現行勞務採購所使用契約中，多數係以過程為導向之契約型態，亦即藉由過程的履約管理，使其達到業主所預期的成果。目前國外所使用之成效式服務契約(Performance-Based Service Contract, PBSC)有別於傳統技術與過程導向之契約型態，改以產出與成效目標為衡量基準的新型態契約。經本研究分析，國內現行勞務採購契約存有下述兩項問題：(1)現行勞務契約所規範之行為，多數對於專案成效帶來效益值得商榷、(2)無法激勵承攬廠商採取更好的履約方式，提升專案整體成效。本研究藉由文獻回顧、標竿學習及專家訪談等方法，對於勞務採購應用成效式契約進行初步研究。本研究具體成果包括：國內成效式勞務採購契約範本(技術服務契約範本)、工作成效說明範本、成效式契約執行流程、訂約注意事項，及採用成效式勞務採購契約可能存在之問題。期待本研究之成果可做為國內於勞務採購導入成效式契約之基礎，使勞務採購能因為成效式契約的採用而獲得服務成效之提升。

When performing service procurements, most of owners employ process-oriented contracts which imply achieving anticipated outcomes through managing whole project execution processes. Beside Taiwan, many conturies adopted an innovative contract type, the Performance-Based Service Contract (PBSC), which focuses on project outomes and performances rather than processes in traditional contracts. This study found two major problems in service procurements in Taiwan, including (1) most of contract requirements might have no direct link to project performances and (2) no effective approach to incentive contractors to improve project performances. This study employed literature review, benchmarking and expert interviews to investigate the possibility of applying performance-based contracts to service procurements. Essential outcomes of this study include a standard form of PBSC, performance work statements for PBSC, clear execution processes and key issues for implementing PBSC, and possible obstacles of using PBSC. It is anticipated that the outcpmes of this study can be a basis of implementing PBSC in Taiwan which improves the performances of service procurements.

[1] 行政院公共工程委員會，政府採購法彙編，臺北，2011。
[2] Hughes, W. and Kabiri, S., Performance-based contracting in the construction sector. Technical Report (A report for Transport for London), University of Reading, Reading, UK, 2013.
[3] Best Practices for Performance-Based Contracting ,Office of Federal Procurement Policy,1998.
[4] A Report on the Performance-Based Service Contracting Pilot Project, Office of Federal Procurement Policy,1998
[5] Pakkala, P., Innovative Project Delivery Methods for Infrastructure—An International Perspective, Finnish Road Enterprise, Helsinki, Finland, 2002.
[6] 行政院公共工程委員會，公共工程技術服務契約範本，臺北，2014。
[7] 楊智斌、余文德、邱垂德、鄭紹材，「道路工程成效規範契約示範案例」，行政院公共工程委員會研究報告，2010。
[8] 財團法人中國生產力中心全球資訊網，標竿學習，2014。http://cpc.tw/about/management_article/105
[9] The World Bank, Sample Bidding Documents and Sample Specifications for Procurement of Works and Services under Output- and Performance-based Road Contracts, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., October 2006.
[10] 楊智斌、余文德、邱垂德、鄭紹材，「強化公路鋪面品質整合型計畫-道路養護成效合約規範建立」，交通部運輸研究所研究報告，2008。
[11] Piñero, J. C., “A framework for monitoring performance-based road maintenance,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2003.
[12] The World Bank Group, Introduction to Performance-based Contracting, http://www-esd.worldbank.org/pbc_resource_guide/trn.htm, 2006.
[13] Zietlow, G., “Cutting Costs and Improving Quality through Performance-Based Road Management and Maintenance Contracts - The Latin American and OECD Experiences,” Senior Road Executives Programme Course Materials—Restructuring Road Management, 29 April - 5 May，University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, 2007.
[14] Frost, M., “Imperatives in Future Road System Management Improved Road Maintenance Productivity - The Australian Case,” Proceedings of the 14th IRF World Congress, Paris, 2001.
[15] Training Courses for Performance-Based Management and Maintenance of Roads, World Bank, 2005.
[16] British Columbia Ministry of Transportation, Request for Qualifications and Maintenance Standards,
http://www.worldbank.org/transport/roads/resource-guide/Docs-latest%20editio n/bidding%20docs/canada/Canada_BC_MOT_RFQ.pdf.
[17] Performance-Based Management Special Interest Group, http://www.orau.gov/pbm/contracts/99-ASTM-FIRE%20PROT-EM.pdf
[18] Stankevich, N., Navaid Qureshi N. and Queiroz C., “Performance-based Contracting for Preservation and Improvement of Road Assets,” Transport Note No. TN-27, World Bank, Sep. 2005.
[19] 彭凱烽，成效式契約於公有建築物能源設備維護管理之應用，2013。
[20] 劉昀青，道路維護成效式合約中估驗計價條款之研擬，2009。
[21] 林志棟，臺北市市區道路養護導入成效合約規範之說明，2013。
[22] 彭凱烽，成效式契約應用於公有建築物能源設備維護管理之案例分析，2013。
[23] 邱垂德，導入成效式契約以提昇鋪面養護效率，2010。
[24] 邱垂德，成效指標於國內道路之實證初探，2009。
[25] 楊智斌，國內道路養護導入成效式合約分析，2009。
[26] Spendolini, M.J., “The Benchmarking Book,” NY：AMACOM, 1992。
[27] 張庭蓁，以標竿學習法探討校園閒置空間活化再利用之研究，碩士論文，中華大學營建管理學系，2013。
[28] 陳佐銘，企業實行標竿管理以提升營運成效之研究－以長谷建設公司為例，碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理研究所，2000。
[29] 林庚龍，以標竿學習推動組織變革之個案研究，碩士論文，國立中正大學企業管理研究所，2010。
[30] 周文智，我國私立科技大學工業設計學門自我評鑑標準建構之研究－標竿學習取向，博士論文，國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系研究所，2008。
[31] Camp,R.C.,“Benchmarking:The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance,”Milwaukee ,Wisconsin：American Society for Quality Control（ASQC）, 1989.
[32] Fisher,J.G.,“How to Improve Performance Through Benchmarking,” London：Clays Ltd, 1996.
[33] Mittelstaedt,R.E,“Benchmarking:How to Learn from Best-In-Clas Practices,”National Productivity Review ,pp.301-315, 1992.
[34] 閻自安、郭昭佑，標竿學習對教育評鑑的啟示，教育研究月刊，112期，第78-90頁，2003。
[35] 蔣庭琳，標竿學習之研究－以中央健保局及國泰人壽為例，碩士論文，國立東華大學公共行政研究所，2011。
[36] 徐連城，我國反貪腐策略改進之研究－以香港與新加坡為標竿學習對象，碩士論文，私立逢甲大學公共政策研究所，2005。
[37] 交通部公路總局，處本部103年度交控室24小時輪班監控業務外包勞務採購契約，2014。
[38] 潘慧華，台鐵工程勞務採購成效衡量指標之研究，2006。
[39] 臺北市政府工務局新建工程處，102、103年度道路維護、緊急搶修、道路新(拓)建及騎樓整平等工程委託監造技術服務A項（內湖區、南港區）契約，2013。
[40] 潘世偉，美國勞資爭議處理制度中預防調解概念與措施，2006.10。
[41] 行政院公共工程委員會，機關委託技術服務廠商評選及計費辦法，臺北，2013。
[42] General Services Administration,Example Performance-Based Statement of Work (SOW),2011.