.
    [17]. Estle, Sara J, Green, Leonard, Myerson, Joel, & Holt, Daniel D. (2007). Discounting of
    monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psychological Science, 18(1), 58-63.
    [18]. Fornell, Claes. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish
    experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1).
    [19]. Fornell, Claes, & Larcker, David F. (1981). Structural equation models with
    unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of
    Marketing Research, 382-388.
    [20]. Fritz, Wolfgang, Mollenberg, Antje, & Chen, Guo-Ming. (2001). Measuring Intercultural
    Sensitivity in Different Cultural Context.
    [21]. Gan, WQ, Man, SFP, Senthilselvan, A, & Sin, DD. (2004). Association between chronic
    obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: a systematic review and a
    meta-analysis. Thorax, 59(7), 574-580.
    [22]. Ganesh, Jaishankar, Arnold, Mark J, & Reynolds, Kristy E. (2000). Understanding the
    34
    customer base of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers
    and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65-87.
    [23]. Green, Leonard, & Myerson, Joel. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with
    delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769.
    [24]. Hair, Joseph F, Anderson, Rolph E, Tatham, Ronald L, & William, C. (1998). Black
    (1998), Multivariate data analysis: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [25]. Harlam, Bari A, Krishna, Aradhna, Lehmann, Donald R, & Mela, Carl. (1995). Impact of
    bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. Journal
    of Business Research, 33(1), 57-66.
    [26]. Ho, Joanna LY, Keller, L Robin, & Keltyka, Pamela. (2002). Effects of outcome and
    probabilistic ambiguity on managerial choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(1),
    47-74.
    [27]. Ho, Richard, Huang, Leo, Huang, Stanley, Lee, Tina, Rosten, Alexander, & Tang,
    Christopher S. (2009). An approach to develop effective customer loyalty programs: The
    VIP program at T&T Supermarkets Inc. Managing Service Quality, 19(6), 702-720.
    [28]. Houghton, David C, & Grewal, Rajdeep. (2000). Please, let's get an answer—any
    answer: Need for consumer cognitive closure. Psychology & Marketing, 17(11), 911-
    934.
    [29]. Hu, Li‐ tze, & Bentler, Peter M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance
    structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation
    Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    [30]. Keh, Hean Tat, & Lee, Yih Hwai. (2006). Do reward programs build loyalty for
    services?: The moderating effect of satisfaction on type and timing of rewards. Journal
    of Retailing, 82(2), 127-136.
    [31]. Kivetz, Ran, & Simonson, Itamar. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a
    determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of
    35
    Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170.
    [32]. Kossowska, M., Van Hiel, A., Chun, W. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The need for
    cognitive closure scale: Structure, cross-cultural invariance, and comparison of mean
    ratings between European-American and East Asian samples. Psychologica
    Belgica, 42(4), 267-286.
    [33]. Krosnick, Jon A. (2002). The causes of no-opinion responses to attitude measures in
    surveys: They are rarely what they appear to be. Survey Nonresponse, 87-100.
    [34]. Kruglanski, Arie W. (1989). Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and
    motivational bases: Plenum Press.
    [35]. Kruglanski, Arie W. (1996). A motivated gatekeeper of our minds: Need-for-closure
    effects on interpersonal and group processes.
    [36]. Kruglanski, Arie W, Atash, M, DeGrada, Eraldo, Mannetti, Lucia, Pierro, Antonio, &
    Webster, Donna M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric naysaying:
    Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale.
    [37]. Kruglanski, Arie W, & Webster, Donna M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind:"
    Seizing" and" freezing.". Psychological Review, 103(2), 263.
    [38]. Kumar, Victor, & Shah, Denish. (2004). Building and sustaining< i> profitable</i>
    customer loyalty for the 21st century. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 317-329.
    [39]. Mannetti, Lucia, Pierro, Antonio, Kruglanski, Arie, Taris, Toon, & Bezinovic, Petar.
    (2002). A cross‐ cultural study of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: Comparing its
    structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and The Netherlands. British Journal of Social
    Psychology, 41(1), 139-156.
