| 研究生: |
林盈宏 Ying-Hung Lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
飽和砂土中圓錐貫入引發之音射特性 Using Acoustic Cone Penetration Test onAcoustic Emission Characteristics in saturated sand. |
| 指導教授: |
張惠文
Huei-Wen Chang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 91 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 106 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 頻譜分析 、音射發生率 、均方根音壓 、錐尖阻抗 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | acoustic emission rate, frequency spectrum, cone resistance, root mean square of sound pressure |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
圓錐貫入試驗在工程上的應用主要有土壤分類、推求土壤工程性質與相關參數及評估土層支承力與液化等,其中以土壤分類與土層研判為最常應用的項目。本研究在貫入圓錐錐頭部分裝置微型麥克風,量測土壤在貫入過程所產生的音射訊號,藉由音波的反應來改進量測的準確度。
本研究針對在不同覆土壓力及相對密度之條件下的飽和砂土貫入實驗,同時量測錐尖阻抗與音射訊號,分別就錐尖阻抗及均方根音壓、頻譜分析於貫入之反應進行探討。
試驗結果顯示,於飽和砂土中,錐尖阻抗會隨著深度的增加而持續上升。而不同相對密度與覆土壓力之各組試驗,當相對密度或覆土壓力愈大,所得之錐尖阻抗與均方根音壓亦愈大。將此結果與王志偉(2002)所進行之乾砂反應相比較,發現在飽和砂土中之錐尖阻抗、均方根音壓及音射發生率都比乾砂低。
頻譜分析中,福隆砂、峴港砂與西螺砂之頻譜,主要頻率分佈於2~4kHz之間,而音壓約在0.1~0.25Pa之間。音射分析中,隨著相對密度與覆土壓力的增加,音射發生率會有提高的趨勢。
Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) are usually applied to the investigation of soil classification, determination of soil parameters, estimation of bearing capacity of soil and judgement of liquefaction. This research installed a mini microphone into the cone tip to measure acoustic signal during cone penetration into soil. So the accuracy of testing results will be improved by using this high sensitivity of acoustic signal.
This research measured the cone resistance and acoustic signal in saturated sand to study the response of cone resistance, root mean square of sound pressure and frequency spectrum in cone penetration tests.
The results mean that the cone resistance in the saturated sand will increase continuously with depth. It is also shown that the cone resistance, RMS of sound pressure and AE rate of the saturated sand would be increased with the increase of relative density and overburden pressure. Take these results to compare with that of dry sand measured by Wang(2002), it can be found that the cone resistance, root mean square of sound pressure and acoustic emission rate of the saturated sand is lower than that of the dry sand.
The analysis of frequency spectrum of Fulong Sand, Danang Sand and Shiluo Sand showed that the major frequency distributions of these tests are located at the range of 2kHz~4kHz, and the sound pressures are about 0.1Pa to 0.25Pa. The rate of acoustic emission count rate increased with the relative densities and overburden pressures.
參 考 文 獻
1. 土質工學會,土質試驗法,日本土質工學會,第172-188頁(1979)。
2. 土質工學會,土質調查法,日本土質工學會,第247-248頁(1979)。
3. 王啟川、郭弘政,數位信號處理,全華科技圖書股份有限公司,第41~43頁,台北 (1989)。
4. 王志偉,「微音錐應用於土壤音射特性之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (2002)。
5. 方治國,「音洩檢測原理與應用」,檢測科技,第十六卷,第一期,第4-9頁 (1998)。
6. 古志生,「CPT土壤分類及液化評估之研究」,博士論文,國立成功大學土木工程學系,台南 (2001)。
7. 何家榮,「圓錐貫入試驗中土壤音壓之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (2001)。
8. 李延恭,「淺談貫入試驗之應用及發展」,地工技術雜誌,第16期,第4~13頁 (1986)。
9. 宋雲崴,「土壤微震音放射之量測研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (1999)。
10. 吳石順,「高科技之材料檢測」,全華科技圖書股份有限公司,台北 (1992)。
11. 林宸生、邱創乾、陳德清,「數位訊號處理實物入門」,高立圖書有限公司,台北 (1999)。
12. 洪兆慶,「音波式圓錐貫入試驗與砂土參數相關性之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (1997)。
13. 徐萬樁,噪音與振動控制,協志工業叢書,第168~170頁,台北 (1984)。
14. 歐志中,「黏性土壤中柱體側向抵抗與評估方法之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (1991)。
15. 莊傳業,「微震音放射在圓錐貫入試驗中之應用」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (1996)。
16. 許懷後,「模擬現況中砂土之圓錐貫入試驗」,博士論文,國立,交通大學土木工程學系,新竹 (1999)。
17. 陳斗生,「電子式圓錐貫入儀之工程應用」,地工技術雜誌,第13期,第62~76頁 (1986)。
18. 黃安斌、何應璋、葉嘉鎮,「雲林麥寮粉土細砂之工程性質」,地工技術雜誌,第67期,第55~68頁 (1998)。
19. 黃建民,「音波式圓錐貫入試驗於土層界面判定之應用」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢 (2000)。
20. Anderson, W.F. and Pyrah, I.C., “Pressuremeter testing in a clay calibration chamber,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCT1, Potsdam, New York, pp.55-66 (1991).
