跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 雅仁
Yacouba Siko
論文名稱: 永續都市規劃指標系統之發展
Development of an Indicator System for Sustainable Urban Planning
指導教授: 黃榮堯
Rong-Yau Huang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 國際永續發展碩士在職專班
International Environment Sustainable Development Program
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 112
中文關鍵詞: 永續發展指標次指標系統都市計畫永續都市
外文關鍵詞: urban planning, sustainable development, indicators and sub indicator systems, sustainable urban
相關次數: 點閱:9下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近二十年來,永續發展的觀念已成為許多學科的核心重點,尤其在都市計劃方面。可持續的都市化發展(sustainable urbanization)是達到永續性(sustainability)目標的一種過程。唯有在環境、社會、經濟因素互相關聯且互補之多面向考量的前提下,再加上都市計畫者及都市發展相關人員的共同參與,才能達到永續性的目標。
    本文的研究目的在發展出一套永續都市發展的指標系統,文中透過文獻回顧檢視數個永續觀念,並使用專家問卷的研究方法,針對環境、社會及經濟等三個面向,發展出永續都市發展指標及次指標之矩陣基礎(matrix)。
    最後,本論文提供一套永續都市規劃指標及次指標之系統,包括方法指引及每項指標之評估方式。本文亦提供幾項建議給都市計畫者,當碰到永續性規劃問題時,該用什麼「方法」 (how)及「內容」(what)來達成目標。


    The concept of sustainable development has become a central focus for many disciplines and particularly for urban planning in the last two decades. Sustainable urbanization is a process towards a goal. Achieving the goal of sustainability engages the responsibility of both urban planners and those who are involved in the development of cities, and supposes the existence of a multidimensional system within which environmental, social and economic factors are interrelated and complementary.
    The objective of this study is to develop an indicator system for sustainable urban planning. The study reviews several concepts and uses a methodological approach to develop a matrix for sustainable urban planning indicators and sub indicators within the three areas of concern. As a result, the thesis provides a system for sustainable urban planning indicators and sub indicators, including guidance and measurement techniques for each indicator. It also proposes pathways for urban planners for “how” and “what” urban planners could do to address the problem of planning sustainability.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………i ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………….….ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………….iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………………………. iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………...vii LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………….....viii LIST OF ANNEXES…………………………………………………………………......ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................... 1 1.1 The problem statement and Research questions………………………………………1 1.2 Objectives and Scope of the study………………………………………………….....4 a. Objective of the study………………………………………………………………4 b. Scope of the study…………………………………………………………………4 1.3 Methodology ……………………………………………………………………….....5 a. Literature review…………………………………………………………………..5 b. The conception of the matrix through data collection and the questionnaire……..6 1.4 The overall structure of the thesis……………………………......................................6 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...……………………………………………7 2.1 Urbanization and urban planning theory………………………………………………7 2.2 Sustainable development concepts and theory……………………………………......7 2.3 Sustainable urban development and Sustainable development ………………………8 2.4 Basic aspects and concepts of planning urban sustainability…………………………9 2.5 Existing sustainable urban indicators systems……………………………………….11 CHAPTER 3: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDICATOR SYSTEM ………………...13 3.1. Step 1- Conceptual consolidation: Defining the characteristics of urban planning Sustainability ………………………………………………………………14 3.2. Step 2- Analytical structuring: Our definition of urban sustainability ……………..17 3.3. Step 3- Indicators identification …………………………………………………….18 a. Environmental category ………………………………………………………19 b. Social category………………………………………………………………...20 c. Economic category ……………………………………………………………21 3.4. Step 4- Identification of rating framework …………………………………………26 a. Expert’ list selection process …………………………………………………..26 b- The questionnaire ……………………………………………………………..26 c- Indicators selection techniques ………………………………………………..27 3.5. Step 5- Analysis of the back questionnaire …………………………………………27 3.6. Step 6- The final indicators checklist ……………………………………………….28 CHAPTER 4: A CASE STUDY- THE CITY OF BOBO-DIOULASSO …………...34 4.1 Backgrounds analysis of the