菸害一直都是造成國人健康的一大病痛，而政府的宣導、法規的界定加上健康捐的手法推行，對於菸害的狀況並沒有太大的改善，在政府推行公共場所禁煙的行政方式之後，抽煙的人也僅是轉換抽煙的地點，並沒有有效的抑制抽煙的人數。
現今大多戒菸廣告都以負面的陳述方式為主，本研究將探討在不同的情境下，正、負面的訊息陳述何者較為有效。本研究以訊息陳述方式(正面/負面)、圖片訴求呈現(群/己)、廣告訴求對象(自己/他人)、脈絡呈現方式(圖重文輕/文重圖輕)、以及樣本與模特兒的性別差異(相同/相異)作為自變數。在樣本利益偏好(紓解壓力/社交)的調節效果下，不同變數組合的情境對戒菸廣告所帶來的影響。
研究結果得知，在「群」的圖片訴求下，「正面」的訊息陳述確實得到比較佳的廣告態度，而在「己」的圖片訴求下，使用「負面」的訊息陳述是比較有效的；在樣本與模特兒性別相同下，「負面」的訊息陳述得到比較高的廣告態度，在樣本與模特兒性別相異下，「正面」的訊息陳述得到比較高的廣告態度；在訴求對象為「自己」下，搭配「反面」的訊息陳述產生較佳的廣告態度，在訴求對象為「他人」且搭配「正面」的訊息陳述則產生較佳的廣告態度。因此在現實的戒菸廣告中，在不同的情境考量下，我們可以使用不同的訊息陳述來對不同的樣本做宣導。

Damage of smoking which affects people’s health at all times has been one of the biggest health problems. Based on the governmental promotion, regulations & the way of carrying out the healthy donation, the condition of smoking damage still hasn’t been improved a lot. However, the smokers only change the places of smoking after the government announces that all of the public places are disallowed to smoke, but it doesn’t decrease the percentage of smokers effectively.
Nowadays, there are a large number of advertisements on ads which are based on the negative description. The main point of the study is going to realize which way of presentation will be more efficient under different situation-positive or negative message framing.
The independence variables contain Message Framing (Positive/Negative), Photo Presentation (Group/Individual), Advertising object (Self/Others), Context Presentation (Focus on photo/Focus on word), Sex diversity of examinees and model (Same/Different), the study is going to add the moderating factor of the benefit preference of smoking, demonstrate how the situation of different combination will result in what kinds of influence.
The research results can be realized that: In 「Group」 situation, use 「Positive」message framing gets better effect, but in 「Individual」 situation, it will be more effective to use 「Negative」 message; The better advertising attitude could be received by using 「Negative」 message framing in 「Same」 sex of sample & models situation, yet in「Different」sex of sample & model situation, the way of using 「Positive」 message framing would get much higher advertising attitude ;In 「Self」situation, use 「Negative」 message framing gets better effect, but in 「Others」 situation, it will be more effective to use「Positive」message.
Therefore, the different message framing could be utilized to persuade various smokers by considering the various situations.

中央社，2006。吸煙二手煙會導致失明 專家籲煙盒加警語，http://www.atlaspost.com/main.php。
方貝瑜，1998。網際網路上個人化廣告與廣告版面位置對廣告效果之影響研究，中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
行政院衛生署，2008。歷年主要死亡原因死亡人數，www.doh.gov.tw。
林建煌，2007。消費者行為，華泰文化。
李家宜，曾柔鳴，黃財尉，2007。從線上寵物遊戲探討兒童對父母角色認同之研究，輔導與諮商學報，第二十九卷第二期，01-14。
黃昭瑋，2004。廣告圖片與文案內容一致性對廣告效果之影響：產品類別、人格類型與廣告設計調和效果之探討，元智大學國際企業研究所論文。
商晨，2007。利益、權利與轉型的實質，社會科學文獻出版社。
國民健康局，2009。健康統計資訊，www.bhp.doh.gov.tw。
董張伊麗，2007。性別角色研究- 教師的身份認同，香港教師中心學報，第六期。
劉秀娟，1999。兩性教育，揚智文化。
310086醫療保健文檔，2009。二手菸害人，http://www.310086.com
英文部份
Alligood, M. R. (1992), “Empathy: The Importance of Recognizing Two Types,” Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 30, 14-17.
Alsop, Ronald (1988), “Advertisiers See Big Gains in Odd Layouts,” The Wall Street Journal, 29(June), 25.
Apanovitch, A. M., D. McCarthy, and P. Salovey (2003), “Using Message
Framing to Motivate HIV Testing among Low-Income, Ethnic Minority
Women,” Health Psychology, 22, 60–67.
Assael, Henry (1998), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, South-Western Pub, 56-99.
Bal, Platteau (1997), “Wealth Inequality and Efficiency on the Commons –Part I : the Unregulated Case,” Oxford Economic Papers, 49, 451–482.
Belizzi, Joseph, and Robert E. Hite (1992), ”Environmental Color, Consumer Feelings, and Purchase Likelihood,” Psychology and Marketing, 9, 347-63.
Block, L. G., and P. A. Keller (1995), “When to Accentuate the Negative:
The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform A Health-Related Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192–203.
Bowles, Samuel, and H. Gintis (1998), “The Moral Economy of Community: Structured Populations and the Evolution of Prosocial Norms,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 3–25.
Brackett, L. K. and B. N. Carr (2001), “Cyberspace Advertising vs. Other Media: Consumer vs. Mature Student Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 5, 23-32.
