傳統的圓錐貫入試驗可量測錐尖阻抗、袖管摩擦力及孔隙水壓等數據。然而，在土壤層面處，錐尖阻抗無法正確地量測，因此無法準確偵測出土壤層面的位置。本研究在錐尖內部加裝一微音器，擷取圓錐在貫入過程中產生之音波，利用微震音放射之高敏感度，探討砂土之音波特性與錐尖阻抗之關係。
本研究使用一大型剛性土槽進行一系列之室內試驗，採用移動式霣降儀製作試體，對試體施加一預定之氣壓，並以等速率貫入方式進行微音錐貫入試驗。針對砂土於不同相對密度與垂直應力之條件，探討音波反應、錐尖阻抗在貫入過程之變化。
針對不同相對密度與垂直應力之各組試驗，相對密度或垂直應力愈大，所得之錐尖阻抗愈大。而由微震音放射計算所得之方均根音壓亦隨相對密度或垂直應力之增加而變大。
頻譜分析中，各組試驗之主要頻率約為2.3kHz，音壓約在0.1∼0.2Pa之間，此二特性對本研究之砂土具有代表性。音射分析中，音射速率隨相對密度、垂直應力增加而增大。

This research used a large steel tank and an acoustic cone to carry out a series of laboratory cone penetration tests. The specimens were made by a movable sand pluviator. Constant pressures were applied on the sand specimens, and then penetrated the cone into the specimens with a constant speed. Under the conditions of different relative densities of sand and different vertical pressures, the variations of acoustic emission and tip resistance during the penetration were investigated.
From the experimental results, it is understood that the tip resistance increased with the relative densities and vertical pressures. The root mean square values of sound pressure which were obtained from the calculation of acoustic emission, and the values of sound pressure also increased with the relative densities and vertical pressures.
In frequency analysis, the major frequency of each test is about 2.3kHz, and it’s sound pressure is about 0.1~0.2Pa, these properties can represent the speciality of the sand which is used in this research. In acoustic emission analyses, the rate of AE count increased with the relative densities and vertical pressures.

參 考 文 獻
1.土質工學會，土質試驗法，日本土質工學會，第172-188頁(1979)。
2.王啟川、郭弘政，數位信號處理，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，臺北 (1989)。
3.李延恭，「淺談貫入試驗之應用及發展」，地工技術雜誌，第16期，第4∼13頁(1986)。
4.洪兆慶，「音波式圓錐貫入試驗與砂土參數相關性之研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (1997)。
5.徐萬樁，噪音與振動控制，協志工業叢書，臺北 (1984)。
6.梁能，「圓錐貫入試驗中土壤微震音之量測」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢 (1997)。
7.陳泓文，「砂土坡地井樁受側向力之離心機模型試驗」，博士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢 (1999)。
8.秦中天，「電子式兼測水壓貫入錐的應用」，地工技術雜誌，第16期，第23∼31頁(1986)。
9.莊傳業，「微震音放射在圓錐貫入試驗中之應用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢 (1996)。
10.許懷後、黃安斌，「砂土中圓錐貫入試驗之理論基礎」，第六屆大地工程學術研究討論會論文集，嘉義，第376∼384頁(1995)。
11.郭鑑智、曾俊傑、費立沅、左天雄，「貫入試驗評估靜止土壓力係數之研究」，第六屆大地工程學術研究討論會論文集，嘉義，第1∼10頁(1995)。
12.陳斗生，「電子式圓錐貫入儀之工程應用」，地工技術雜誌，第13 期，第62∼76頁(1986)。
13.陳東敏、楊朝欽、林冠平、彭國賢，數位信號處理導論，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，臺北 (1999)。
14.黃安斌、龔浩然，「圓錐貫入試驗在室內之標定」，第五屆大地工程學術研究討論會論文集，臺北，第421∼426頁(1993)。
15.黃建民，「音波式圓錐貫入試驗於土層界面判定之應用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢 (2000)。
16.歐志忠，「黏性土壤中柱體側向抵抗與評估方法之研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢（1991）。
17.蘇德勝，噪音原理及控制，臺隆出版社，臺北（1991）。
18.Acar, Y.B. and Tumay, M.T., “Strain field around cones in steady penetration,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No.2, pp.207-213 (1986).
19.Anderson, W.F. and Pyrah, I.C., “Pressuremeter testing in a clay calibration chamber,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.55-66 (1991).
20.Baldi, G., R. Belotti, V. Ghionna, M. Jamiolkowski, and E. Pasqualini, “Design parameters for sands from CPT,” Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, ESOPT-Ⅱ, pp.425-432 (1982).
21.Baligh, M.M., “Cavity expansion in sands with curved envelopes,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. GT11, pp.1131-1146 (1976).