current urban planning practices ……………………...34 a. The planning tools …………………………………………………………….35 b. An example of planning tool: The 1990 master plan of Bobo-Dioulasso ……36 4.2. Operations for urbanism of details ………………………………………………….39 a. Definitions …………………………………………………………………….39 b. The current infrastructures equipments and services planning processes ……39 4.3. Implementing sustainable urban planning indicators into the case study urban Planning process…………………………………………………………………......41 a. Comparison of sustainable urban planning and case study indicators…….......41 b. Assessment of the case study: The Radar diagram for the City of Bobo-Dioulasso……….........................................................................47 c. An initiative for implementing the indicators…………………………………50 4.4. Findings.…………………………………………………………………………….57 a- Strong sustainability and weak sustainability………………………………….57 b. A set of indicators for urban planning sustainability in developed countries and For urban planning sustainability in developing countries…………………….59 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS ……………...62 5.1 Conclusions ……………………………………………….62 5.2 Suggestions……………………………………………………….69 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...73

    1- Akimasa, F. Backjin, L. Junyi, Z. (2005). “Evaluating sustainability of urban development in developing countries incorporating dynamic cause-effect relationship over the time”. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 4349-4364
    2- Alex de Sherbinin. (2003) “The Role of Sustainability Indicators as a Tool for Assessing Territorial Environmental Competitiveness” Presented at the International Forum for Rural Development 4-6 November, 16 p
    3- Alshuwaikhat H. M. (2005) Developing Spatial Urban Planning Guidance for Achieving
    Sustainable Urban Development GBER Vol. 5 No. 3 pp 51 – 66
    4- André O. (2005). “Sustainability of urban renewal through the eyes of inhabitants: The influence of a changing population in residents’ opinion of urban renewal in Dutch posts war, neighborhoods”, 10 p
    5- Arish, D. (2005). “Master Thesis: How Should Urban Planning Engage the Issue of Sustainable Development? The Case of Hammarby Sjostad, Stockholm”, 93 p
    6- Auckland sustainable cities programme (2005). “Towards Sustainable Urban Form:
    Connecting research and practice II”, 15 April, Summary 39 p
    7- Boyle, C. and Gerry, T. K. C. (2005). “Sustainability Principles and Practice for Engineers” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. Fall, pp32-39
    8- Brockerhoff, M. (2000). “Urban Growth in Developing Countries: A Review of Projections and Predictions”, pp757-778
    9- Browne, D. : Theoretical Appraisal of Sustainability Metrics and Empirical Application to an Irish City-region to Assess Current and Future Sustainability, 26 p
    10- Bugliarello, G. (2006). “Urban Sustainability, Challenges, Paradigms and Policies” Foreign Secretary, National Academy of Engineering Korean Academy of Science and Technology Distinguished Lecture November 3, 8 p
    11- Campbell, T. (2006): “Urban Age Institute Learning Cities: Acquiring Knowledge, Intelligence, and Identity in Complex Systems”, 131 p
    12- Cifuentes, E., Rodriguez, S. (2005). “Urban Sprawl, Water Insecurity, and Enteric Diseases in Children from Mexico City”, pp 70-75
    13- Crossroads Resource Center (1999). “Neighborhood Sustainability Indicators Guidebook. How to Create Neighborhood Sustainability Indicators in Your Neighborhood”, February, 71 p
    14- D'' Ieteren, E., Morelle, S. H. W. (2002). “Arterial Streets: Towards Sustainability Approach of the Sustainability Concept”. Version 1.1 Internal Technical Notes May, 38 P
    15- De Vlieger, I., Cornelis, E., Pelkmans, L., Panis, L. ,Verbeiren, S., Proost, S., Knockaert, J. (2003). “Sustainability Assessment of technologies and modes in the transport sector in Belgium” Intermediary Scientific Report January, 39 p
    16- Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), (2005). “Environmental Impact Assessment; Guidelines for assessment of urban development” January, 22 p
    17- Environmental Assessment Report, India (2005). “Kerala Sustainable Urban Development Project”, December, 8 p
    18- European Commission (2006). “Europe’s sustainable development strategy”. EUR 22003 European R&D in support of the EU Sustainable development strategy, 24 p.
