| 研究生: |
史安潔 Angelita Staine |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
貝里斯消費者購置電動汽車之經濟評估及消費者需求之研究 Economic Evaluation and Demands for Consumers in Belize to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles |
| 指導教授: |
廖萬里
Wan-Li Liao |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 國際永續發展碩士在職專班 International Environment Sustainable Development Program |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 119 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電池式電動汽車 、內燃機式汽車 、成本效益分析 、層級分析法 、陳述式偏好調查 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Battery Electric Vehicle, Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle, Cost Benefit Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Survey, Stated Preference Survey |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:19 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
貝里斯現今試圖推動一項增加電動汽車用戶的交通政策以邁向低碳經濟社會。本研究藉由成本效益分析方法(CBA)分析比較電池式電動汽車(以下簡稱電動汽車)與內燃機式汽車的購置成本效益,及應用層級分析法(AHP)於購置電動汽車的六項標準,包括購買成本、期望汽車耐用年限、充電站普遍性、每次充電可駕里程、充電時間及二氧化碳減排等之偏好優先順序;並採用陳述式偏好調查法(SPS)調查貝里斯消費者於本項調查所提供之五種電動汽車型式的選購基本需求與條件。
以出廠新車五年內的成本分析結果顯示,電動汽車之成本效益高於內燃機汽車。本研究調查發現,有甚多貝里斯消費者如果換車會考慮購置電動汽車,但是他們甚為關切電動汽車的購價高低。這需要當局實施一項降低電動汽車與內燃機汽車的售價差距之經濟誘因激勵政策,包括電動車購買補貼與退稅。研究調查顯示消費者較能接受之電動車售價在美金$36,000至 $43,185之間,而每次充滿電期望至少能駕駛里程達249英哩,此外,貝里斯消費者較偏愛的電動車車型是休旅車與轎車。
本研究結果指出,電動汽車工業之發展於減少貝里斯二氧化碳足跡的國家發展方向上,包括減少進口能源的依賴度,具有關鍵性角色,而本研究可作為貝里斯有關當局推動電動汽車政策之參考。
Belize is currently attempting to transition to a low carbon economy by implementing an electric transportation strategy that is to increase the users of electric vehicles. This study sought to analyze the cost effectiveness of a battery electric vehicles (BEV) against an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICE vehicle) as well as evaluate the demands of users for purchasing battery electric vehicles in Belize. This was done for the consumers in Belize by using the analytic technique and surveying tools of cost benefit analysis (CBA), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and stated preference survey (SPS).
CBA is used to measure the costs and benefits of the decision in purchasing BEV to replace ICE vehicles, and AHP technique is used for the selection of BEV and prioritization of six criteria including purchase cost, life expectancy, access to charging stations, travel range, charging time, and carbon dioxide reduction. The use of stated preference survey (SPS) is to survey how customers might behave in five models of BEV selection by showing their preference. Results indicate that the BEV is more cost effective over its 5-year lifetime than ICE vehicles in Belize. According to the survey from this study, many Belizean consumers would consider having an electric vehicle as their next car purchase, however, they are much concerned about the purchase cost of BEV. The necessary incentive policies must be implemented to decrease the initial cost of the electric vehicle, thus increasing its adoption in Belize. One the primary measures is purchase subsidies including tax rebates of vehicle purchase to reduce the price gap with conventional vehicles. To increase marketability of electric vehicles entering Belize’s automobile market, it is suggested that the purchase price is within the range of $36,000- $43,185, the travel distance at least 249 miles and the most preference BEVs are SUVs and sedans.
For moving towards a low carbon country, reduction of carbon dioxide CO2 emissions from transportation is a necessary policy in Belize. This study indicates that Belize’s electricity generation mix boosts the BEV’s effectiveness in reducing annual CO2 emissions. This finding demonstrates that BEV can play a critical role in reducing Belize’s carbon footprint, specifically within the transport industry, thus can be of great influence in Belize realizing one of its INDC (intended nationally determined contributions) goals, which is lowering energy concentrations within transport by endorsing conversion to sustainable transportation. The results of economic analysis and the findings of Belizean consumers’ demands from this study could provide a valuable information for the authorities of Belize in promoting electric vehicle strategies.
[1]. Worldometer. Belize Population (LIVE), 2021
[2] Ministry of Economic Development. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from urban transportation in Belize City with co-benefits for improved urban air quality and energy security, 2019.
[3] UN Environment, Global Environment Facility, European Union, FIA, PCFV, GFEI. Establishment of a baseline for the fuel economy of light duty vehicles. Cleaner and More Efficient Fuels and Vehicles in Belize, 2016.
[4] World Health Organization. Belize General Health Risks: Air Pollution, 2020.
[5] Tillett, A. et al. National Energy Policy Framework, 2011.
[6] Government of Belize. Belize (INDC), 2015.
[7] Lewis, M. et al. Climate Change, Fossil Fuels, and Human Well Being. Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2018.
[8] Ritchie, H. et al. Belize: CO2 Country Profile. Our World in Data, 2020.
[9] Nagurney, A. Sustainable Transportation Networks. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000.
[10] Chapman, L. “Transport and Climate Change: A Review”. Journal of Transport Geography, 2007. pp. 354–367.
[11] Rodrigue, J.-P. 4.1 – Transportation and Energy. The Geography of Transport Systems, 2020.