22.Baligh, M.M., “Strain path method,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.111, No.9, pp.1108-1136 (1985).
23.Been, K., Crooks, J.H.A., Becker, D.E. and Jefferies, M.G., “The cone penetration test in sands : part I, state parameter interpretation,” Geotechnique, Vol.36, No.2, pp.239-249 (1986).
24.Borden, R.H., “Boundary displacement induced by DMT penetration,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.101-118 (1991).
25.Brandon, T.L. and G.W. Clough, “Methods of sample fabrication in the Virginia Tech calibration chamber,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.119-133 (1991).
26.Campanella, R.G and Robertson, P.K., “Current status of the piezocone test,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration Testing/ISOPT1, J. De Ruiter, Ed., Orlando, Florida, pp.93-116 (1988).
27.Carter, J.P., Booker, J.R., and Yeung, S.K., “Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils,” Geotechnique, Vol.36, No.3, pp.349-358 (1986).
28.Chen, J.W. and Juang, C.H., “Determination of drained friction angle of sands from CPT,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 5, pp.374-381 (1996).
29.De Ruiter, J., “Electric penetrometer for site investigations,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol.97, SM2, pp.457-472 (1971).
30.Douglas, B.J. and Olsen, R.S., “Soil classification using electric cone penetrameter,” Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Oct. , St. Louis, pp. 209-227 (1981).
31.Durgunoglu, H.T. and Mitchell, J.K., “Static penetration resistance of soils,” Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference on In-situ Measurement of Soil Parameters, Raleigh, Vol.1, pp.151-189 (1975).
32.Ghionna, V.N. and Jamiolkowski, M., “A critical appraisal of calibration chamber testing of sands,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.13-40 (1991).
33.Holden, J.C., “History of the first six CRB calibration chamber,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.1-12 (1991).
34.Holden, J.C., “Laboratary research on static cone penetrometers,” University of Florida, Gainsville, Department of Civil Engineering, Internal Report, CE-SM-71-1 (1971).
35.Houlsby, G.T. and Hitchman, R., “Calibration chamber tests of a cone penetrometer in Sand,” Geotechnique, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp.39-44 (1988).
36.Huang, A.B. and Ma, M.Y., “An analytical study of cone penetration testsin granular material, ” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp.91-103 （1994）。
37.Jamiolkowski, M. et. al, “New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils,” Theme Lecture, 11th Int. Conf. On Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, pp. 57-154(1985).
38.Koerner, R.M. and Lord, A.E., Jr., “Acoustic emissions in medium plasticity clayey silt,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM1, pp.161-165 (1972).
39.Koerner, R.M. and Lord, A.E., Jr., “Subsurface soil monitoring via acoustic emissions,” Use of In Situ tests in Geotechnical Engineering: Proceedings of In Situ ''86, Specialty Conference, Samuel P. Clemence, Ed., ASCE, pp.176-190 (1986).
40.Koerner, R.M., Lord, A.E., Jr., and McCabe, W.M., “Acoustic emission behavior of cohesive soils,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT8, pp.837-850 (1977).
41.Koerner, R.M., Lord, A.E., Jr., McCabe, W.M., and Curran, J.W., “Acoustic emission behavior of granular soils,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. GT7, pp.761-773 (1976).
42.Koerner, R.M., McCabe, W.M., and Lord, A.E., Jr., “Acoustic Emission Behavior and Monitoring of Soils,” Acoustic Emissions in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP 750, V. P. Drnevich and R. E. Gray, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.93-141 (1981).
43.Kulhawy, F.H., Mayne, P.W., “Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design,” Rpt. EL-6800, Elec. Power Res. Inst.,Palo Alto, pp.306 (1990).
44.Levadoux, J.N. and Baligh, M.M., “Consolidation after undrained piezocone penetration. I: prediction, II: interpretation,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol.112, No.7, pp707-745 (1986).
45.Lunne, T., “Practical use of CPT correlations in sand based on Calibration chamber tests,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.225-235 (1991).
46.Lunne, T., Eidsmoen, T., Gillespie D., and Howland J.D., “Laboratory and field evaluation of cone penetrometers,” Use of In Situ tests in Geotechnical Engineering: Proceedings of In Situ ''86, Specialty Conference, Samuel P. Clemence, Ed., ASCE, pp.714-729 (1986).
47.Massarsch, K. R., “Acoustic penetration testing,” Proceeding of the 4th Geotechnical Seminar, Field Instrumentation and In-Situ Measurements, Nanyang Tech. Inst., Singapore(1986).
48.Mayne, P.W. and Kulhawy, F.H., “Calibration chamber database and boundary effects correction for CPT data,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.257-264 (1991).