    19- European sustainable development and health series, (1999). “Towards a new planning process: a guide to reorienting urban planning towards local agenda 21”, 54 p
    20- European Environmental Agency (2006). “Urban sprawl in Europe: The ignored challenge” EEA Report No 10, 60 p
    21- Fehr, M., Sousa, K.A., Pereira, A.F.N, Pelizer, L.C (2003). “Proposal of indicators to assess urban sustainability in Brazil”, pp 355-366
    22- Finco, A., Nijkamp, P. (2001). “Pathways to Urban Sustainability”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 3, pp 289–302
    23- Finco, A., Nijkamp, P. (1999). “Series Research Memoranda Planning for sustainable spatial development: Principles and application”, 33 p
    24- Giuseppe, M. (2001). “Indicators and Evaluation Tools for the Assessment of Urban Sustainability”, 16p
    25- Giuseppe, M. (2005): Measuring sustainability: a multi-criteria framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability 7 pp 117–134
    26- Günter M., Andrea, F., (2005). “GTZ-Services for Sustainable Urban Development Strengthening local actors and local governance to make cities worth living in” November, 36 P
    27- Halla, R. S., Christopher A. K., Barry J. A. (2005). “Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems1”, pp 70-85
    28- Haringey Unitary Development Plan First Deposit Consultation (2003). “Sustainability Statement – Including Checklist”. September, 10 p
    29- Hastings Local Development Framework (2005). “Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment”. Draft Scoping Report for Consultation September, 74p
    30- Ian C. (1999). “Which focus for building assessment methods -environmental performance or sustainability?”, pp 321-331
    31- Imagine Calgary, (2006). “Long Range Urban Sustainability Plan for Calgary”. June, 107 p
    32- ISIS Waterside Regeneration, (2006). “Sustainability charter”, January, 19 p
    33- Julian, A., Tom E. (2003). “Toward Just Sustainability in Urban Communities: Building Equity Rights with Sustainable Solutions”. ANNALS, AAPSS, 590, November, pp 35-53
    34- Keiner, M. (2005). Sustainability oriented urban development: A General Introduction with Case Studies from Gaborone, Johannesburg and Santiago de Chile, 47p
    35- Kerstin, A., (2003). “SEA AND SIA – Two participative assessment tools for sustainability” pp. 175-181
    36- Klaus, S. Michael, W., (2003). “Modeling Urban Sustainability”. International Journal of Urban Sciences 7(1), pp 47-64.
    37- Kristina, A., (2005). “Urban sustainability indicator development criteria”. Summary of doctoral dissertation in Environmental Science, branch Environmental Management,
    Riga, 36 p
    38- Kristina, A., Andis, Z., (2002). “Evaluation of urban sustainability in specific Latvia”,
    pp 300-314
    39- Lesley, H., Jim, B., Stanley M.G., (2004). “An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework” Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp 725–755
    40- Lesley, H., Jim, B., Stanley M.G.M., (2004). “An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 2, Empirical Evaluation and Case-study Analysis”, Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp 757–772
    41- Lesley, H., Jim, B., Stanley M.G., (2002). “An aggregated weighting system for evaluating sustainable urban regeneration”. Journal of Property Research, 19(4) pp 353–373
    42- Lundin M., (1999). “Assessment of the Environmental Sustainability of Urban Water Systems”. Department of Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers University of Technology. Göteborg, Sweden, 55p
    43- Marjo, K., José I. B., Carlo, L., Valentina, S., Elisabetta, G. ( 2005). “Towards urban un-sustainability in Europe? An indicator-based analysis”. 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association. Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society, Amsterdam, 23-27 August. 20p
    44- Milena, L., Giancarlo, D., (2006). “Sustainability and urban planning processes: An integrated tool for sustainable urban management”. 46th Congress European Regional Science Association Enlargement, Southern Europe and the Mediterranean, 14p
