傳統的教學都是在教室內由教師單方面的傳授知識，但知識是學習者與環境互動的產物，學生應該要在真實的環境中學習，習得的知識才有意義。然而，在一般的課堂上很難創造一個真實的知識運用環境，有許多限制。擴增實境技術的進步，利用擴增實境有可能在教室內使用混合實境建構一個模擬真實的情境，呈現豐富的場景。若學生要能進入混合實境場景跟環境做互動，則需要建立的環境非常大、技術比較複雜、成本也較高，對於推廣到一般學校裡面或家庭中有實質上的困難，因此，必須找一個扮演學生代理人的角色，代替學生進入混合實境的場景中與場景做互動。玩具型和教育用機器人逐漸成熟，價格也慢慢降到可負擔範圍，因此本論文使用機器人做為學生的代理人，進入混合實境的場景來做互動。
本論文設計了一個機器人的控制程式，可以在混合實境中和環境及學習者做互動，機器人會讀入場景地圖及本身的座標，因此知道自己在場景中的位置，可自行做事件觸發的判斷，並可以做邊界及例外的判斷與處理。利用機器人內建的sensor來設計與學習者互動的方式，並在電腦上擴增機器人語音的辨識與輸出能力。可以讓學習者用各種不同的方式和機器人互動，讓學生感覺在真實的環境中學習。
本系統的實驗對象為36位大崙國中二年級的學生，分別使用加入機器人的混合實境學習系統及控制虛擬機器人圖示來代替實體機器人的學習系統。實驗結果顯示，機器人的加入讓混合實境學習系統更有真實感與刺激感。和機器人互動也讓學習者覺得很有趣，透過和機器人互動的過程，提昇了混合實境學習系統的臨場感，可以讓學生融入在設計好的情境內，也會更投入在學習活動當中，進而提昇其學習的動機。

The traditional instruction is carried out by the teacher in the class with single side. However, knowledge is the production of the interaction between learners and surroundings. It’s meaningful for students to learn in the physical surroundings. Actually, it’s hard to build a knowledge-manipulating surrounding which contains many limitations. With the advance of augmented reality techniques, building a mixed reality of rich scenes with augmented reality has come true in the class. To interact with the surroundings in the mixed reality is expensive and hard for students; it’s hard to promote the ideas to schools or family. Therefore, we had to find a student deputy as a representative to immerse in the mixed reality and to interact with the surroundings. Toy robots and robots for education become popular and the prices are acceptable within the budget, so we used robots as the student deputy to enter the mixed reality to interact with the surroundings.
In this research, we design a program, which can control robot in a mixed reality surroundings. Robot can interact with surroundings and learners. The program will read the map and robot’s coordinate in the scene. So robot knows where it is. Robot can detect the occurrence of events and deal with the boundary and exceptions by itself. We designed the interaction modes with learners by using the sensors which the robot built-in. We also expanded the robot’s ability in voice recognition and voice output. Learners can use multiple way to interact with the robot. Students will feel like learning in the physical surroundings.
In this research, the subjects are 36 second grade junior high school students. They used the mixed reality learning system with robot and the learning system which use robot icon substitute the physical robot. The experiment result shows that mixed reality learning system with robot, students feel more authentic and exciting. Students feel more interesting, engaging, and increasing the presence and learning motivation though interacting with robot.

[1] 石兆芬，「作為教室教學伙伴之可程式化機器人」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2007年。
[2] 呂英撰，「利用可設計組裝的表演說故事機器人來達到從設計中進行學習」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2007年。
[3] 吳俊誠，「設計可程式化說故事機器人作為學生課後練習工具」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2008年。
[4] 林宏展，「以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2006年。
[5] 徐昇暉，「實體與虛擬動物同伴對學生學習專注影響之初探」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2007年。
[6] 游鎮嘉，「應用史賓機器人於英語教室作為教師之教學伙伴」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2006年。
[7] 魏榜賢，「設計機器人輔助使用者寫日記系統建立使用者與機器人的長期關係」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2008
[8] Biocca, F. (1997). The Cyborg''s Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments. In Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication, 3 (2), 12-26.
[9] Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. (2001). Criteria and Scope conditions for a Theory and Measure of Social Presence. Presence, 4thAnnual International Workshop.
[10] Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Martin, O., Nandi, A., & Marichal, X. (2004). Compelling Experiences in Mixed Reality Interactive Storytelling. International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology,32-40.
[11] David B., Thomas C., & Gary M., (2006) .SMALLab: a mediated platform for education. International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques No. 33.
[12] Han, J., Kim, D., Lee,K., Park,S., & Shin K.(2005). The Educational Use of Home Robots for Children. IEEE International Conference on Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication, 378- 383.
[13] Brown J. S., Collins A., & Duguid P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, Vol. 18, No. 1, 32-42.
[14] Joshua, W., David, J. F., Dylan, A. S., & Maja, A. M. (2007). Embodiment and human robot interaction: A task-based perspective.Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
[15] Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial. Journal of Human Computer Interaction, Vol. 19, No. 1-2, 61-84.
[16] Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. (2005). Communication Robots for Elementary Schools. Symposium Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, 54-63.
[17] Nishiwaki K., Kobayashi K., Uchiyama S., Yamamoto H., Kagami S. (2008). Mixed Reality Environment for Autonomous Robot Development. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2211-2212.
[18] Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 27–50.
[19] Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2004). The multiple source effect and synthesized speech: Doubly disembodied language as a conceptual framework. Human Communication Research, 182–207.
[20] Lombard, M. & Ditton, T., (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2).
[21] Lu, Y. T., Chang, C. W., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Using a Programmable Storytelling Robot to Motivate Learning Second Language. Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 841-844.
[22] Marti, P., Giusti, L., Pollini, A., & Rullo, A. (2005). Experiencing the flow: design issues in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies, Vol. 121, 69-74.
[23] Minsky, M. (1980, June). Telepresence. Omni, 45-51.
[24] Powers, D. M., Leibbrandt, R., Pfitzner, D., Luerssen, M., Lewis, T., Abrahamyan, A., & Stevens, K. (2008). Language teaching in a mixed reality games environment. Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related To Assistive Environments, 1-7.
[25] Scott A. G, Mark B, XiaoQi, C. & J. Geoffrey Chase, (2008). Human-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems Vol. 5, No. 1, 1-18.
[26] Shih, C. F., Chang, C. W., & Chen G., D. ( 2007). Robot as a Storytelling Partner in the English Classroom - Preliminary Discussion. Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 678-682.
[27] Toshitaka I., Tuan N. N. , &Masanori S. (2008). A storytelling support system using robots and handheld projectors. Interaction Design and Children Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children, 113-116.
[28] Wainer J., Feil-Seifer D., Shell D., & Matari′c M. (2007). Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 872-877
[29] Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual environments: A Presence Questionnaire, Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
[30] Wu, C. C., Chang C. W., Liu, B. J., & Chen, G. D. (2008). Improving Vocabulary Acquisition By Designing A Storytelling Robot. Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 498-500.
[31] Xie, L., Antle, A. N., & Motamedi, N., (2008). Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, 191–198.
[32] You, Z. J., Shen, C. Y., Chang, C. W., Liu, B. J., & Chen, G. D. (2006). A Robot as a Teaching Assistant in an English Class. Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 87-91.