本研究針對不同中空斷面之高強度中空雙鋼管混凝土構件之承載行為進行探討，研究中以一系列組合載重試驗，界定構件空心比與其極限強度、韌性、勁度衰減及能量消散等結構行為之關係。研究結果顯示，在適當之空心比配置下，構件之極限強度與韌性均可優於具相同斷面尺度之鋼管混凝土構件。由試驗結果發現空心比之增加將降低構件之變形能力與其能量消散之能力。實驗結果亦發現，高強度中空雙鋼管混凝土柱之非彈性勁度與其位移比呈自然對數之關係，空心比愈大者，其勁度之衰減速率愈快。本研究中亦由研究結果歸納設計公式，以供中空雙鋼管混凝土構件工程應用之參考。

This study focused on the seismic performance evaluation of high strength sandwich composite members. A series of combined loading tests on members with various sectional compositions were conducted to investigate the relationship between the sections’ void ratios and the members’ strength, stiffness, and ductility. It was found from the test results that the strength and ductility of sandwich members with adequate sectional void ratios were higher than those of concrete-filled tubes with similar dimensions. Test results also showed that the members’ deformation and energy dissipation capacities decreased when the sectional void ratios increased. It was further validated from response comparisons that the members’ stiffness deterioration rates were larger when the members’ sectional void ratios increased. A simplified expression for member stiffness evaluation was proposed for engineering practice references.

[ 1 ] AISC, Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, 2005.
[ 2 ] ACI, Buildings Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (ACI 318R-05), American Concrete Institute Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2005.
[ 3 ] BSI, Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, Part 1.1 General Rules and Rules for Buildings, British Standards Institution, DD ENV 1994-1-1, London, 1994.
[ 4 ] Furlong, R.W.,“Strength of Steel-Encased Concrete Beam Columns”, Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.93, ST5, pp.113-124, 1967.
[ 5 ] Hsu, T. T. C., “Torsion of Structural Concrete—Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Members ”, Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 322-323, 1968.
[ 6 ] Ge, H. B. and Usami, T.,“Strength of Concrete-Filled Thin-Wall Steel Box Columns : Experiment”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.118, No.11, pp.3036-3054, 1992.
[ 7 ] Usami, T. and Ge, H. B., “Ductility of Concrete-Filled Steel Box Columns under Cyclic Loading”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.120, No.7, pp.2021-2040, 1994.
[ 8 ] Boyd, P. F. , Cofer W. F. and Mclean, D. I., “Seismic Performance of Steel-Encased Concrete Columns under Flexural Loading”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 92, No.3, May-June, pp.355-364, 1995.
[ 9 ] Usami, T. and Ge, H. B., “Ductility of Thin-Walled Steel Box Stub-Columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.126, No.11, pp.1304-1311, 2000.
[ 10 ] Ricles, J. M., Sause, R. and Lu, L. W., “Seismic Behavior of High Strength Square CFT Beam-Columns”, Composite and Hybrid Structures, Vol.51, pp.547-556, 2000.
[ 11 ] Hsu, H. L. and Liang, L. L., “Performance of Hollow Composite Members Subjected to Cyclic Eccentric Loading”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.32, pp.443-461, 2003.
[ 12 ] Fang, I. K. and Shiau, J. K.,“Torsional Behavior of Normal- and High-Strength Concrete Beams ”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol.101, No.3, pp.304-313, 2004.
[ 13 ] Han, L. H., Yao, G. H. and Tao, Zhong, “Performance of
Concrete-Filled Thin-Walled Steel Tubes under Pure Torsion”,
Thin -Walled Structures, Vol.45, pp.24-36, 2007.
[ 14 ] 內政部建築研究所，鋼骨鋼筋混凝土構造設計規範與解說，營
建出版社，台北市，2004。
[ 15 ] 邱勝榮，鋼管混凝土承受軸心載重或雙軸向偏心載重之結構行
為，國立台灣工業技術學院，碩士論文，1990。
[ 16 ] 林江麟，中空雙鋼管混凝土複合構件承載行為研究，國立
中央大學，碩士論文，1997。
[ 17 ] 陳逸瑋，鋼管混凝土柱形狀因素於扭轉韌性行為研究，國立中
央大學，碩論文，2002。
[ 18 ] 陳文雄，王勇智，結構混凝土—力學行為與設計，三版，新
文京書局，台北縣，2006。
[ 19 ] 莊佳霖，鋼骨鋼筋混凝土梁遲滯模式及耐震行為研究，國立中
央大學，博士論文，2006。