| 研究生: |
陳怡潔 Yi-chieh Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
員工企業社會責任感知對企業社會責任活動參與的影響:以組織認同為中介變項 The Relationship between Employees Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility and Their Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Identification. |
| 指導教授: |
劉念琪
Nien-chi Liu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 61 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業社會責任 、組織認同 、公益活動 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Corporate Social Responsibility, , Organizational Identification |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:9 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中文摘要
本研究目的為實證調查員工對於組織認同的連結。部分研究探討企業社會責任感知程度與組織認同有正向關係。另外,調查員工對企業社會責任感知與組織認同能夠正向影響員工對企業社會責任活動的參與。本研究也探討員工其組織認同對於企業社會責任感知及企業社會責任活動參與之關聯的中介效果。
研究樣本來源為2013年公開資訊觀測站中上市上櫃公司,且落實企業社會責任之企業為母體,以便利抽樣的方式取得34家上市上櫃公司之問卷資料,總共發放680份問卷,選出約20至25位員工填寫紙本問卷,回收633份,其中有效問卷為614份作為研究調查之樣本。
本研究結果為,員工會受企業社會責任感知,影響對企業社會責任活動參與,且員工對企業社會責任感知,會受組織認同影響產生正向的態度與行為。另外,組織認同對員工企業社會責任感知與企業社會責任活動參與,具顯著正向關係且為部分中介效果。因此本研究是可以支持員工企業社會責任感知對企業社會責任活動參與的影響會透過組織認同之關聯。
Abstract
Prior research has focused on the positive relationship between CSR perception and organizational identification. It is also suggested that employees CSR perception and organizational identification can both positively influence employees participation in CSR related activities. Thus, this study is to examine the mediating effect of organizational identification between employees CSR perception and CSR activities participation.
Via convenience sampling, 34 companies were selected from companies implementing CSR listed on OTC in 2013. A total number of 680 questionnaires were distributed to 34 companies each. Valid questionnaires were 614, with a response rate of 93%.
Analysis results indicated that employees perception towards CSR affect their participation in CSR related activities. Organizational identification would influence positively on employees perception towards CSR. The results also revealed that organizational identification positively but partially mediated the relationship between employees CSR perception and participation in CSR activities.
中文文獻
1. 王儷倩(2004),團隊成員多元性、凝聚力、角色內行為與組織公民行為關係之研究,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文
2. 世界經濟論壇(World Economic Forum)。http://www.weforum.org/
3. 石雅智(2011)。員工對企業公益活動之參與意願研究,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文,1-45。
4. 別蓮蒂、游舒惠 (2002)。「企業贊助公益活動之動機、決策與影響因素」,廣告學研究,國立政治大學,18集,53~95頁。
5. 吳承訓(2010)。企業志工與非企業志工之工作滿意度、組織承諾與組織公民行為之比較研究,中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
6. 李兆香(2003)。醫院組織文化、領導行為與組織公民行為關係之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
7. 李佩容(2009)。員工企業社會責任知覺對組織承諾與離職傾向影響之實證研究,李政義(1990)。企業社會責任論,台北市: 巨流.
8. 林岑璐(2013)。員工參與公司志工服務方案對組織認同之影響: 一項歷程觀點探討。臺灣大學心理學研究所學位論文,1-147.
9. 孫震(2009)。企業倫理與企業社會責任,台北市: 天下遠見.
10. 翁望回(1987)。企業正當性之實證研究:社會責任的觀點,政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
11. 翁慧圓(2009),社會福利機構運用企業資源與挑戰,社區發展季刊126 期。
12. 高子涵(2010)。企業對企業社會責任的投入程度對員工組織認同、組織公民行為的影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
13. 高希均、林宜諄(2008)。企業社會責任入門手冊,台北市: 天下遠見.
14. 國際勞工組織(International Labour Organization, ILO)。http://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm
15. 國際雇主組織(International Organization of Employers, IOE)。http://www.uscib.org/
16. 梁文彥(2005)。知覺外部聲望對組織認同與組織公民行為關係之跨層次分析-台灣紡織產業實證研究,未出版之碩士論文,輔仁大學織品服裝研究所,台北
17. 梁雙蓮(1984),中央行政機關公務人員組織認同的研究,臺灣大學政治學研究所博士論文。
18. 許士軍(1988),管理學,台北:五南圖書出版公司.
19. 許淑雅(2008)。企業社會責任對組織認同之相關性研究,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
20. 許瑞虹(2014),企業社會責任對員工組織承諾的影響-以工作特性為干擾變數,淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班學位論文,1-112.