49.Mayne, P.W., “Tentative method for estimating σ’h0 from qc data in sands,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.249-256 (1991).
50.Meigh, A.C., Cone penetration testing: methods and interpretation, CIRIA ground engineering report: in-situ testing, Butterworths, London (1987).
51.Muromachi, T., “Phono-sounding apparatus-discrimination of soil type by sound,” Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, ESOPT-Ⅰ, Vol. 21, pp.110-112 (1974).
52.Olson, S.M. and T.D. Stark,, “CPT based liquefaction resistance of sandy soils,” Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE, Vol. 1, pp.325-333（1998）。
53.Parkin, A.K. and T. Lunne, “Boundary Effects in the Laboratory Calibration of a Cone Penetrometer for Sand,” Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, ESOPT-Ⅱ, pp.761-768 (1982).
54.Parkin, A.K., “The calibration of cone penetration,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration Testing/ISOPT1, J. De Ruiter, Ed., Orlando, Florida, pp.221-243 (1988).
55.Peterson, R.W., “Penetration resistance of fine cohesionless materials,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.315-328 (1991).
56.Robertson, P.K. and Campanella, R.G., “Interpretation of cone penetration tests,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No. 20, pp.718-745 (1983).
57.Robertson, P.K. and Campanella, R.G., “Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 111, No.3, pp.384-403(1985).
58.Robertson, P.K., “In situ testing and its application to foundation engineering,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No.23, pp.573-594(1986).
59.Robertson, P.K., “Soil classification using the cone penetration test,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No. 27, pp.151-158 (1990).
60.Salgado, R., Mitchell, J.K. and Jamiolkowski, M., “Cavity expansion and penetration resistance in sand,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol.123, No.4, pp.344-354 (1997).
61.Schmertmann, J. H.,“Guidelines for cone penetration test, performance an design,” Federal Highway Administration, Report FHWA-TS-78-209 (1978).
62.Schmertmann, J. H.,“Static cone to compute static settlement over sand,”Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM3, pp.1011-1043 （1970）.
63.Schnaid, F. and Houlsby, G.T., “Measurement of the properties of sand in a calibration chamber by the cone pressuremeter test,” Geotechnique, Vol.42, No.4, pp.587-601 (1992).
64.Senneset, K. and Janbu, N., “Shear Strength parameter obtained from static cone penetration tests,” ASTM STP 883, Symposium, San Diego (1984).
65.Silvestri, V., Dakroub, H, and Fahmy Y., “Analysis of cone penetration and Indentation tests in clayey soils,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No. 34, pp.254-263 (1997).
66.Spanner, J.C., Brown, A., Hay, D.R., Notvest, K. and Pollock, A. “Foudationals ofacoustic emission testing,”Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd Ed, Vol.5, pp.11-44（1987）
67.Sweeney, B.P. and Clough G.W., “Design of a large calibration chamber,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.36-44 (1990).
68.Tanimoto, K. and Nakamura J., “Studies of acoustic emission in soils,” Acoustic Emissions in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP 750, V. P. Drnevich and R. E. Gray, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.164-173 (1981).
69.Tringale, P.T. and J.K. Mitchell, “An acoustic cone penetrometer for site investigation,” Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, ESOPT-Ⅱ, pp.909-914 (1982).
70.Tringale, P.T., “Soil identification in-situ using an acoustic cone penetrometer, ”Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (1983).
71.Veismanis, A., “Laboratory investigation of electrical friction-cone penetrometers in sand,” Proceedings of European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT- I, Stockholm, Vol. 2.2 (1974).
72.Vesic, A.S., “Expansion of Cavity in Infinite Soil Mass,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM3, pp.265-290 (1972).
73.Villet, W.C.B, “Acoustic emissions during the static penetration of soils,” Ph.D. Dissertation , University of California, Berkeley (1981).
74.Villet, W.C.B., Mitchell,J.K., and Tringale, P.T., “Acoustic emissions generated during the quasi-static cone penetration of soils,” Acoustic Emissions in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP 750, V. P. Drnevich and R. E. Gray, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.174-193 (1981).
75.Voyiadjis, G.Z., Tumay, M.T., and Kurup, P.U., “Miniature piezocone penetration tests on soft soils in a calibration chamber system,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, An-Bin Huang, Ed., Potsdam, New York, pp.377-392 (1991).
76.Yu, H. S.,and Mitchell, J. K., “Analysis of cone resistance：review of methods,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE , Vol. 124,No.2.(1998).
77.Zhang, Z. and Tumay, M.T., “Simplification of soil classification charts derived from the cone penetration test,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, Vol. 19, No.2, pp.203-216 (1996).