隨著世界性的新冠疫情已經消退，加上網路科技發達的加持，混合工作模式 (Hybrid Working)儼然成為許多組織持續採納的工作方式。在此種模式下，員工可以在辦公室和遠程工作之間靈活切換，亦為員工提供更多的自主權和工作 地點的彈性。
然而，混合工作模式可能會對員工敬業度產生影響，本篇碩士論文研究透過 過往實際文獻所探討出的研究結果，結合發放網路問卷給予台灣目前仍正進行 混合工作模式的員工，來深入瞭解在疫情後各企業持續推行混合工作模式 (Hybrid Working)之下，對於員工敬業度(Employee Engagement)的影響，其 中以知覺組織支持(Perceived Organizational Support, POS)與組織認同(Organizational Identification)為序列中介進行研究:知覺組織支持和組織認同 在混合工作模式對員工敬業度的影響中起了明確的序列中介作用。本研究發現， 當員工感知到組織對他們的支持以及當員工對組織有較高的歸屬和認同感時， 員工敬業度會增加。
本研究探究了混合工作模式對員工敬業度之影響，並發現知覺組織支持和組 織認同在其中的作用。這些結果可作為未來組織管理者在制定公司工作方針時 的參考，以提升組織的績效和凝聚力。最後，本研究提出了一些研究限制以及 未來可延伸的研究方向，包括擴大樣本的規模和深度，以及進一步探討其他可 能影響員工敬業度的因素。

As the global COVID-19 has subsided and with the blessing of advanced network technology, “Hybrid Working” has become a way of working that many organizations continue to adopt. Under this model, employees can smoothly switch between office and “Work From Home”, and it also provides employees with more autonomy and flexibility in their work location.
However, the hybrid working may have an impact on employee engagement. This master's thesis reviews the research results of past actual literature and combines the distribution of online questionnaires to employees in Taiwan who are still using the hybrid working model to gain in-depth research. Understand the impact on employee engagement as companies continue to implement hybrid working after the epidemic, in the order of perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational identification mediating research: perceived organizational support and organizational identification play important mediating roles in the impact of hybrid working models on employee engagement. This study found that employee engagement will increase when employees perceive that the organization supports them and when employees have a high sense of belonging and identification with the organization.
This thesis explores the influence of hybrid working models on employee engagement and discovers the role of perceived organizational support and organizational identification. These results can provide a reference for managers of future organizations. The hybrid working model can provide more organizational support, promote employees' identification with the organization and thereby improve the organization's performance and centripetal force.
Finally, this thesis also puts forward the limitations and the directions for future
research expansion, expanding the quality and quantity of the sample, and further exploring other factors that may affect employee engagement.

中文文獻
1. 陳建丞。員工知覺的組織支持與工作績效間的中介模型。研究管理學報 民 97 年，25 卷，3 期，309-331。
2. 王麗丹(2021)。領導風格對工作敬業之影響性研究—組織認同為調節變項。國立中央大學，碩士論文。
3. 郭靜靜(2007)。企業員工組織認同結構維度及其相關研究。廣州暨南大學，博士學位論文。
4. 黃馨儀(2013)。國小教師組織支持、心理資本與工作投入關係之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所，碩士論文。
5. 員工不進公司，會不利溝通?主管太古板，才會對混合辦公有這 4 種誤解。經理人雜誌。2021 年 9 月。 取自: https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/63658
6. 林宜蓁(2023)。居家辦公可行嗎?工作生活平衡、實體工作空間支 持度與員工組織忠誠度之探討。國立高雄科技大學企業管理系。碩士 論文。
7. 陳馨蕙、葉冠妤(2023)。中華經濟研究院調查:疫情後企業允許員 工申請遠距辦公增 1 倍。104 人力銀行。取自: https://vip.104.com.tw/preLogin/recruiterForum/post/135818
8. 張偉豪、鄭時宜(2012)。與結構方程模型共舞:曙光初現。新北市: 前程文化
9. 陳亮君(2023)。居家辦公與離職意向之關聯探討—以時間壓力與職家衝突為序列中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。
10. 黃敬以(2020)。人力資本對組織績效之影響—以流程資本、顧客資本為序列中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。
11. 劉芷廷(2023)。持續性績效管理對員工留任的影響—以員工參與及 公平感知為序列中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。
12. 林修誠(2021)。同儕關係、社會網絡對獵才顧問之離業傾向的影響 —以工作投入及工作績效為序列中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。

英文文獻
1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 40–68.
2. Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308–323.
3. Cambon, A. (2022). Revitalizing Culture in the World of Hybrid Work. Harvard Business Review, November-December.
4. Cascio, W., & Boudreau, J. (2011). Investing in People (pp. 151).
5. Chong, S., Huang, Y., & Chang, C. H. D. (2020). Supporting Interdependent Telework Employees: A Moderated-Mediation Model Linking Daily COVID-19 Task Setbacks to Next-Day Work Withdrawal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 1408-1422.
6. Choudhury, P., Khanna, T., Makridis, C. A., & Schirmann, K. (2022). Is Hybrid Work the Best of Both Worlds? Evidence from a field experiment. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit Working Paper No. 22-63.
7. Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25-57.
8. Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N., & Marvel, J. (1987). Reciprocation ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 743.
9. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived supervisor support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
10. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565-573.
11. Grzegorczyk, M., Mariniello, M., Nurski, L., & Schraepen, T. (2021). Blending the physical and virtual, a hybrid model for the future of work. Bruegel Policy Contribution.
12. Jeremias J. de Klerk, J. J., Joubert, M., & Mosca, H. F. (2021). Is working from home the new workplace panacea? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for the future world of work. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology.
13. Kalyan Ram Kuppachi. (2023). The Impact of Hybrid Work Arrangements on Employee Engagement and Performance. Dissertation thesis. Indian School of Business.
14. Kruse, K. (2012). Employee Engagement 2.0: How to Motivate Your Team for High Performance.
15. Kucukusta, D., Guillet, B. D., & Lau, S. (2014). How do five- and six-day work schedules influence the perceptions of hospitality employees in Hong Kong? Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 19(2), 123-143.
16. Larson, B. Z., Vroman, S. R., & Makarius, E. E. (2020). A guide to managing your (newly) remote workers. Harvard Business Review, 18(2), 27-35.
17. Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., & Robinson, O. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey Global Institute.
18. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
19. Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
20. Masuda, A. D., Holtschalg, C., & Nicklin, J. M. (2017). Why the availability of telecommuting matters: The effects of telecommuting on engagement via goal pursuit. Career Development International, 22(2), 200–219.
21. Morgan, R. E. (2004). Teleworking: An assessment of the benefits and challenges. European Business Review, 16(4), 344-357.
22. Rahaman, M. S., Kudo, S., Rawling, T., Ren, Y., & Salim, F. D. (2020). Seating preference analysis for hybrid workplaces. New Future of Work 2020.
23. Shore, L. M., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano & K. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support, 149-164.
24. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33- 47.
25. Wegge, J., Van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C., & Moltzen, K. (2006). Work motivation, organizational identification, and well-being in call centre work. Work & Stress, 20(1), 60-83.
26. Whillans, A. (Year of Publication). Time Smart: How to Reclaim Your Time and Live a Happier Life.