Broemer, P. (2002), “Relative Effectiveness of Differently Framed Health Messages: The Influence of Ambivalence,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 685–703.
Cronbach, L. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrija, 16, 297-334.
Dan, C., and E. H. Clara (1996), “The Current State of Empathy Research,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, 43(3), 261–274.
Detweiler, J. B., B. T. Bedell, P. Salovey, E. Pronin, and A. J. Rothman (1999), “Message Framing and Sunscreen Use: Gain-Framed Messages Motivate Beach-Goers,” Health Psychology, 18, 189–196.
Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, D. Grewal (1991), “Effects of Price, Br, and Store Information on Buyers'' Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307.
Egan, G. (1975), The skilled helper, Monterey, CA：Brooks/Cole.
Elster, Jon (1995), The Cement of Society, New York: Columbia University
Press.
Fehr, E. and G. Simon (2002), “Altruistic Punishment in Humans,” Nature, 415, 137–140.
Freeman, S., R. B. Wlaker, and B. Latane (1978), “Difffsion of Responsibility and Restaurant Tipping: Cheaper by the Bunch,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 584– 587.
Gladstein, F. A. (1977), “Empathy and Counseling Outcome: An Empirical and Conceptual Review,” Counseling Psychologist, 6(4), 70–77.
Gladstein, G., and J. C. Feldsyein (1980) “A Comparison of the Construct Alidities of Four Measures of Empathy,” Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 13(13), 49-57.
Health Promotion Services, Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services and the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. (1998), It’s Worth the Effort – Quit Manual, Health Promotion Services, Health Department of Western Australia.
Hoffman, M. L. (1987), “The Contribution of Empathy to Justice and Moral Judgment. In N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (Eds.),” Empathy and It Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47-80
Chol, Hyunyi, and F. J. Boster (2008), “Effects of Gain Versus Loss Frame Antidrug Ads on Adolescents” Journal of Communication.
Janiszewski, Chris (1993), “Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 20, December, 376-392.
Kiene, Susan M., William D. Barta, John M. Zelenski, Dee Lisa Cothran (2005), “Why are You Bringing Up Condom Use Now: The Effect of Message Content on Framing Effects of Condom Use Messages,” Health Psychology, 24, 321–326.
Kim, Yeung-Jo (2006), “The Role of Regulatory Focus in Message Framing in Antismoking Advertisement for Adolescents,” Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 143-151.
Kotler, P., and G. Armstrong (1991), Principles of Marketing, Prentice-Hall.
Kogan, Nathan, and Michael A. Wallach (1964), “Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition & Personality,” New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Latane, B., K. Williams, and S. Harkins (1979), “Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822– 832.
Lutz, Richard J. (1991), “The Role of Attitude Theory in Marketing,” Perspectives in Consumer Behavior.
MacKenzie, Scott B., and R. J. Lutz (1989), “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude-Toward-the-ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context,” Journal of Marketing, 53(April), 48-65.
Maheswaran, D., and J. Meyer-Levy (1990), “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367.
Meyerowitz, B. E., and S. Chaiken (1987), “The Effect of Message Framing on Breast-Cancer Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500–510.
Morse, J. M., G. Erson, J. L. Bottorff, O. Yonge, B. O''Brien, S. M. Solberg, and K. H. Mcllveen (1992), “Exploring Empathy: A Conceptual Fit for Nursing Practice,” The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24(4), 273-280.
Morrison, D. G. (1979), “Purchase Intentions and Purchase Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 43, 65-74.
Packing Research (1983), “Packing Research Probes Stopping Power, Label Reading, and Consumer Attitudes Among the Targeted Audience,” Marketing News, July 22, 3.
Robberson, M. R., and R. W. Rogers (1988), “Beyond Fear Appeals: Negative and Positive Persuasive Appeals to Health and Self-Esteem,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 277–287.
Rothman, A., and P. Salovey (1997), “Shaping Perceptions to Motivate Healthy Behavior: The Role of Message Framing,” Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19.
Schiffman, Leon G.and Leslie L. Kanuk (2006), Consumer Behavior, 9th ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Perentice-Hall, Inc.
Shavitt, S., P. Lowrey, and J. Haffner (1998), “Public Attitudes toward Advertising：More Favorable than You Might Think,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.38:4, 7-22.
Shetch, Jagdish N., and B. Mittal (2004), Customer Behavior: A Managerial Perspective, 2nd ed., Thomson South-western.
Smith, G. E. (1996), “Framing in Advertising and the Moderating Impact of Consumer Education,” Journal of Advertising Research, September/October, 49-64.
Thaler, Richard H. (1980), “Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(March), 39-60.
Toll, Benjamin A., P. Salovey, Stephanie S. O’Malley, Crolyn M. Mazure, Amy Latimer, and Sherry A.Mckee (2007), ”Message Framing for Smoking Cessation:The Interaction of Risk Perception and Gender,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman (1981), “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science, 211, 453–458.
Winstanley, M., S. Woodward and N. Walker (1995), “Tobacco in Australia: Facts and Issues,” Victorian Smoking and Health Program.
Woodside, Arch G. and M. Wayne DeLozier (1976), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth Advertising on Consumer Risk Taking,” Journal of Advertising, Fall, 12–19.
Zhao, Guangzhi and C. Pechmann (2007), “The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents'' Response to Antismoking Advertising Campaigns,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44(November), 671-687.