近年全球氣候變遷問題日益嚴峻，服飾產業作為高碳排產業之一，對環境造成相當巨大的負擔。然而，目前環境教育在服飾減碳方面的應用與研究仍相對有限。本研究旨在探討環境教育是否能有效提升一般民眾對綠色服飾之認知與消費選擇傾向，進而促進個人減碳行為。
本研究採量化研究法，針對北部地區民眾進行問卷調查，並設計前、後測架構，於受測者觀看快時尚環境衝擊與碳標籤相關影片後，比較其環保意識、國際減碳條約認知、碳標籤認知及綠色服飾選擇意願之變化。研究工具包括李克特五點量表與模擬情境選擇題，並以成對樣本t檢定與效果量進行統計分析。
研究結果顯示，環境教育能顯著提升受測者在環保意識、國際減碳條約認知與碳標籤認知等面向的平均得分，且對綠色服飾的選擇傾向亦有明顯提升。此外，本研究亦推估若 50 位受測者其消費行為改變後，將可得到 318.23 kg CO₂e的減碳總量，且當進一步考慮 2024年具消費能力的人口總數時，預計全台該年可減少 95,469 公噸的二氧化碳排放量。此減碳效益雖不如改變飲食習慣來得驚人，但仍是可觀的成效。
綜上所述，環境教育不僅能增進大眾對碳排議題的理解，更可促進具體的綠色消費行動。建議未來相關單位加強對服飾消費領域的環境教育介入，以擴大永續消費之實質效益，並作為政策設計與推動綠色市場的依據。

In response to the growing global concern over climate change, the fashion industry has emerged as a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Despite this, the role of environmental education in influencing consumer behavior related to low-carbon clothing remains underexplored. This study aims to examine whether environmental education can effectively enhance public awareness and promote the consumption of green apparel, thereby contributing to individual carbon reduction efforts.
Using a quantitative research approach, this study surveyed residents in northern Taiwan through a pre-test/post-test questionnaire design. Participants watched two educational videos—one on the environmental impact of fast fashion and another on carbon labeling—before completing a follow-up assessment. The questionnaire measured changes in environmental awareness, knowledge of international carbon reduction treaties, understanding of carbon labels, and willingness to choose low-carbon clothing. Data were analyzed using paired-sample t-tests and effect size calculations.
The research results show that environmental education significantly improved participants’ average scores in areas such as environmental awareness, knowledge of international carbon reduction treaties, and understanding of carbon labeling. Participants also demonstrated a noticeable increase in their preference for green apparel. In addition, this study estimates that the behavioral changes observed among the 50 participants could lead to a total carbon reduction of 318.23 kg CO₂e. When extrapolated to the entire population with purchasing power in Taiwan in 2024, the projected annual national reduction in carbon emissions could reach approximately 95,469 metric tons of CO₂. Although this reduction may not be as dramatic as that achieved through dietary changes, it still represents a considerable and meaningful environmental benefit.
This research highlights the critical role of environmental education in fostering sustainable consumer behavior within the fashion industry. It recommends strengthening educational initiatives targeting clothing consumption to support broader carbon reduction goals and inform green market development strategies.

1. NOAA , Annual Global Analysis for 2022,2022.
2. UNEP, Putting the brakes on fast fashion,2022.
3. Taylor, Clothed in Conservation: Fashion & Water,2020.
4. Greenpeace, 時尚之毒-全球服裝品牌的中國水污染調查，2011。
5. UNFCCC, Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action,2018.
6. Fletcher, K. & Tham, M., Earth Logic Fashion Action Research Plan,2019.
7. Jay et al., Impact of a College Course on the Sustainability of Student Diets in Terms of the Planetary Boundaries for Climate Change and Land, Water, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Use,2021.
8. Jay et al., Reduction of the carbon footprint of college freshman diets after a food-based environmental science course,2019.
9. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our common future, Oxford University Press,1987.
10. Tisdell, C.A., Economics of environmental conservation: economics for environment and ecological management, Edward Elgar Publishing,1991.
11. Veblen, T., The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, Macmillan,1899.
12. 陳慧如，平價時尚消費行為與品牌忠誠度之研究，2014。
13. 日本環境省，サステナブルファッション: 環境負荷を考慮した衣類消費の推進，2020。
14. IEA, CO2 Emissions in 2022,2022.
15. COP26, The glasgow Climate Pact,2021.
16. 蕭新煌，我們只有一個台灣，圓神出版社，1987。
17. 鍾聖，認知心理學，學富文化，1990。
18. Marcinkowski, T. J., An analysis of correlates and predictors of responsible environmental behavior,1988.
19. Kim et al., The Effects of Cause-Related Marketing on Company and Brand Attitudes, 2005.
20. Robert, J. A., Environmental attitudes and sustainable consumption,1996.
21. 行政院環境保護署，行政院環境保護署推動產品碳足跡管理要點，2020。
22. ISO, ISO 14067: Carbon footprint of products Requirements and guidelines for quantification,2018.
23. 行政院環境保護署，產品與服務碳足跡計算指引，2011。
24. Carbon Trust, Carbon Footprint Measurement Methodology,2007.
25. BP, Sustainability report 2007,2007.
26. POST, Carbon footprint of electricity generation,2006.
27. Wiedmann, T. & Minx, J., A Definition of ''Carbon Footprint'',2008.
28. 胡憲倫等編著，國際碳標籤的發展趨勢及現階段臺灣的因應做法介紹，2009。
29. 行政院環保署，產品碳足跡資訊網，2010。
30. Arbuthnott, K., Education for Sustainable Development beyond Attitude Change,2009.
31. Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. ,Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?,2002.
32. Whitmarsh, L. et al., Public engagement with carbon and climate change,2011.
33. Peattie, K., Green Consumption: Behavior and Norms,2010.
34. Fraj, E. & Martinez, E., Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis,2006.
35. Lee, K. & Holden, G., Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behavior,1999.
36. Laroche, M. et al., Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products,2001.
37. Straughan, R. & Roberts, J., Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium,1999.
38. UNFCCC, The Paris Agreement,2015.
39. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,1992.
40. 聯合國氣候變化框架公約，時尚產業氣候憲章，2018。
41. 吳文貴 & 柯佳潔，碳標籤標示對消費者綠色購買意願之影響：碳標籤有用嗎?，2014。
42. Kotler, P., Marketing Management: The Millennium Edition,2000.
43. 榮泰生，AMOS與研究方法，五南出版社，2009。
44. Ross, M. et al., Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests,2017.
45. James, F. et al., The Sacredness of .05: A Note concerning the Uses of Statistical Levels of Significance in Social Science, American Sociological Association ,1965.
46. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge,1988.
47. Ellis, P., The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes, Cambridge University Peess,2010.
48. Zelezny, L. et al., Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism,2000.
49. Thøgersen, J., Norms for Environmentally Responsible Behaviour: An Extended Taxonomy,2006.
50. Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J., Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?,2002.
51. 鄭瑋瑜，台灣人口年齡結構對不同型態消費的影響，2023。
52. 國家發展委員會，國家發展委員會人口推估查詢系統，https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/，2024。
53. 吳文崇，以個人碳足跡行動方案協助達成我國溫室氣體減量目標之可行性探討，2019。