本研究的研究目的為：(1) 瞭解專家對「統計『相關』概念模擬學習軟體」雛型(劉子鍵，民94)的評估意見；(2) 瞭解學生對「統計『相關』概念模擬學習軟體」雛型的評估意見；(3) 評估學生上機操作「統計『相關』概念模擬學習軟體」的歷程；(4) 具體提出「統計『相關』概念模擬學習軟體」未來改進方向。
根據研究結果，本研究的主要結論如下：
1. 本雛形軟體表現符合學習軟體的設計水準
2. 本雛形軟體的多重表徵間動態連結環境有助於學生學習抽象統計概念
3. 本雛形軟體以模擬為基礎的概念改變模式，可適性化達到釐清學生迷思概念的目的
4. 對未來發展完整「統計『相關』概念模擬學習軟體」的修改建議包括：
(1)修正概念改變模式；(2)異例引起矛盾的設計重點需擺在診斷題目上；(3)修正內容架構以適合完整的「統計『相關』概念模擬學習軟體」；(4)內容的文字陳述宜修剪且注重圖文併陳，而回饋的重要訊息需適時強調；(5)介面需兼顧協調與變化性，不可忽略頁面間的瀏覽操作方式以及讓學生瞭解所處軟體架構的部分；(6)在介面上要增加同時比較的視窗。

參考文獻
中文部分
左台益 & 蔡志仁 (民90)。動態視窗之橢圓教學實驗。 師大學報：科學教育類，
4(1，2)， 21-42。
李世忠(民88)。教學科技--評鑑與應用。台北：五南。
林清山(民81)。 心理與教育統計學。台北：東華。
岳修平譯 (民87)。 E. D. Gagne, C. W. & F. R. Yekovich 原著。 教學心理學。台
北： 遠流。
邱美虹 (民89)。 概念改變研究的省思與啟示. 科學教育學刊，8(1)，1-34。
陳啟明 (民80)。 發展紙筆測驗以探究高一學生對直流電路的迷思概念。彰化師
範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文 (未出版)。
陳淑筠 (民91)。 國內學生自然科學迷思概念研究之後設研究。 國立台東師範
學院教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
郭重吉 (民81)。 從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展，
20(5)， 548-570。
張川木 (民84)。 促進概念改變教學法(I)。 科學教育月刊，185，21-27。
張春興 (民85)。 教育心理學。 台北： 東華書局。
葉偉文譯(民90)。薩爾斯伯格(Salsburg, D.)原著。統計改變了世界(The Lady
Tasting Tea)。 台北市：天下遠見。
鄭惟厚譯 (民87)。墨爾(D. S. Moore)原著。統計，讓數字說話。台北市：天下遠
見。
劉子鍵 (民94)。電腦模擬輔助學習與同儕互動學習對大學生之統計迷思概念的
影響。 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(報告編號：NSC-
93- 2520-S-008-004)，未出版。
劉俊庚 (民91)。 迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析－以概念構圖和後設
分析模式探討其意涵與影響。 國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論
文 (未出版)。
謝哲仁 (民91)。 基本統計學之動態電腦教學設計。美和技術學院學報，20，142。
鍾聖校 (民83)。 對科學教育錯誤概念研究之省思。教育研究資訊，2(3)，89-110。
饒達欽 (民79)。 電腦與資訊教育。台北：松崗書局。
102
英文部分
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and
development (Third ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Blejec, A. (2002). Teaching statistics by using simulations on the internet. Paper
presented at the ICOTS6, Cape Town, South America.
Burrill, G. (2002). Simulation as a tool to develop statistical understanding. Paper
presented at the ICOTS 6, Cape Town, South America.
Clement, J., Rea-Ramirez, & Mary, A. (1998). In search of disonance: The evolution
of dissonance in conceptual change theory. ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 417 985.
Coxfard, A. F. (1995). The case connections. Connecting Mathematics across the
curriculum. In P. A. House & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 3-12). Yearbook.
Cumming, G. (2002). Live figures: interactive diagrams for statistical understanding.
Paper presented at the ICOTS6, Cape Town, South America.
Cumming, G., & Thomason, N. (1995). Designing software for cognitive change:
StatPlay and understanding statistics. In J. D. Tinsley & T. J. v. Weerts (Eds.),
World Conference on Computers in Education VI WCCE 95, Liberating the
Learner (pp. 753-765). London: Chapman & Hall.
