台灣自1999年制定科學技術基本法後，開啟「與大專院校進行技術移轉活動」。1996年經濟部中小企業處設立第一家學術型創新育成中心，育成服務正式開跑。此兩大主軸一直是台灣產學合作歷程中最重要的模式。透過本研究迴歸模型捕捉影響產業界是否進行產學合作之因素，可以發現資本額、員工人數、公立機關技術合作與產業競爭程度四項變數對於產學合作是有影響的。另外　　在資本額較小的廠商群中製造業與產學合作呈現負向之關係。此外在政府政策上，由於政府推動產學合作之初衷，是為了提高新創廠商存活率以及減少廠商取得新技術之風險與成本，但由本研究調查結果卻顯示出，部分廠商反而認為進行產學合作會耗費大量成本，產學合作未達效益。故本研究分別對於產學合作議題提出兩點建議。第一：規劃出專門針對大廠商之產學合作方式。本研究認為可以專門成立一諮詢機構，此單位之執掌在於負責資本額超過一定額度之廠商欲進行產學合作時，有其連繫之窗口，建立起有別於一般創新育成中心之產學合作機構。第二本研究認為，政府未來在設置相關產學合作機構時，應更審慎評估此機構設立之目標與宗旨，避免資源重覆之情況再發生，此外針對目前相近功能之產學合作機構應予以合併或裁撤以集中資源。

Since 1999, the government in Taiwan set up Science and Technology Basic Law and opened technology transfer with university. Since 1996, Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs established the first incubation center and started incubation services. The two ways are the most important things in university-industry cooperation history of Taiwan.
Through the study in the regression model, we can find that the four variables, capital, the number of employees technical cooperation with public institutions, the degree of industrial competitiveness have impacts on university-industry cooperation. In additional, firms which have smaller capital in manufacturing industry have negative relationship with university-industry cooperation. In government policy, the purpose of that government drive university-industry cooperation is to increase the survival rate of new firms and to decrease risk and cost of acquiring new technology, but this study shows some firms think university-industry cooperation will spend a lot of money and not achieve benefit.
Finally we make three suggestions for university-industry cooperation subject from the study. First, government plans the way of university-industry cooperation especially for big-sized firms. This study shows that establish consolation institution for capital surpassing the specified amount differ from general incubation centers. Second, the government should assess the goal of setting related university-industry cooperation institutions in the future to avoid wasting capacity. Third, government should merge or deactivate university-industry cooperation institutions which have similar function to centralize capacity.

一　中文
1. 王健全，1992，產業特性對研發策略聯盟之影響，台灣經濟研究月刊。
2. 王健全，1993，影響臺灣製造業共同研發活動之因素及其可行性之探討，經濟專論。　
3. 江炯聰，1981，工業技術之創新、移轉與採用，工業技術第八十六期。
4. 江雪嬌，2004，從國家創新系統探討大學推動研發服務業的推動，經濟情勢暨評論。
5. 李佩芸，2009，創新活動空間關聯性之研究—以台灣地區為例，中國文化大學，碩士論文。
6. 李鳳梧，1998，科技創新育成中心關鍵成功因素之研究，國立中山大學，碩士論文。
7. 林佳樺，2002，育成中心影響廠商創新活動成效之研究，國立台灣大學，碩士論文。
8. 林騰蛟與張可立，2005，政府在產學合作中的角色與作用，建國科大學報。
9. 林姵君，2006，我國大學產學合作現況與展望之研究—以學術型創新育成中心為例，國立成功大學，碩士論文。
10. 洪鉛財與張文龍，2002，創新育成中心近駐戶類型與培育服務需求關係探討－育成中心觀點，管理與資訊學報。
11. 徐作聖，1999，科技政策與國家創新系統，華泰書局。
12. 陳信宏，2004，研發國際化與地主國區位優勢：旗艦級跨國企業在兩岸研發中心之比較，台灣管理學刊。
13. 廖盈琪，2003，產學合作之創新分析，科技發展標竿。
14. 劉慶瑞，預定民國98年7月出版，日本產學合作之績效與現況。
15. 蔡孟潔與蔡智達，2007，大學技轉及育成中心的迷失與困境，政大智慧財產評論。
16. 蔡明義，2002，企業技術能力發展與產學合作關係之研究，國立成功大學，碩士論文。
17. 蔡淑梨，2000，從經營機制與功能檢視台灣創新育成中心的營運成效與適切性，商管科技季刊。
18. 盧彥戎，2003，人格特質、創業策略、創新育成中心服務項目對新創事業績效之影響，實踐大學，碩士論文。
19. 魏嘉慧，2003，國內育成中心經營績效之評估-資料包絡分析法（DEA）之應用，實踐大學，碩士論文。
20. 蘇顯揚，2000，日本協助中小企業創新育成中心措施之研究，經濟部。
二　英文
1. Bloedon, R. V., and Stoke, D. R., 1994, ‘Making University-Industry Collaborative Research Succeed’, Research Technology Management, vol.37(2), pp.44-49.