21. 陳宜民、鍾道詮(2002)。醫師的社會責任養成教育之我見,國立中央大學哲學研究所應用倫理研究中心
22. 陳茂成(2003)。企業永續經營關鍵因素之研究,國立成功大學碩士論文。
23. 陳嫣如(1993)。〈從企業公益贊助探討社會福利機構可行的勸募策略〉,私立東吳大學社會工作研究所未出版碩士論文。
24. 黃營杉,齊德彰 (2005)。「企業倫理、社會責任與慈善公益作為之研究-以台灣高科技電子產業為例」,人文暨社會科學期刊,第一卷第二期,53~95頁。
25. 靳國芬(2010)。國小教師心理契約、組織認同與組織公民行為關聯性之研究,國立新竹教育大學人力資源發展研究所碩士論文。
26. 臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系學位論文,1-152.
27. 歐盟(European Union, EU)。http://europa.eu/index_en.htm
28. 潘珏汝(2010)。探討員工企業社會責任之認知對組織公民行為之影響-以組織承諾為中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
29. 聯合國「全球盟約」(The UN Global Compact)。https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
30. 聯合國志工組織(United Nation Volunteer, UNV)。http://www.unv.org/
31. 聯合國的世界企業永續發展委員會(World Business Council for Sustainable Development,WBCSD)。http://www.wbcsd.org/home.aspx
32. 謝惠嬪(2008)。中華電信企業公益行為之研究,世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所碩士論文
英文文獻
1. Ashforth, B. E., &Mael, F. (1989).Social identity theory and the organization.Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
2. Berglind, M., & Nakata, C. (2005). Cause-related marketing: More buck than bang?. Business Horizons, 48(5), 443-453.
3. Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953).Social responsibility of the businessman.Harper.
4. Cheney, G. (1983). On the various changing meanings of organization membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50,342-362.
5. Chong, M. (2009). Employee participation in CSR and corporate identity: Insights from a disaster-response program in the Asia-Pacific. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 106-119.
6. Dutton, J. E., &Dukerich, J. M. (1991).Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation.Academy of management journal, 34(3), 517-554.
7. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., &Harquail, C. V. (1994).Organizational images and member identification.Administrative science quarterly, 239-263.
8. Forehand, M.R. and Grier, S. (2003), “When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated intenton consumer skepticism”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 349-56.
9. Freeman, R. E. (1983). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Advances in strategic management, 1(1), 31-60.
10. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (pp. 173-178). springer berlin heidelberg.
11. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995).The correspondence bias.Psychological bulletin, 117(1), 21.
12. Grahn, J. L., Hannaford, W. J., & Laverty, K. J. (1987). Corporate philanthropy and marketing strategy: A review and directions for research. AMA Educators' Proceeds, Series, 53, 67-69.
13. Grimble, R., &Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural systems, 55(2), 173-193.
14. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984).Managing public relations (Vol. 343). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
15. Hay, R. D., Gray, E. R., & Gates, J. E. (Eds.). (1976). Business & Society: Cases and Text. South Western Publishing Company.
16. Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992).Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of management studies, 29(2), 131-154
17. Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 857-878.
18. Jones T., (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: ASynthesis of Ethics and Economics, Academy ofManagement Review, 20, 404-437.
19. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution.American psychologist, 28(2), 107.
20. Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010).Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557-569.
21. Mael, F., &Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
22. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001).Corporate citizenship as a marketinginstrument-Concepts, evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457-484.
23. Masher, P. (1984).What corporations get by giving. BusinessMarketing, Dec., 80-89.
24. Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000).Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4), 626-658.
25. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome .Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
26. Pancer, S. M., Baetz, M. C., &Rog, E. J. (2002). Corporate volunteer programs: Benefits for employees, corporations, and the community. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
27. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., &Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
28. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
29. Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. (2001).The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification.Academy of Management journal, 44(5), 1051-1062.
30. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., &Flament, C. (1971).Social categorization and intergroup behaviour.European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
31. Tuffrey, Michael. (2003). Good companies, better employees – how community involvement andgood corporate citizenship can enhance employee morale, motivation, commitment andperformance. London: The Corporate Citizenship Company
32. Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. A. (2013). Feeling good by doing good: Employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. Journal of business ethics, 118(3), 577-588.
33. Wan‐Huggins, V. N., Riordan, C. M., &Griffeth, R. W. (1998).The development and longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8), 724-749.