本研究在實驗室內進行不同堆積型態之堆積體，因上游之滲流作用造成堆積體破壞，並轉化為顆粒流之渠道試驗。試驗過程中以高速攝影機進行影像攝影記錄其過程，再以影像分析處理，並探討顆粒堆積體內部因後方水體滲流作用下之破壞歷程、後方水深、顆粒流體運動特性、以及在不同型態之顆粒堆積體因侵蝕堆積床造成顆粒流之捲增效應。顆粒流因堆積型態與供水量、傾斜坡度條件之差異使顆粒流流動型態有所差異。顆粒流之波峰在固定底床條件下高度呈現遞減趨勢，而在堆積底床條件下，因顆粒堆積體在破壞過程中會侵蝕底床，而有捲增效應使土石流整體前鋒呈遞增之趨勢。

In this study, the mobilization process of a deposited plie due to upstream seepage failure was experimentally investigated in a flume. The flow patterns of the granular flows depend on the channel slope, seepage discharge and the bed deposition. For a rigid bed, the surge height decays with distance. For a loose bed, the wet granular flow entrains particles of the bed during the mobilization process, and the surge height grows with distance due to the entrainment effect.

[1] 涂秉杰 (2015)，“潰壩流撞擊直立平板之流況分析”，國立中央大學木工 程學系研究所，碩士論文。
[2] 林聖景 (2017)，“渠床堆積顆粒體之滲流破壞過程及撞擊力分析”，國立中央大學木工程學系研究所，碩士論文。。
[3] 高橋保、匡尚富 (1988)，「天然ダムの決壊による土石流の規模に関する研究」，京都大學防災研究所年報，第31 號，B-2，1988。
[4] 黃子益 (2016)，“滲流引致渠床顆粒堆積之潰散過程分析”，國立中央大學木工程學系研究所，碩士論文。
[5] 謝正倫(1991)，土石流預警系統之研究, 國立成功大學台南水工試驗所研究試驗報告, 130 號。
[6] 張立憲 (1985)，“土石流特性之探討”，中華水土保持學報，第16 卷，第1 期，第135-141 頁。
[7] 詹錢登 (1997)，“土石流理論教材大綱”，行政院教育部顧問室，編號86-土木-教材-C011。
[8] 詹錢登 (2004)，「土石流概論」， 科技圖書股份有限公司，台北。
[9] 周憲德、李璟芳，黃郅軒，張友龍 (2013)，「火炎山礫石型土石流之監測與流動特性分析」，中華民國水土保持學報，第44 卷，第2 期，頁144-157。
[10] 水土保持學會 (2005)，“水土保持手冊”，中華水土保持學會。
[11] 山口伊佐夫 (1985)，“防砂工程學”，國立台灣大學森林學系譯，台北，第150-174 頁。
[12] 游繁結、賴建信 (1996)，“不同粒徑組成之土石流流動特性研究”，中華水土保持學報，第27 卷，第3 期，第213-222 頁。
[13] Barbolini M., A. Biancardi, F. Cappabianca, L. Natale, M. Pagliardi (2005), “ Laboratorystudy of erosion processes in snow avalanches”, Cold Reg Sci Technol,43, pp. 1–9.
[14] Cui P. (1999), “Impact of debris flow on river channel in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River”, International Journal of Sediment Research,14(2):, pp. 201–203.
[15] Dufresne A. (2012), “Granular flow experiments on the interaction with stationary runout path materials and comparison to rock avalanche events”, Institute of Geological Sciences, Geology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany.
[16] Gauer P., D. Issler (2004), “Possible erosion mechanisms in snow avalanche”, Ann Glaciol,38, pp. 384–392.
[17] Gregoretti C. (2000), “The initiation of debris flow at high slopes: experimental results”, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 38, pp. 83–88.
[18] Hungr O., SG. Evans (2004), “Entrainment of debris in rock avalanches: an analysis of a long run-out mechanism”, Geological Society of America Bulletin ,116(9/10), pp. 1240–1252.
[19] Hungr O., S. McDougall, MJ. Bovis (2005), “Entrainment of material by debris flows”, In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena.Springer, Berlin, pp. 135–158.
[20] Legros F. (2002), “The mobility of long-runout landslides, Eng. Geol.”, 63, pp. 301– 331.
[21] Lu P.Y., X.G. Yang, F.G Xu, T.X Hou and J.W Zhou (2016), “An analysis of the entrainment effect of dry debris avalanches on loose bed materials”, Springer. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3272-4.
[22] Mangeney A., L. S. Tsimring, D. Volfson, I. S. Aranson, and F. Bouchut (2007), “Avalanche mobility induced by the presence of an erodible bed and associated entrainment”, Geophysical Research Letters, VOL. 34, L22401, doi:10.1029/2007GL031348.
[23] Mangeney A., O. Roche, O. Hungr, N. Mangold, G. Faccanoni, A. Lucas1 (2010), “ Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds”, Journal of Geophysical Research, VOL. 115, F03040, doi:10.1029/2009JF001462.
[24] McDougall S., O. Hungr (2005), “Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides.”,Can Geotech J,42, pp. 1437–1448.
[25] Sovilla B., P. Burlando, P. Bartelt (2006), “Field experiments and numerical modeling of mass entrainment in snow avalanches”, Journal of Geophysical Research. doi:10.1029/2005JF000391.
[26] Takahashi T. (1978), “Mechanical characteristics of debris flow”, J.Hydraulics Div., ASCE, Vol. 104, No. 8, pp. 1153-1169.
[27] Tognacca C., G.R. Bezzola, H.E. Minor (2000), “Threshold criterion for debris flow initiation due to channel bed failure”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Debris Flow Hazards Mitigation Taipei, pp. 89–97.