2. Bozeman B., 2000, ‘Technology Transfer and Public Policy：A Review of Research and Theory’, Research policy, vol. 29, pp.627-655.
3. Carayannis, E. G., 1998, ‘The Strategic Management of Technological Learning in Project/Program Management’, Technovation, vol. 18, Number 11, pp.697-703.
4. David, N. A. and Richard. M., 1990, ‘Structure, Policy, Service, and Performance in the Business Incubator Industry’, Entrepreneurship：Theory and Practice, pp.61-62.
5. Duff, A., 2000, Best Practice in Business Incubator Manegement, AUSTEP Strategic Partnering Pty Ltd.
6. Durand, R. and Vargas, V., 2003, ‘Ownership, Organization, and Private Firms'' Efficient Use of Resources’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, Number7, pp.667.
7. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L., 1997, ‘Triple-Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations’, Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy, vol. 58, Number 2, pp.191 – 203.
8. European Commission, 2002, ‘Innovation & Technology Transfer-Innovation Scoreoboard’, Innovation & Technology Transfer, pp.1-24.
9. Geisler, E. and Rubenstein, A., 1989, ‘University-Industry Relations: A Review of Major Issues in A Link & Tassey (eds.) ’, Cooperative Research; New Strategies for Competitiveness, New York: ST. Martin Press, pp.43-62.
10. Hameri, A., 1996, ‘Technology Transfer between Basic Research and Industry’ Technobation, vol. 16, Number2, pp.51-57.
11. Harmon, Brian and Alexnder, Ardidhvili and Richard, Cardozo and Tait, Elder and John, Leuthold and John, Parshall and Michael, Raghian and Donald, Smith, 1997, ‘Mapping the Technology Transfer Process’, Journal of Business Venture vol. 12, pp.423-434.
12. Jacob, M., Hellstrom, T., Adler, N. and Norrgren, F., 2000, ‘From Sponsorship to Partnership in Academy-Industry Relations’, R&D Management, vol. 30, Number. 3, pp. 255-262.
13. Lambe, C. J. and Spekman, R.E., 1997, ‘Alliances External Technology Acquisition and Discontinuous Technological Change’, Journal of Production Innovation Management, vol.14, pp.102-116.
14. Martino, J. P., 1996, ‘The Role of University Research Institutes in Technology Transfer’, Industry and Higher Education, vol. 10, Number 5, pp.316-320.
15. Peter, L. and Fusfeld, H., 1982, University industry research relationships, National Science Foundation, USA.
16. Robinson, R. D., 1988, The International Transfer of Technology, Ballinger Publishing Company, U.S.A.
17. Rothaermel, F. T., 2003, ‘Incubator Firm Failure or Graduation? The Role of University Linkages’, SSRN Archival Database,Georgia Institute of Technology - Strategic Management Area.
18. Ruth, S.K., 1996, ‘Successful Business Alliance. Classroom Strategies’, The Methodology of Business Education, vol. 34, pp. 10-23.
19. Santoro, M. D., 2000, ‘Success Breeds Success: The Linkage Between Relationship Intensity and Tangible Outcomes in Industry-University Collaborative Venture’, Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 11, Number 2, pp. 255-273.
20. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E. and Link, A.N., 2004, ‘Toward A Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 21, Number 1-2, pp.115-42.
21. Smilor, R and Matthews, J., 2004, ‘University Venturing: Technology Transfer and Commercialisation in Higher Education’, International Journal Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, vol. 3, pp. 111-128.
22. Smith, G. V. and Parr, R. L., 1989, Valuation Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
23. Solo, R.A. and Rogers, E. M., 1972, Key Concept and Model Inducing Technological Change for Economic Growth and Development, Michigan State University Press.
24. Steffens, R., 1992, ‘What the Incubator have Hatched’, Planning, vol. 58.
25. Valentin, E. M., 2000, ‘University-Industry Cooperation: A Framework of Benefits and Obstacles’, Industry and Higher Education, vol. 3, pp.165-172.
26. Vedovello, C., 1997, ‘Science Parks and University-Industry Interaction: Geographical Proximity Between the Agents as a Driving Force’, Technovation, vol. 17, Number 9, pp.491-502.
三　其他
1. 2008年「行政院產業人力套案加值產學 (研) 合作連結創新」簡報。
2. 國科會網站：http://web1.nsc.gov.tw/。
3. 教育部網站：http://www.edu.tw/。
4. 教育部整合型產學合作推動計畫規劃報告。
5. 經濟部中小企業處網站：http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1。