跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王欣瑜
Hsin-Yu, Wang
論文名稱: 外國廠商成本差異下的最適關稅政策
指導教授: 邱俊榮
Jiunn-Rong Chiou
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 50
中文關鍵詞: 成本差異最適關稅政策進口模型
外文關鍵詞: import competition, cost difference, optimal tariff
相關次數: 點閱:14下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文研究本國廠商與外國廠商成本差異與市場結構內生的情況下,本國政府如何制定最適單一進口關稅政策,以提高本國的社會福利。本文發現當外國高成本廠商的成本不會太高時,本國政府為了要留住外國廠商願意課徵一個較低的關稅,但若外國高成本廠商的成本高於某一成程度,本國政府會課徵一個較高的關稅,逼迫外國高成本廠商退出本國市場,對本國社會福利較好。此外,我們進一步探討本國有多家廠商的情況,本文發現當本國廠商家數越多時,本國政府會課徵較低的進口關稅,但在Cournot數量競爭下,外國高成本廠商的生存空間也會縮小,所以會使外國高成本廠商更容易退出本國市場。


    This thesis analyzes how the home government determines the single optimal import tariff when the two foreign exporting firms’ costs are different. It is assumed that the home firm(s) and two foreign firms engage in Cournot competition in domestic market. We find that home government should impose a lower tariff in order to retain foreign firm when the cost of high-cost foreign firm is not too high. However, when the cost of the foreign high-cost firm is high enough, the home government should impose a higher tariff to force high-cost foreign firm to withdraw from the home market. In addition, we further find that when there are more home firms in market, the home government should lower the import tariffs. Therefore, it is more likely that the foreign high-cost firm can survive when there exist more local competitors.

    第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究方法 2 1.3 研究流程與架構 3 第2章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 貿易關稅政策的相關文獻 4 2.2 市場結構的相關文獻 5 第3章 進口競爭與最適關稅政策 7 第4章 本國多廠商與最適關稅政策 25 第5章 結論 39 參考文獻 41

    Ara, T. and A. Ghosh (2017), “Tariffs, Vertical Oligopoly and Market Structure,” Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), 17-E-025.
    Bhattacharjea, A. (1995), “Strategic Tariffs and Endogenous Market Structures: Trade and Industrial Policies under Imperfect Competition,” Journal of Development Economics, 47(2), 287-312.
    Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1981), “Tariffs and the Extraction of Foreign Monopoly Rents under Potential Entry,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 14, 371-389.
    Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1984), “Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competition,” in H. Kierzkowski ed., Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Etro, F. (2011), “Endogenous Market Structures and Strategic Trade Policy,” International Economic Review, 52(1), 63-84.
    Etro, F. (2012), “Endogenous Market Structures and Welfare,” University of Venice at Ca’Foscari Working Paper No, 12.
    Etro, F. (2014), “Optimal Trade Policy under Endogenous Foreign Entry,” Economic Record, 90, 282-300.
    Falvey, R., D. Greenaway, and Z. Yu (2004), “Intra-industry Trade between Asymmetric Countries with Heterogeneous Firms,” GEP Research Paper Series, 05.
    Helpman, E., M. J. Melitz, and S. R. Yeaple (2004), “Export versus FDI,” The American Economic Review, 94, 300-316.
    Hwang, H. and C. C. Mai (1991), “Optimum Discriminatory Tariffs under Olipolistic Competition,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 24, 693-702.
    LeClair, M. and D. Franceschi (2006), “Externalities in International Trade: The Case for Differential Tariffs,” Ecological Economics, 58, 462- 472.
    McCalman, P., F. Stähler, and G. Willmann (2019), “Contingent Trade Policy and Economic Efficiency,” Review of World Economics, 155(2), 227-255.
    Markusen, J. and F. Stähler (2011), “Endogenous Market Structure and Foreign Market Entry,” Review of World Economics, 147(2), 195-215.
    Rodrik, D. (1986), “Tariffs, Subsidies, and Welfare with Endogenous Policy,” Journal of International Economics, 21, 285-296.
    Soderbery, A. (2018), “Trade Elasticities, Heterogeneity, and Optimal Tariffs,” Journal of International Economics, 114, 44-62.
    Tanaka, Y. (1993), “Reciprocal Tariff Imposition and Welfare in Free Entry Oligopoly,” Japan and the World Economy, 5, 73-90.
    Yang, Y.-C. and P.-Y. Nie (2020), “Optimal Trade Policies under Product Differentiations,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(1), 241- 254.

    QR CODE
    :::