跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 孫輔強
SUN , FU-CHIANG
論文名稱: 悖論領導行為對於建言行為的影響: 以心理安全感為中介變項、信任主管為調節 變項之探討
指導教授: 林文政
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階主管企管碩士班
Executive MBA Program
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 悖論領導行為建言行為心理安全感信任主管
外文關鍵詞: Paradoxical Leadership Behavior, Employee voice behavior, Psychological Safety, Trust in Supervisors
相關次數: 點閱:23下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著科技發展與全球競爭加劇,企業面臨的外部環境不確定性和挑戰增多,如何有效應對矛盾需求成為企業成功與永續發展的關鍵。悖論領導行為強調在靈活性與穩定性、個體需求與團隊需求之間尋求平衡,特別是在面對不同世代員工期望時。年輕員工重視自主性與工作生活平衡,並在感受到心理安全感時,更願意提出創新建議。
    本研究旨在探討悖論領導行為如何影響員工建言行為,並分析心理安全感的中介作用及信任主管的調節作用。研究透過收集來自台灣企業主管與部屬配對的202份有效問卷進行分析。結果顯示,悖論領導行為對員工建言行為具有顯著的正向影響,能有效促進員工提出創新建議並提升組織績效。
    進一步分析顯示,心理安全感在悖論領導與建言行為之間發揮了中介作用。當員工感受到心理安全時,更願意提出改進建議,推動組織創新並增強參與感。儘管信任主管在理論上應有調節作用,實證結果顯示其未達顯著水準。這可能與組織文化、行業特性及領導風格等因素有關,尤其在高權力距離文化中,員工對權威的接受度較高,可能抑制了信任主管的調節效果。
    本研究強調了悖論領導行為與心理安全感對員工建言行為的重要性,並指出信任主管在不同情境下的作用仍需進一步探討。未來研究應深入探討信任主管在不同文化與組織背景下的影響機制。


    Abstract
    With rapid technological advancements and increasing global competition, businesses face greater uncertainty and complexity. Effectively managing conflicting demands is key to organizational success and sustainability. Paradoxical leadership behavior seeks to balance flexibility with stability, and individual needs with team goals, particularly in managing generational differences in employee expectations. Younger employees, who value autonomy and work-life balance, are more likely to offer innovative suggestions when they perceive psychological safety.
    This study explores how paradoxical leadership influences employee voice behavior, analyzing the mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of trust in supervisors. Data from 202 valid questionnaires collected from supervisor-subordinate pairs in Taiwanese enterprises were analyzed. Results show that paradoxical leadership significantly enhances employee voice behavior, fostering innovation and improving organizational performance. Psychological safety plays a key mediating role, encouraging employees to contribute when they feel safe.
    Although trust in supervisors was hypothesized to moderate the relationship between paradoxical leadership and psychological safety, the empirical results did not support this effect. This may be due to conceptual overlap between trust and paradoxical leadership behaviors, or cultural factors such as high power distance, which may reduce the distinct impact of trust.
    These findings suggest that while paradoxical leadership and psychological safety are critical drivers of voice behavior, the role of trust in supervisors may vary depending on contextual and cultural factors.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 一、緒論 1 1-1 研究背景與動機 1 1-2 研究目的 3 1-3 研究預期貢獻 3 二、文獻探討 5 2-1 悖論領導行為 5 2-2 心理安全感 10 2-3 信任主管 11 2-4 建言行為 12 2-5 悖論領導行為對於建言行為的影響 13 2-6 心理安全感在悖論領導行為與建言行為之間的中介效果 14 2-7 信任主管在悖論領導行為與心理安全感之間的調節效果 15 2-8 信任主管在悖論領導行為、心理安全感以及建言行為的調節式中介效果 15 三、研究方法 17 3-1 研究架構與假設 17 3-2 研究樣本與資料蒐集程式 17 3-3 研究工具 18 3-4 資料分析與統計方法 19 四、研究結果 20 4-1 資料來源與樣本特性 20 4-2 信度分析 22 4-3 效度分析 22 4-4 驗證性因素分析 25 4-5 相關分析 26 4-6 迴歸分析與驗證假設 28 五、結論與建議 33 5-1 研究結論 33 5-2 學術貢獻與管理意涵 34 5-3 研究限制與未來研究建議 35 參考文獻 37

    黃芳銘(2015)。結構方程模式-理論與應用。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    Antonakis, J., & Atwater, L. (2017). Leader distance: A review and a proposed
    theory. Leadership perspectives, 129-160.
    Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and
    psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of
    Organizational Behavior: The international journal of industrial, occupational and
    organizational psychology and behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social
    psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of
    personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
    Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (Vol. 6). Encino, CA:
    Multivariate software.
    Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological
    methods & research, 21(2), 230-258.
    Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee
    voice. Academy of management journal, 55(4), 851-875.
    Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The
    role of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems
    Research and Behavioral Science: The official journal of the international federation
    for systems research, 26(1), 81-98.
    Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining
    the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty
    reducer?. Journal of applied psychology, 97(1), 1.
    Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door
    really open?. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869-884.
    Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of management journal, 54(3), 461-488.
    Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-
    level leaders influence employee voice. Organization science, 21(1), 249-270.
    Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user
    computing satisfaction instrument. Mis quarterly, 453-461.
    Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and
    implications for research and practice. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 611.
    Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O'Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter:
    Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 716-
    736.
    Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work
    teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
    Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the
    workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
    Edmondson, A. C., & Woolley, A. W. (2003). Understanding outcomes of organizational learning interventions. International handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. London: Blackwell, 185-211.
    Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of management journal, 50(3), 715-729.
    Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel psychology, 70(1), 113-165.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-
    and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3), 218.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Herman, H. M., Huang, X., & Lam, W. (2013). Why does transformational leadership matter
    for employee turnover? A multi-foci social exchange perspective. The leadership
    quarterly, 24(5), 763-776.
    Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related
    values (Vol. 5). sage.
    Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and
    organizations across nations. Sage publications.
    Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American journal of sociology, 63(6),
    597-606.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
    analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a
    multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and
    aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work
    involvement. Journal of organizational behavior: The international journal of
    industrial, occupational and organizational psychology and behavior, 30(6), 785-804.

    Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to
    leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy
    of management annals, 13(1), 148-187.
    Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of
    management review, 25(4), 760-776.
    Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of management journal, 55(1), 71-92.
    Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of organizational behavior, 35(S1), S139-S157.
    Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational
    trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
    Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks:
    Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational
    behavior and human decision processes, 116(2), 229-240.
    Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of applied psychology, 96(1), 183.
    Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
    Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader
    inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in
    health care teams. Journal of organizational behavior: The international journal of
    industrial, occupational and organizational psychology and behavior, 27(7), 941-966.
    Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of
    the literature. Human resource management review, 27(3), 521-535.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory: 2d Ed. McGraw-Hill.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational
    leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and
    organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
    Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the
    literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698.
    Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management review, 36(2), 381-403.
    Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top
    management model for managing innovation streams. Organization science, 16(5), 522-
    536.
    Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of
    construct and predictive validity. Academy of management journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological methods & research, 16(1), 118-154.
    Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in
    people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of management
    journal, 58(2), 538-566.

    QR CODE
    :::