身為人力資源發展(Human Resource Development )的執行者，就是要協助組織培育人才、協助組織成員發揮潛能並且讓他們能夠融入組織，成為內部人(insider)。其中，師徒制(mentoring)就是最重要的發展工具之一，主要是透過資深成員提供經驗、協助給資淺成員，使其能在職涯發展中得以成長。近年來，有不少企業開始推動「mentor」（導師）制度，透過資深人員協助後輩新人，將公司的文化、願景、專業知識傳遞給資淺人員，使其能早日融入組織之中、降低其焦慮的心情以及勝任工作。
本研究目的在於以徒弟的觀點，探討師徒關係對師徒功能的影響並以組織社會化作為師徒關係的結果變項。本研究以中央大學管理學院研究所畢業生及在職專班為對象，進行問卷調查，有效問卷共162份，研究結果如下：
1. 相較於正式師徒關係，徒弟在非正式師徒關係類型中，認知獲得較多的整體師徒功能以及職涯功能。
2. 相較於非直屬關係類型，徒弟在直屬關係類型中，認知獲得較多的職涯功能。
3. 不論是正式或是直屬師徒關係哪類型，徒弟均認知獲得較多的組織目標與價值社會化。顯示師徒制度的發展，能夠讓徒弟掌握目標、認同組織的價值觀。
4. 在多元迴歸分析結果中，職涯功能與人的社會化具有顯著的相關；在角色楷模面，角色楷模與政治的社會化有顯著的相關。

As human resource development implementers, they are expected to assist organization to cultivate employees, develop individual potential and make them become insiders. Mentoring is one of the most important developmental tools. It means that senior members provide experiences, assistance for the junior members and make them grow in the career development process. In recent years, many companies launch mentorship. Through the senior members assisting the junior ones, they deliver cultures, values, and knowledge to them and make themselves to adapt organization, decrease anxiety, and perform well in the job.
According to protégés’ view, this search is to discuss mentorship on mentoring functions and organizational socialization. The data used in this study were collected from the Management College of National Central University. They are alumni of the graduate students and executive master of business administration (EMBA) students. Surveys were mailed to 500 individuals. A total of valid surveys were 162.
The results:
1. Informal protégés were significantly higher than formal protégés on whole mentoring function and career-related function.
2. Supervisor protégés were significantly higher than non-supervisor protégés on career-related function.
3. Formal protégés were significantly higher than informal protégés on organizational goals and values; supervisor protégés were also significantly higher than non-supervisor protégés on organizational goals and values.
4. In the regression analysis, career-related function is significant related to the “people dimension”; while “role model” is significant related to politics.

參考文獻
一、 中文部份
1. 李碧芬譯，1998，Wichman F. & Sjodin T.原著，成功有師為伴，台北：麥格羅希爾台灣分公司。
2. 李全福，2000，師父的個人特質、組織情境因素對師徒功能影響之研究，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。
3. 呂曉青，2005，師徒關係認知與生涯發展之相關研究—以國際觀光旅管廚師為例，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文。
4. 林佳暖，2005，師徒關係與組織承諾，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 周希敏譯，1995，Zey M.G.原著，職場導師，台北：方智書局。
6. 高美琴，2002，師徒間認知差異對知識移轉績效之影響：調節模式的驗證，國立東華企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 黃智，2000，工作經驗、資訊尋找行為與工作滿足之關係—以管理碩士為例，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
8. 曾慧珍，2003，師徒關係及員工社會化程度對個人組織契合度之影響卅以航空運輸業為例，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。
9. 董玉娟，2000，工作—家庭衝突、組織社會化對離開現職傾向影響之研究：以台商派駐大陸已婚員工為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
10. 劉曉寧，2001，師徒個人特質、性別角色與師徒關係類型、性別組合對師徒功能影響之研究，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文部分
1. Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., Russell, J. E. A., & Dobbins G. H., 1997. “A field study of factors related to supervisors’ willingness to mentor others.”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 50, pp. 1-22.
2. Allen, T. D., McManus, S. E., & Russell J. E. A., 1999. “Newcomer socialization and stress: Formal peer relationships as a source of support.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 54, pp.453-470.
3. Armstrong, S. J., Allison, C. W. & Hayes, J., 2002. “Formal mentoring systems: An examination of the effects of mentor/protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process.” The Journal of Management Studies. Oxford, Vol. 39, pp. 1111-1137.
4. Belle, R. R., John L. C., & Janice S. M., 2000. “Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 1177-1194.
5. Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D., 1994. “Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, pp. 730-743.
6. Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M., & Gardner, P. D., 1992. “Formal and Informal Mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts.” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 45, pp. 619-636.
7. Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A.,1990. “A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, pp.539-546.
8. Fagenson, E. A., 1989. “The mentor advantage: perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non-protégés.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, pp. 309-320.
9. Fagenson-Eland, E. A., Marks, M. A., & Amendola, K. L., 1997. “Perceptions of mentoring relationships.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 51, pp. 29-42.
10. Feldman, D. C., 1976 “A contingency theory of socialization.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 433-452.
11. Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, 2000. Organizations Behavior Structure Processes. MC Graw Hill.
12. Jones G. R., 2001. Organizational Theory. Prentice Hall.
13. Kram, K. E., 1983. “Phases of the mentor relationship.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 608-625.
14. Kram, K. E., 1985. “Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.” Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
15. Louis M.R., 1980. “Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.25, pp. 226-251.
16. Louis, M.R., Posner, B. Z., & Powell, G. N., 1983. “The availability and helpfulness socialization practices.” Personnel Psychology, Vol.36, pp. 857-866.
17. McManus, S. E. & Russell, J. E. A., 1997. “New directions for mentoring research: An examination of related constructs.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 51, pp. 145-161.
18. Noe, R. A., 1988. “An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships.” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 41, pp. 457-479.
19. Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski, S. W. J., 1993. “The role of mentoring in the information gathering processes of newcomers during early organizational socialization.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 42, pp. 170-183.
20. Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. B., 1990. “Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 37, pp. 321-339.
21. Riley, S., & Wrench, D., 1985. “Mentoring among women lawyers.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, pp.374-386.
22. Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Steele, K., 1995. “Design and implementation issues in socializing (and resocializing) employees.” Human resource planning, Vol.17, pp.17-25.
23. Reichers, A. E., 1987. “An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates.” Academy of Management Review, Vol.12, pp278-287
24. Schein, E. H., 1968. “Organizational socialization and the profession of management.” Industrial Management Review, Vol.9, pp1-16.
25. Scandura, T. A., 1992. “Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13, pp. 169-174.
26. Scandura, T. A.,& Ragins, B. R., 1993. “The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 43, pp. 251-265.
27. Wickman, F., & Sjodin, T., 1996. Mentoring: The most obvious yet overlooked key to achieving more in life than you ever dreamed possible. McGraw-Hill.
28. Wilson, J. A. & Elman, N. S., 1990. “Organizational benefits of mentoring.” Academy of Management Executive, Vol.4, pp. 88-94.
29. Willbur, J., 1987. “Does mentoring breed success?” Training & Development Journal, Vol. 41, p38-41.
30. Zey, M.G., 1991.The mentor connection. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwi