| 研究生: |
林宣宇 Hsuan-Yu Lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: | Common Ownership and Online Platforms Competition with In-store Referral |
| 指導教授: |
蔡明宏
Min-Hung Tsay 蔡栢昇 Pak-Sing Choi |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所 Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 52 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 共同所有權 、店內推薦 、線上平台 、品質 、市場分割 、價格競爭 、機構投資 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | common ownership, in-store referral, online platforms, quality, market segmentation, price competition, institutional investment |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:17 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文構建了一個簡化模型,考慮在共同所有權下兩個競爭零售商之間的相互推薦關係。藉由檢驗較低品質改變的效果和機構投資人持有這兩個零售商股份比例的影響,主要的發現為共同所有權增強了正面影響並減輕了負面影響。特別是共同所有權提高了品質的門檻,為零售商提供了更多改進的空間。然而,如果較低品質過高,這種效果會消失。另一方面,共同所有權為零售商創造誘因去最大化其股東利益。最後,共同所有權也影響福利,研究顯示只有單位成本的增加,但低於一個特定門檻,才能改善整體社會福利。
This paper constructs a stylized model that considers the relationship of mutual referral between two competing retailers under common ownership. The main findings indicate that common ownership enhances the positive impacts and mitigates the negative impacts on both prices and profits by examining the effects of changes in lower quality and the ratio of these two retailers’ shares held by the institutional investors. In particular, common ownership increases the threshold of quality, providing retailers with more room to improve. However, this effect disappears if the lower quality is too high. On the other hand, common ownership may create an incentive for retailers to maximize their shareholders’ interests. Finally, common ownership also impacts welfare, which shows that only an increase in unit costs, but lower than a certain threshold, can improve overall social welfare.
Antón, M., Ederer, F., Giné, M., & Schmalz, M. C. (2023). Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 131(5), 1294–1355.
Azar, J., Raina, S., & Schmalz, M. C. (2022). Ultimate ownership and bank competition. Financial Management, 51(1), 227–269.
Azar, J., Schmalz, M. C., & Tecu, I. (2018). Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. Journal of Finance, 73(4), 1513–1565.
Baye, M. R., & Morgan, J. (2001). Information gatekeepers on the internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. American Economic Review, 91(3), 454–474.
Cai, G. G., & Chen, Y.-J. (2011). In-Store Referrals on the Internet. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 563–578.
Gramlich, J., & Grundl, S. (2017). Testing for Competitive Effects of Common Ownership.(Working Paper)
Kennedy, P., O’Brien, D. P., & Song, K., M. andWaehrer. (2017). The competitive effects of common ownership: Economic foundations and empirical evidence. (Working Paper)
Kung, L.-C., Sun, P.-Y., Huang, C.-Y., & Lee, W.-C. (2017). Why promoting for competitors? online in-store referral for products with heterogeneous quality. (Working Paper)
O'Brien, D. P., & Salop, S. C. (2000). Competitive effects of partial ownership: Financial interest and corporate control. Antitrust Law Journal, 67, 559–614.
Park, A. H., & Seo, K. (2019). Common Ownership and Product Market Competition: Evidence from the U.S. Airline Industry. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 48(5), 617–640.
Ryan, J. K., Sun, D., & Zhao, X. (2012). Competition and Coordination in Online Marketplaces. Production and Operations Management, 21(6), 997–1014.
Schmalz, M. C. (2018). Common-ownership concentration and corporate conduct. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10, 413–448.
Torshizi, M., & Clapp, J. (2021). Price Effects of Common Ownership in the Seed Sector. The Antitrust Bulletin, 66(1), 39–67.
Wu, H., Cai, G., Chen, J., & Sheu, C. (2015). Online Manufacturer Referral to Heterogeneous Retailers. Production and Operations Management, 24(11), 1768–1782.