[12] Eurostat. Climate Change - Driving Forces Statistics Explained, 2009.
[13] U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2013, 2013.
[14] United Nations. Sustainable Transport. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform.
[15] Chang, C. et al. “Energy Conservation and Sustainable Economic Growth: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy Policy”. 2011. pp. 4215–4221.
[16] Balza, L. et al. Energy Needs in Latin America and the Caribbean to 2040. Inter-American Development Bank, 2018.
[17] Viscidi, L., O’Connor, R. The Energy of Transportation: A Focus on Latin American Urban Transportation. Center for Transatlantic Relations SAIS, Washington DC, 2017.
[18] Tissot, R. Latin America’s Energy Future. Inter-American Dialogue. Working Paper, 2012.
[19] UN Environment. Movilidad Eléctrica: Oportunidades para Latinoamérica. United Nations Environment Program, Santiago de Chile, 2016.
[20] Rehermann, F., Pablo-Romero, M. “Economic Growth and Transport Energy Consumption in the Latin American and Caribbean Countries”. Energy Policy.2018. pp 518–527.
[21] Bräuninger, M. et al. Achieving sustainability in urban transport in developing and transition countries, 2012.
[22] Kong, F., Liu, X. (2017). “Sustainable Transportation with Electric Vehicles”. Foundations and Trends® in Electric Energy Systems.2017. pp. 1–132.
[23] https://www.business-standard.com/about/what-is-electric-vehicle
[24] Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Electric Vehicle Basics. Energy.gov.
[25] Hearst Autos Research. Electric Cars: Pros and Cons. Car and Driver, 2020.
[26] Samsara. How Are Electric Vehicles Better for the Environment, 2021.
[27] Gomis, G. et al. Electric Mobility - Developments in Latin America and the Caribbean and Opportunities for Regional Collaboration, 2018.
[28] Yang, Z. et al. Principles for Effective Electric Vehicle Incentive Design, 2016.
[29] Pojani, D., Stead, D. “Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities. Sustainability”, Vol 7(6), 2015. pp. 7784–7805.
[30] Quiros-Tortos, J. et al. “Electric Vehicles in Latin America: Slowly but Surely Toward a Clean Transport”. IEEE Electrification Magazine, Vol 7(2). 2019.pp. 22–32.
[31] Bernard Wagner. Belize City Council Rolling out Electronic Buses. Love FM, 2021.
[32] Marine, K. BEL's contribution to Introducing BEV's in Belize. personal, 2021.
[33] Hayes, A. How Cost-Benefit Analysis Process Is Performed. Investopedia, 2021.
[34] Weller, J. Cost Benefit Analysis: An Expert Guide. Smart sheet, 2016.
[35] Merritt, C. How Is Net Present Value Related to Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2017.
[36] Nyingtob, N. A Cost Benefit Analysis of introducing Electric Vehicles in Bhutan. MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 2015.
[37] Mariano, V. At what mileage do most cars start having issues. Quora, 2019.
[38] How Long Do Electric Car Batteries Last? TrueCar Blog, 2021.
[39] Hanley, N., Spash, C. Cost–benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, England, 1993.
[40] Boardman, A. et al. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concept and Practice. Prentice Hall, Second Edition, New Jersey, 2001.
[41] Piao, J. et al. (2014) “A Cost Benefit Analysis of Electric Vehicles - a UK Case Study”. Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference, France. 14 – 27.2014. pp. 1-9.
[42] Forman, Ernest H.; Saul I. Gass (July 2001). "The Analytical Hierarchy Process—An Exposition". Operations Research. Vol 49 (4). 2001. pp. 469–487.
[43] Petrik, O. et al. “Stated Preference Surveys in Transport Demand Modeling: Disengagement of Respondents”. Transportation Letters, 8(1). 2016. pp. 13 25.
[44] Hearst Autos Research. What is Average Mileage Per Year. Car-Driver, 2020.
[45] https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/Belize/electricity_prices/
[46] https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/Belize/gasoline_prices/
[47] Harto, C. Electric Vehicle Ownership Costs: Chapter 2—Maintenance, 2020.
[48] Belize Electricity. Worldometer, 2016.
[49] Earth Notes. A Note On Variations in UK/GB Grid Electricity CO2 Intensity with Time, 2012.
[50] Maibach, M. et al. Handbook On Estimation of External Costs in The Transport Sector. Produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All External Cost of Transport (IMPACT), 2008.
[51] Eyre, N. et al.” Fuel and Location Effects on the Damage Costs of Transport Emissions”. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 31(1). 1997. pp. 5-24.
[52] Adhikari, M. et al. “Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use”. Sustainability, 12(12). 2020. pp. 4850.
[53] Hagman, J. et. al. “Total cost of ownership and its potential implications for battery electric vehicle diffusion. Research in Transportation Business & Management”. Vol. 18, 2016. pp. 11–17. essay, Elsevier.
[54] Element Energy. Electric Cars: Calculating the Total Cost of Ownership for Consumers, 2021.
[55] Chiu, Y.-C., & Tzeng, G.-H. “The market acceptance of electric motorcycles in Taiwan experience through a stated preference analysis”. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol 4(2). 1999. pp. 127–146.
[56] Broadbent, G. et al. Electric Vehicle Adoption: An Analysis of Best Practice and Pitfalls for Policy Making from Experiences of Europe and The US, 2018.