| 研究生: |
謝明珊 Ming-shan Hsieh |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
製造業企業社會責任揭露意願探討 A Study of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Willingness in the Manufacturing Industry |
| 指導教授: |
于樹偉
Shuh -Woei Yu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 環境工程研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Environmental Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2014 |
| 畢業學年度: | 102 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 90 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 永續發展 、企業社會責任 、CSR報告書 、GRI G4 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Sustainable development, Corporate social responsibility, CSR reporting, GRI G4 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著各界對企業在經濟、環境與社會等領域的責任要求,落實企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR)已成為全球企業的共同活動。為能展現相關作為的具體成果與管理績效,並與利害相關者進行有效溝通,企業開始發行企業社會責任報告書。
本研究以製造業為研究對象,利用問卷調查方式,共發放540份問卷,有效回收問卷數為252份,探討發行企業社會責任報告書之動機及困難度,另採用廣泛使用之永續性報告綱領GRI G4版作為發行企業社會責任報告書揭露意願之探討。
本研究分析結果顯示,我國製造業有善盡企業社會責任認知,發行CSR報告書之企業僅少數大企業,仍處於被動狀況,若無客戶要求或利害相關者要求,是不會主動發行CSR報告書,並發現未來計畫發行CSR報告書之企業亦有增加趨勢,代表企業發行報告書之意願逐漸提升。在研究構面分析中,企業在動機構面認同程度無顯著差異,僅發行報告書情形有顯著差異,可反映我國企業缺乏推動CSR報告書動力。股票市場發行情況及發行報告書情形在困難度構面有顯著差異。報告書引用GRI G4整體揭露意願度、內容中一般項目,環境面項目、社會面項目皆無顯著差異,企業成立時間及企業類型在經濟面項目有顯著差異,表示企業在於經濟面向資訊揭露有多方考量。
Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, is a management philosophy, which encourages organizations, not just business entities, to encompass social justice and environmental protection while pursuing long-term business objectives. In addition, CSR reporting helps organizations to set the strategies and to design the action plans to achieve the ultimate goal of sustainable development. CSR report converts the abstract concept of sustainability into tangible financial, social and environmental performances. Another significant impact of CSR reporting is to enhance stakeholder engagement.
This study aims to evaluate the willingness of Taiwanese companies in the manufacturing industry to disclose the impact of their operations or business practices on social justice, environmental protection. A questionnaire, designed based on the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Guidelines G4, is used to collect information from the respondents. The questionnaire primarily focuses on the reporting aspects of motivation, difficulty, disclosing willingness, and overall considerations. The questionnaire was sent to 540 Taiwanese and multinational companies with 252 respondents.
The program Statistical Analysis for Social Science SPSS 20.0 is used to measure reliability and validity of the returned questionnaires. The survey results reflect certain fundamental problems in CSR reporting in Taiwan. Firstly, most of the respondents have a high degree of reservations concerning the issuance of CSR report. The only exception is the companies with their stocks traded in the Taiwan Stock Exchange since they are regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission. However, a number of respondents did state their intention to issue CSR report in the near future. Another observation derived from the survey is the tendency for small and medium-sized enterprises to ignore the sustainability issue because of economic hardship. They are more concerned about short-term financial goals. Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that some type of government intervention might be needed to raise the awareness and willingness for CSR reporting.
1.CorporateRegister.com,”CRRA Global Winners & Reporting Trends 2013”, 2013.
2.經濟部工業局,台灣CSR報告書發行現況與優質案例介紹,台北市,2013年。.
3.財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心,上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則http://www.selaw.com.tw/scripts/NewsDetail.asp?no=G0100284.
4.KPMG, “The KPMG Survey of CR Reporting 2013”, 2013.
5.中華經濟研究院,臺灣重要經濟變動指標,http://www.cier.edu.tw/mp.asp?mp=1.
6.行政院主計處,中華民國行業標準分類,台北市,2011年。
7.Sheldon, O., The Philosophy of Management, London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd, 1924.
8.Berle, A.A., & Means, G.C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, N.Y., 1932.
9.Bowen H.R, Social responsibilities of the businessman, Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, NY, 1953.
10.Sethi, S. P., Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytic, 1975.
11.WBCSD, “Cross-cutting Theme”, World Business Commission for Sustainable Development, 2003.
12.EC, “Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility-Green Paper”, Employment and Social Affair, European Union, 2001.
13.EC, “Corporate Social Responsibility-A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development”, Employment and Social Affair, European Union, 2002.
14.EC, “A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility”, European Commission, 2011.
15.CED, “Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations”, New York: Committee for Economic Development, 1971.
16.Carroll, A.B., “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505, 1979.
17.Elkington, J., Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford, 1997.
18.鄭孟承,外銷導向與內銷導向中小企業致力於企業社會責任之意願研究,逢甲大學,碩士論文,2010。
19.Garriga, E., & Mele, D., “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory”, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 1(2), 51-71, 2004.