    45- Ministries of Environment in the five Nordic countries, (2004). “Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden: Spatial planning as an instrument for promoting sustainable development in the Nordic countries”. Action program for 2001–2004 32 p
    46- Ministry of Habitat and Urbanism (1990). “Master plan of Bobo-Dioulasso”, 545 p
    47- Mirilia, B. David, U. Giuseppe, C. Tanika, K.(2007). “Inhabitants’ and Experts’ Assessments of Environmental Quality for Urban Sustainability”. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 59--78
    48- Naess, P., (2001). “Urban Planning and Sustainable Development”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp 504-524
    49- National Science Foundation, (2000). “Workshop on Urban Sustainability Towards a comprehensive geographical perspective on urban sustainability”, 29 p
    50- Ole, D., Niels, B.G., Jacek, Z. (1998). “Spatial Planning for Sustainable Development in the Baltic Sea Region”, A VASAB 2010 contribution to Baltic 21, 68 p
    51- Peter, N., Jeffrey, K. (2006). “Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence” Volume 2, Issue 1 Article 3, pp 35-52
    52- Phil, H., Wellington P.H. (2000). “Sustainability indicators for New Zealand cities and communities”. New Zealand Planning Institute Conference, 17-20 May, Christchurch 39 p
    53- Research and Analysis Division Infrastructure Canada (2006). “The Path towards Sustainability an Evaluation of the “Sustainability-ness” of Selected Municipal Plans in Canada”, December, 64 p
    54- Santa Monica, A sustainable community (2006). “Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan”, 30p
    55- Sato J. (2004). “Comparison between multiple-choice and analytic hierarchy process: measuring human perception”, pp 77–86
    56- Sebastiaan de Wilde, (2004) “Sustainability and the use of urban space Environmental assessment of intensive and multiple use of space” Holland Rail consult Andy van den Dobbelsteen Published in: Nova Terra, nr. 2, June, pp. 17-21
    57- Spiekermann K., Wegener, M. (2003). “Modeling Urban Sustainability”. International Journal of Urban Sciences 7(1), pp 47-64.
    58- Steve, C., Ian, C. (1998). “The implications of urban sustainability”. Building Research and Information 26(1), pp17–28
    59- Sustainable Urban Services (2003). “Water and Waste Management in 15 Pacific Rim Agglomerations”. First Synthesis June, 28 p
    60- Sustainable Seattle, (1998). “Indicators of Sustainable Community”. A status report on long-term cultural, economic, and environmental health for Seattle/King County, 73 p
    61- The World Urban Forum (2006). “Turning ideas into Action”, Vancouver Working Group Discussion Paper 70 p
    62- Touber J (2004): Master thesis: “The Scale of Planning Practices and Development Policies in the Developing World: the Case of Sana’a”, Yemen, 96 p
    63- Voula M., Jørn P. (1998). “Urban Sustainability Indicators European foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions”, 64 p
    64- Wing-Shing Tang (2000). “Chinese Urban Planning at Fifty: An Assessment of the Planning Theory Literature”. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 14, No.3, pp 347-366
    65- World urban forum Dialogue on urban sustainability (2004). “Environment, economy, society: commitment to a culture of partnerships for sustainable urbanization”, July, 11p
    66- Yosef R. J., (2006). “Sustainable Urban Forms, their Typologies, Models, and Concepts, Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning”, Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: pp 38-52.
    67- http://www.sdrc.auckland.ac.nz/cp/tfoo002-2Kcp.pdf.
    68- http://www.ec.gc.ca/soer-ree/English/Scip
    69- http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/urbanenvironment
    70- http://www.mcgill.ca/
    71- http://www.clear.london.ca/default.html
    72- http://www.leics.gov.uk/index.htm
    73- http://www.answers.com/
    74- http://www.bookrags.com/Urban_planning
    75- http://www.gc.ca/

    QR CODE
    :::