    [40]. Mela, Carl F, Gupta, Sunil, & Lehmann, Donald R. (1997). The long-term impact of
    promotion and advertising on consumer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research,
    248-261.
    [41]. Mittal, Vikas, & Kamakura, Wagner A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and
    36
    repurchase behavior: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics.
    Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 131-142.
    [42]. Murphy, James G, Vuchinich, Rudy E, & Simpson, Cathy A. (2001). Delayed reward
    and cost discounting. Psychological Record, 51(4).
    [43]. Nowlis, Stephen M, Kahn, Barbara E, & Dhar, Ravi. (2002). Coping with ambivalence:
    The effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments.
    Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 319-334.
    [44]. O'Brien, Louise, & Jones, Charles. (1995). Do rewards really create loyalty? Long Range
    Planning, 28(4), 130-130.
    [45]. Papatla, Purushottam, & Krishnamurthi, Lakshman. (1996). Measuring the dynamic
    effects of promotions on brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 20-35.
    [46]. Park, Seung-Bae, Chung, Namho, & Woo, Sang-Cheol. (2013). Do reward programs
    build loyalty to restaurants? The moderating effect of long-term orientation on the timing
    and types of rewards. Managing Service Quality, 23(3), 225-244.
    [47]. Pierro, Antonio, Cicero, Lavinia, Bonaiuto, Marino, van Knippenberg, Daan, &
    Kruglanski, Arie W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness:
    The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4),
    503-516.
    [48]. Presser, Stanley, & Schuman, Howard. (1980). The measurement of a middle position in
    attitude surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(1), 70-85.
    [49]. Roets, Arne, & Van Hiel, Alain. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the
    dimensional structure of the need for closure scale. Personality and Social Psychology
    Bulletin, 33(2), 266-280.
    [50]. Roets, Arne, & Van Hiel, Alain. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item
    version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90-
    94.
    37
    [51]. Rungie, Cam, Uncles, Mark, & Laurent, Gilles. (2013). Integrating consumer
    characteristics into the stochastic modelling of purchase loyalty. European Journal of
    Marketing, 47(10), 1667-1690.
    [52]. Shiloh, Shoshana, Koren, Shelly, & Zakay, Dan. (2001). Individual differences in
    compensatory decision-making style and need for closure as correlates of subjective
    decision complexity and difficulty. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 699-
    710.
    [53]. Sirohi, Niren, McLaughlin, Edward W, & Wittink, Dick R. (1998). A model of consumer
    perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer. Journal of Retailing,
    74(2), 223-245.
    [54]. Tversky, Amos, & Kahneman, Daniel. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of
    decisions. Journal of Business, S251-S278.
    [55]. Uncles, Mark D, Dowling, Grahame R, & Hammond, Kathy. (2003). Customer loyalty
    and customer loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(4), 294-316.
    [56]. Vermeir, Iris. (2003). The influence of need for closure on consumer behaviour. Ghent
    University.
    [57]. Vermeir, Iris, & Van Kenhove, Patrick. (2005). The influence of need for closure and
    perceived time pressure on search effort for price and promotional information in a
    grocery shopping context. Psychology & Marketing, 22(1), 71-95.
    [58]. Vermeir, Iris, Van Kenhove, Patrick, & Hendrickx, Hendrik. (2002). The influence of
    need for closure on consumer’s choice behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology,
    23(6), 703-727.
    [59]. Webster, Donna M, & Kruglanski, Arie W. (1994). Individual differences in need for
    cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049.
    [60]. Yao, Qing, Chen, Rong, & Zhao, Ping. (2013). Precise versus imprecise promotional
    rewards at small probabilities:: Moderating from purchase value and promotion budget.
    38
    European Journal of Marketing, 47(5/6), 1006-1021.
    [61]. Yi, Youjae, & Jeon, Hoseong. (2003). Effects of loyalty programs on value perception,
    program loyalty, and brand loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3),
    229-240.
    [62]. Zhang, Z John, Krishna, Aradhna, & Dhar, Sanjay K. (2000). The optimal choice of
    promotional vehicles: front-loaded or rear-loaded incentives? Management Science,
    46(3), 348-362.

    QR CODE
    :::