20.Zadek, S., Third Generation Corporate Citizenship, Public Policy and Business in Society. The Foreign Policy Centre, 2001.
21.Galaskiewicz, J., “Professional networks & the institutionalization of a single mind set. America Sociological Review”, 50(5), 639-658, 1985.
22.臺灣企業社會責任網,國際間企業社會責任(CSR)揭露情況及動機探討,CSR專欄,2010,取自http://csr.moea.gov.tw/。
23.曾柔鶯,現代管理學,新北市,高立出版社,2003。
24.林孟彥,管理學,台北市,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,2006。
25. Brophy, M., & Starkey, R., “Environmental reporting”, In R. Welford(Ed),
Corporate Environmental Management - systems and strategies, Ch. 10, 177-198, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, 1996.
26.Claude, L., & Darroch, R., “Why disclose more? “ Ivey Business Journal, 64 (2), 62-65, 1999.
27.中華民國企業永續發展協會,企業社會責任報導,企業永續發展簡訊,第77期,2003,取自http://www.bcsd.org.tw/2010/index06.htm。
28.經濟部工業局,台灣CSR報告書發行現況與優質案例介紹,台北市,2011年。
29.IRRC, Survey of Environmental Reporting, Investor Responsibility Research Center, http://www.irrc.porg and www.enviroreporting.com.
30.UNEP, “Industry andenvironment”, Company environmental reporting - A Measure of the Progress of Business&Industry Towards Sustainable Development Technical Report, No.24, 31. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris, 1994.
31. 申永順,國際間環境報告書之發展現況,環境管理報導,第12期,1999。
32.UNCSD RIO+20,”The Future We Want”, United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development , 2012.
33.GRI、UNEP&KPMG, “Carrots and Sticks:Sustainability reporting policies worldwide –today’s best practice, tomorrow’s trends”, 2013.
34.申永順,國內外企業永續報告書之發展與推動現況,2008年。
35.經濟部工業局,台灣CSR報告書發行現況與優質案例介紹,台北市,2013年。
36.Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Menichini, T., Rosati, F., & Sanfelice, G., “Turning Corporate Social Responsibility-driven Opportunities in Competitive Advantages: a Two-dimensional Model”, Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 20, 1(1), 50-58. , 2013.
37.GRIG4 Part1 Implementation Manual, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf.
38.GRI G4 Part2 Implementation Manual, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4.
39.McIntosh, M., Living Corporate Citizenship-Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business, London: Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2003.
40.全球盟約Global Compact,http://www.unglobalcompact.org/.
41.國際勞工組織ILO,http://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm.
42.全球蘇利文原則Global Sulliven Principles ,http://globalsullivanprinciples.org/principles.htm.
43.跨國企業指導綱領OECD Guidelines for Multinational ,Enterpriseshttp://www.oecd.org/home/.
44.社會責任標準 Social Accountability 8000 (SA 8000),
http://www.sa-intl.org/.
45.當責性標準AccountAbility 1000s (AA 1000s),http://www.accountability.org/standards/.
46.社會責任指引ISO 26000,http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm.
47.經濟部,產業創新條例,http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/home/Home.aspx.
48.經濟部投資業務處,台灣企業社會責任網站http://csr.moea.gov.tw/main.aspx.
49.經濟部工業局,產業永續發展整合資訊網企業社會責任專區http://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Application.
50.金融監督管理委員會,證期局全球資訊網公司治理專區,http://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=655&parentpath=0,648.
51.臺灣證券交易所股份有限公司,企業社會責任專區,http://www.twse.com.tw/CSR/page_1.php.
52.行政院勞工委員會,勞退基金引領企業善盡社會責任,
http://www.cla.gov.tw/cgi-bin/Message/MM_msg_control?mode=viewnews&ts=4e841360:76a2.
53.勞工退休基金監理會,社會責任投資(SRI)專區,
http://www.lpsc.gov.tw/cgi-bin/SM_theme?page=4ae69833.
54.行政院環境保護署,中華民國企業環保獎,
http://ivy3.epa.gov.tw/AEEPA/Page/News/News.aspx.
55.行政院國家永續發展委員會,永續發展政策綱領,
http://nsdn.epa.gov.tw/CH/DEVELOPMENT/DEVELOPMENT.HTM.
56.CSRone 企業社會責任部落格,SRI社會責任型投資就是未來的投資趨勢,
http://blog.csrone.com.tw/?p=1007
57.張春興、楊國樞、文崇一,社會及行為科學研究法(上冊) ,東華書局,台北市,1978。
58.吳統雄,「態度與行為研究的信度與效度」,理論、應用、反省,民意學術專刊,1985。
59.Chien, C. F. & Liu, Q. W. “Developing data mining methods for wafer bin map clustering and the empirical study in a semiconductor manufacturing fab”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management in New Century, 581-587, 2001.
60.吳明隆、涂金堂,SPSS與統計應用分析SPSS& The application and analysis of statistics,五南出版社,台北市, 1999。