| 研究生: |
李承緯 Chen-Wei Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
臺指選擇權賣出跨式策略獲利與風險分析 |
| 指導教授: | 吳庭斌 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2014 |
| 畢業學年度: | 102 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 48 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 選擇權 、跨式交易 、隱含波動度 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | option, straddle strategy, imply volatility |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:11 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文利用探討賣出價平Delta-neutral跨式交易策略在台指選擇權上的報酬與風險,用以探討距離到期日一個月內台指選擇權之隱含波動率是否總是高於實際波動度。本研究主要有以下發現: (一)賣出價平Delta-neutral跨式交易策略有正報酬,顯示隱含波動度高於實際波動度,其中以賣出距離到期日六天的平均報酬最高。(二)賣出跨式交易若經空方避險較多方避險報酬為高,顯示指數短期內大跌易、大漲難的特性(三)賣出當天的平均隱含波動度與報酬成正相關,顯示在隱含波動度較高時更容易高估實際的波動程度(四)賣出價平Delta-neutral跨式交易平均報酬有逐年降低的趨勢。
he purpose of this study is to investigate whether the imply volatility in Taiwan Index Option (TXO) is always greater than the true volatility. So, we construct a strategy by selling the ATM delta-neutral straddle, and then analyze the profits and risk of the strategy to examine the difference between imply volatility and true volatility. Then, we construct other trade strategies on this basis. There are four main findings given as follows: (1) Selling an ATM delta-neutral straddle always has positive profit, showing that its imply volatility always greater than its true volatility. In addition, selling six days due straddle is most profitable. (2) Selling with short hedge is more profitable than with long hedge to the delta-neutral straddle, proofing that index more easily goes down than up. (3) It is more likely to overestimate the true volatility when the implied volatility is at high level, since there is a positive relationship between the implied volatility and the returns on the selling day.(4) The profits of selling the ATM delta-neutral straddle is declining in recent years.
參考文獻
1. Banerjee, P. S., Doran, J. S., & Peterson, D. R. (2007). Implied volatility and future portfolio returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(10), 3183-3199.
2. Berkovich, E., & Shachmurove, Y. (2011). An error of collateral: Why selling SPX put options may not be profitable. The Journal of Derivatives, 20(3), 31-42.
3. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.The journal of political economy, 637-654
4. Copeland, M. M., & Copeland, T. E. (1999). Market timing: Style and size rotation using the VIX. Financial Analysts Journal, 73-81.
5. Cremers, M., & Weinbaum, D. (2010). Deviations from put-call parity and stock return predictability.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45.2:335-367
6. Coval, J. D., & Shumway, T. (2001). Expected option returns. The journal of Finance, 56(3), 983-1009
7. Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., & Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of financial Economics, 7(3): 229-263.
8. Gemmill, G. (1996). Did option traders anticipate the crash? Evidence from volatility smiles in the UK with US comparisons. Journal of Futures Markets16.8: 881-897.
9. Giot, P. (2005).Relationships between implied volatility indexes and stock index returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management 31.3: 92-100.
10. Ni, Sophie X., Jun Pan, and Allen M. Poteshman (2008).Volatility information trading in the option market. The Journal of Finance 63.3: 1059-1091.
11. Pan, J., & Poteshman, A. M. (2003). The information in option volume for stock prices. Unpublished working paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: 4275-4303
12. Whaley, Robert E. (2009). Understanding the VIX. The Journal of Portfolio Management 35.3: 98-105.
13. Xing, Y., Zhang, X. , & Zhao, R.(2010). What does the individual option volatility smirk tell us about future equity returns?, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45.3:641-662
14. 曾緯仁(2007),賣出選擇權跨式策略最適履約價之探討,逢甲大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
15. 陳慶吉(2009), 台指選擇權賣方策略—賣出跨式投資組合績效之實證研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文
16. 周孟宣(2006), 台指選擇權交易策略實證研究—以期初持有至到期結算為例,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文
17. 陳銘鴻(2005), 台指選擇權賣出勒式策略分析,樹德科技大學金融保險研究所碩士論文
18. 楊懷慈(2008),台灣指數選擇權結算前最佳獲利策略之研究, 銘傳大學財務金融學系碩士在職專班碩士論文
19. 陳婉琪(2013),臺指週選擇權引入後對臺指選擇權及臺指期貨之替代互補效果與市場交易品質分析,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
20. 台灣期貨交易所網站