Cumming, G., & Thomason, N. (1998). Statplay:multimedia for statistical
understanding. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on
Teaching Statistics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore:
International Statistical Institute.
delMas, R., Gardfield, J., & Chance, B. (1999). Exploring the role of computer
simulations in developing understanding of sampling distributions. Paper
presented at the the AERA Annual Meeting, Montreal.
Driver, R. (1983). Theories-in action:some theoretical and empirical issues in the
study of students'' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in science
education, 10, 30-60.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to carriculum
development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
Eaton, J. F. (1983). When Students Don''t Know They Don''t Know. Science and
Children, 20(7), 6-9.
Finzer, W. F., Erickson, T. E., & Press, K. C. (2002). DataSpace - A computer
learning environment for data analysis and statistics based on dynamic
dragging visualization simulation and networded collaboration. Paper
presented at the ICOTS 6, Cape Town, South America.
Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in
probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal for Research in
103
Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44-63.
Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63 ,
25-34.
Groeneboom, P., Jong, P. D., Tischenko, D. B., & Zomeren, B. C. v. (1996). Computer
-assisted statistics education at delft university. Journal of Computational &
Graphical Statistics, 5(4), 386-399.
H. Palmer, D. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and
conceptual change. Science Education, 87(5), 663-684.
Hart, K. S., A. (1987). Forging the Link Between Practical and Formal Mathematics.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the
International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education, Budapest.
Hodgson, T., & Burke, M. (2000). On Simulation and the Teaching of Statistics.
Teaching Statistics, 22(3), 91-96.
Janvier, C. (1987). Representation and understanding: The notion of function as an
example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and
Learning of Mathematics (pp. 67-71). Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Kaput, J. J. (1987). Representation systems and mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.),
Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (pp.
19-26.). Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Lecoutre, M. p. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in "purely radom"
situations. Educational studies in mathematics, 23, 557-568.
Lesh, R., Post, T. & Behr M. (1987). Representations and Translations among
Representations in Mathematics Learning and Problem Solving. In C. Janvier
(Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of
Mathematics (pp. 33-40). Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Lipson, K. (1996). What do students gain from simulation exercises: An evaluation of
activities designed to develop an understanding of the sampling distribution of
a proportion. Paper presented at the Research on the Role of Technology in
Teaching and Learning Statistics, University of Granada, Spain.
Mervyn, M., Meeker, W., Cook, D., & Sung, T. S. (1994). Using graphics and
simulation to teach statistical concepts. Paper presented at the Paper presented
at the Annual meeting of the American Statistician Association.
Mills, J. D. (2002). Using computer simulation methods to teach statistics: A Review
of the Literature. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(1).
Morris, E. J. (2001). The design and evaluation of Link: A computer-based learning
system for correlation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1),
39-52.
Morris, E. J., Joiner, R., & Scanlon, E. (2002). The contribution of computer-based
104
activities to understanding statistics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
18(2), 114-124.
Morris, E. J., & Voi, M. L. (1998). Sorting the wheat from the chaff: Evaluating a
large corpus of computer-based statistics teaching resources. In P.-M. L, S. K.
L, W. K. T & W. W (Eds.), Statistical Education-Expanding the Network.
proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (Vol.
2). Singapore: International Statistical Institute.
Novak, J. D. (1988). Learning science and science of learning. Studies in Science
Education, 15, 77-101.
Pollatsek, A., Lima, S., & Well, A. D. (1981). Concept or computation: Students''
understanding of the mean. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 191-204.
Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching.Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Ross, L., & Anderson, C. (1982). Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the
origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments. In D. Kahneman, P.
Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and
Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Velleman, P. F., & Moore, D. S. (1996). Multimedia for teaching statistics: Promises
and pitfalls. The American Statistician, 50(3), 217-225.
Webster, E. (1992). Evaluation of computer software for teaching statistics. Journal of
Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 11(3/4), 377-391.
West, C., & Snellen, J. (1991). Interactive demonstrations for statistics education on
the world wide web. Journal of Statistics Education, 6(3).
Yu, C. H., & Behrens, J. T. (1994). Identification of misconceptions in learning
statistical power with dynamic graphics as a remedial tool. Paper presented at
the Proceedings of 1994 American Statistical Association Convention,
Alexandria, VA: ASA.
Yu, C. H., & Behrens, J. T. (1995, April 19). Identification of misconceptions in the
central limit theorem and related concepts and evaluation of computer media
as a remedial tool. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, San Francisco,CA.