21. Been, K., Crooks, J.H.A., Becker, D.E., and Jefferies, M.G., “The cone penetration test in sands : part I, state parameter interpretation,” Geotechnique, Vol.36, No.2, pp.239-249 (1986).
22. Douglas, B.J. and Olsen, R.S., “Soil classification using electric cone penetrameter,” Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Oct., St. Louis, pp.209-227 (1981).
23. Dunegan, H.L. and Green, A.T., “Factors Affecting Acoustic Emission Response From Materials,” Acoustic Emission, ASTM STP505, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.100-113 (1972).
24. Ghionna, V.N. and Jamiolkowski, M., “A critical appraisal of calibration chamber testing of sands,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration ChamberTesting/ISOCCT1, Potsdam, New York, pp.13-40 (1991).
25. Holden, J.C., “Laboratary research on static cone penetrometers,” University of Florida, Gainsville, Department of Civil Engineering, Internal Report, CE-SM-71-1 (1971).
26. Hardy, H.R., “Application of acoustic emission techniques to rock mechanics research,” Acoustic Emission, ASTM STP505, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.41-83 (1972).
27. Hardy, H.R. Jr., “Application of acoustic emission techniques to rock and rock structures : a state of the art review,” Acoustic Emission in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP750, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.4-92 (1981).
28. Houlsby, G.T. and Hitchman, R., “Calibration chamber tests of a cone penetrometer in Sand,” Geotechnique, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp.39-44 (1988).
29. Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R., Tordella, L. and Battaglio, M., “Undrained Strength from CPT”, Proceeding of the European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-Ⅱ, Amsterdam, Vol.2, pp.599-606 (1982)
30. Koerner, R.M., McCabe, W.M., and Lord, A.E., “Acoustic Emission Behavior and Monitoring of Soils,” Acoustic Emissions in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP 750, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.93-141 (1981).
31. Koerner, R.M. and Lord, A.E., Jr., “Subsurface soil monitoring via acoustic emissions,” Use of In Situ tests in Geotechnical Engin- eering : Proceedings of In Situ ''86, Specialty Conference, ASCE, pp.176-190 (1986).
32. Massarsch, K. R., “Acoustic penetration testing,” Proceeding of the 4th Geotechnical Seminar, Field Instrumentation and In-Situ Measurements, Nanyang Tech. Inst., Singapore (1986).
33. Muromachi, T., “Cone Penetration Testing in Japan,” Proceeding of the ASCE National Convention at St. Louis, Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, pp.178-208(1981).
34. Mitchell, J.K., “New Developments in Penetration Tests and Equipment,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration Testing/ISOPT1, Orlando, Florida, pp.245-261 (1988).
35. Ohtsu, M., “Acoustic Emission Characteristics in Concrete and Diagnostic Applications,” Journal of Acoustic Emissions, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.99-108 (1987).
36. Olsen, R.S. and Mitchell, J.K., “CPT stress normalization and predication of soil classification,” Proceeding of the International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing-CPT’95, Linkoping, Sweden, October (1995).
37. Parkin, A.K. and Lunne, L., “Boundary Effects in the Laboratory Calibration of a Cone Penetrometer for Sand,” Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, ESOPT-Ⅱ, pp.761-768 (1982).
38. Parkin, A.K., “The calibration of cone penetration,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration Testing/ISOPT1, Orlando, Florida, pp.221-243 (1988).
39. Robertson, P.K., “In situ testing and its application to foundation engineering,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No.23, pp.573-594 (1986).
40. Robertson, P.K., “Soil classification using the cone penetration test,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No. 27, pp.151-158 (1990).
41. Salgado, R., Mitchell, J.K., and Jamiolkowski, M., “Cavity expansion and penetration resistance in sand,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol.123, No.4, pp.344-354 (1998).
42. Spanner, J.C., Brown, A., Hay, D.R., Notvest, K., and Pollock, A.,“Foundationals of acoustic emission testing,” Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd Ed., Vol. 5, pp11-44 (1987).
43. Tanimoto, K. and Nakamura J., “Studies of acoustic emission in soils,” Acoustic Emissions in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP 750, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 164-173 (1981).
44. Tringale, P.T. and Mitchell, J.k., “An acoustic cone penetrometer for site investigation,” Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, ESOPT-Ⅱ, pp. 909-914 (1982).
45. Tringale, P.T., “Soil identification in-situ using an acoustic cone penetrometer,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (1983).
46. Villet, W.C.B, “Acoustic emissions during the static penetration of soils,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (1981).
47. Villet, W.C.B., Mitchell, J.K., and Tringale, P.T., “Acoustic emissions generated during the quasi-static cone penetration of soils,” Acoustic Emissions in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, ASTM STP 750, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.174-193 (1981).