跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾詩綺
Shih-Ci Zeng
論文名稱: 企業社會責任與企業持有現金之價值
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Value of Corporate Cash Holdings
指導教授: 徐政義
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融學系
Department of Finance
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: 企業社會責任現金價值
相關次數: 點閱:7下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本篇研究利用永續發展研究機構(Sustainalytics Responsible Investment Services)於2014年公布美國上市公司之ESG分數作為樣本,探討公司積極投入企業社會責任之程度是否與公司持有之現金價值有關,並利用拔靴法解決樣本數不足之問題。研究結果有以下三點發現,第一,企業投入於企業社會責任積極程度越高(低),其現金價值越低(高);第二,同產業下之企業對於CSR投入之行為積極程度差異甚大,因此CSR的積極投入行為並沒有出現群聚現象;第三,不論企業投入於企業社會責任積極程度高低,發放一單位之普通股現金股利均減少公司價值,但較積極投入於企業社會責任之企業,其減少的幅度呈正相關,意味著CSR的投入能增加投資者之保護。綜合以上,對於公司而言,CSR之投入並不能提升公司持有現金之價值,但是對於投資者仍有正面影響。


    This study discusses the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the value of corporate cash holdings by using the multi-factor model and Bootstrap methodology. The data of ESG score of U.S. listed companies are provided by Sustainalytics Responsible Investment Services at 2014. The results of this study are following. First, the firms with higher ESG score tend to have lower the value of cash holding, and vice versa. Second, there are great variations in the ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) score among firms in the same industry. Third, no matter how higher ESG score, the value of cash holding will decrease at the same levels when the cash dividend increase, but the firm with higher ESG score tend to have lower decreases. That suggest the firms with higher ESG score have higher investor protection. In conclusion, the firms involve in CSR activity could not increase the value of cash holding, but have positive effect on shareholders.

    第一章、 緒論 - 1 - 1.1 研究背景 - 1 - 1.2 研究動機 - 4 - 第二章、 文獻回顧 - 6 - 2.1 CSR與公司價值的研究方法與相關理論 - 6 - 2.2 公司價值與現金價值之關係 - 8 - 2.3 公司持有現金價值之衡量模型 - 10 - 第三章、 研究設計與方法 - 12 - 3.1 假說建立 - 12 - 3.2 模型建立 - 13 - 3.3 資料來源 - 14 - 3.4 樣本篩選 - 16 - 第四章、 實證結果 - 17 - 4.1. 敘述統計 - 17 - 4.2. 迴歸結果 - 21 - 4.3. 拔靴法迴歸結果 - 25 - 第五章、 結論與建議 - 30 - 參考文獻 - 31 - 附錄一. - 34 - 附錄二. - 37 -

    Cheung, A., 2016. Corporate social responsibility and corporate cash holdings.
    Journal of Corporate Financial 37, 412-430.
    Brammer, S., Brooks, C. and Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate social performance
    and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial
    Management 35, 97-116.
    Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 386-405.
    Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A.C., 1987. Corporate stakeholders and corporate
    finance. Financial Management 16, 5-14.
    Deng, X., Kang, J.K. and Low, B.S., 2013. Corporate social responsibility and
    stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of
    Financial Economics 110, 87-109.
    Dittmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J. and Servaes, H., 2013. International corporate
    goverance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and
    Quantitative Analysis 38. 111-133.
    Efron, B., 1979. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of
    Statistics 7, 569-593.
    Fama, E.F. and French, K.R., 1998. Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value.
    Journal of Finance 53, 819-843.
    Feldman, S.J., Soyka, P.A. and Ameer, P.G., 1997. Does improving a firm's
    environmental management system and environmental performance result
    in a higher stock price. The Journal of Investing 6, 87-97.
    Ghoul, S.E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C.Y. and Mishra, D.R., 2011. Does
    corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital. Journal of Banking
    & Finance 35, 2388-2406.
    Goss, A. and Roberts, G.S., 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility
    on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 1794-1810.
    Hamilton, S., Joe, H. and Statman, M., 1993. Doing well while doing good? The
    investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial
    Analysts Journal 49, 62-66.
    Harford, J,. Klasa, S. and Maxwell, W.F., 2014. Refinancing risk and cash
    holdings. The Journal of Finance 69, 975-1012.
    Hong, H. and Kacperczyk, M., 2009. The price of sin: The effects of social
    norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics 93, 15-36.
    Kalcheva, I. and Lins, K.V., 2007. International evidence on cash holdings and
    expected managerial agency problems. The Review of Financial Studies
    20, 1087-1112.
    Kim, M., Surroca, J. and Tribó, J.A., 2014. Impact of ethical behavior on
    syndicated loan rates. Journal of Banking & Finance 38, 122-144.
    Laporta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W., 2000. Investor
    protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58,
    3-27.
    Luo, X. and Bhattachary, C.B., 2009. The debate over doing good: Corporate
    social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk.
    Journal of Marketing 73, 198-213.
    Myers, S.C., Rajan, R.G., 1998. The paradox of liquidity. The Quarterly Journal
    of Economics 113, 733-771.
    Nelling, E. and Webb, E., 2009. Corporate social responsibility and financial
    performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance
    and Accounting 32, 197-209.
    Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. and Williamson, R., 2006. Does the contribution of
    corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on
    governance? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Finance 61, 2725-
    2751.
    Pinkowitz, L. and Williamson, R., 2007. What is the market value of a dollar of
    corporate cash. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 19, 74-81.
    Surroca, J., Tribo´, J.A. and Waddock, S., 2010. Corporate responibility and
    finacial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic
    Management Journal 31, 463-490.
    Wolf, J., 2014. The relationship between sustainable supply chain management,
    stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of
    Business Ethics 119, 317-328.
    周心怡,2004,拔靴法(bootstrap)之探討及其應用,碩士論文,國立中央大學統
    計研究所。
    陳旭昇,2013,時間序列分析: 總體經濟與財務金融之應用,二版,東華書局,
    臺北市,民國一O二年。

    QR CODE
    :::