| 研究生: |
李妤蓁 Yu-Chen Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
應用消能鋼板及曲線消能器之隅撐鋼結構耐震行為研究 Seismic Performance of Steel Knee Braced Frame Structures with Energy Dissipation Plates and Steel Curved Dampers |
| 指導教授: |
許協隆
Hsieh-Lung Hsu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 216 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 隅撐構架 、曲線消能器 、消能鋼板 、耐震設計 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Knee braced frames, Steel Curved dampers |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究對新提出之應用消能鋼板及曲線消能器之隅撐鋼結構耐震性能進行試驗並評估,於研究中配置不同尺度之曲線消能器,探討其應用性及各尺寸參數對整體構架承載性能之影響。此設計中,藉由將梁切成三段並以消能鋼板連接方式,將傳統隅撐抗彎構架之最大彎矩處轉移,避免其於梁與隅撐交界處產生塑性鉸,另搭配曲線消能器以提升其耐震性能。
為驗證此設計之可行性,本研究首先針對不同尺寸之曲線消能器進行構件試驗,以得知消能元件之遲滯行為,後以經由適當配置之不同尺度曲線消能器應用於構架中進行一系列載重試驗,其研究結果顯示,此設計能有效維持梁柱構件等主結構之完整性且提升勁度,整體構架強度可提升為1.3至2.7倍,整體構架總能量消散方面相較於未裝設曲線消能器之隅撐構架亦提升為1.3至2.0倍,由上述之研究結果可知,此設計可有效提升結構之承載性能,對於耐震效能提升設計,具有相當之可行性。
This study focused on the performance evaluation and FEM analysis of steel knee braced frames with curved dampers. The purpose of this study is to prevent the formation of plastic hinges on the beam of traditional knee braced frames. Hence, a new design was proposed. In order to validate the effectiveness of the proposed knee braced frames, a series of cyclic loading tests with various damper dimensions were conducted. According to the experimental results, this design could maintain the main structures in elastic stage. Also, the results showed that significant improvement could be achieved by adding steel curved dampers to the knee braced frames. To be more specific, the strength and stiffness of the proposed design were effectively enhanced. Therefore, the applicability of this design was verified through experimental and numerical studies of the test frames.
1. Krawinkler, H. (1978), “Shear in Beam-Column Joint in Seismic Design of Steel Frames”, Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol.15, pp.82-91.
2. Tsai, K.C. and Popov, E.P. (1990), “Seismic Panel Zone on Elastic Story Drift in Steel Moment Resistance Frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, Vol.116, No.12, pp. 3285-3301.
3. Taranath, B.S. (1988), “Structural Analysis & Design of Tall Building”,McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Bruneau, M., Uang C.M. and Whittaker A. (1998), “Ductile Design of Steel Structures”, McGraw-Hill Company, New York.
5. Aziznamini, A., and Radziminiski, J.B. (1989), “Static and cyclic
performance of semi-rigid steel beam-to-column connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.115, No.12, pp.2979-2999
6. Calado, L., De Matteis, G., and Landolfo, R. (2000), “Experimental response of top and seat angle semi-rigid steel frame connections”, Materials and Structures, Vol.33, No.10, pp.499-510
7. Civjan, S.A., Engelhardt, M.D. and Gross J.L. (2000), “Retrofit of Pre-Northridge Moment-Resisting Connections”, Journal of Structural
Engineering-ASCE, Vol. 126, Iss. 4, pp.445-452.
8. Kim, T., Whittaker, A.S., Gilani, A.S.J., Bertero, V.V. and Takhirov, S.M. (2002), “Cover-Plate and Flange-Plate Steel Moment-Resisting Connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, Vol.128, Iss.4, pp.474-482.
9. Yu, Q.S., Uang, C.M., and Gross, J. (2000), “Seismic Rehabilitation Design of Steel Moment Connection with Welded Haunch”, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, Vol. 126,Iss. 1, pp. 69-78.
10. Plumier, A., Baus, R., Pepin, R., and Schliech, J. (1992), “Anti Seismic Steel Structure Work”. U.S. Patent, No5148642.
11. Chen, S.J. and Tu, C.T.(2004), “Experimental Study of Jumbo Size Reduced Beam Section Connections Using High-Strength Steel”, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, Vol.130, iss.4, pp. 582-587.
12. Tabar, A.M., and Deylami, A.(2005), “Instability of beams with reduced beam section moment connections emphasizing the effect of column panel zone ductility”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol.61, iss.11, pp.1475-1491
13. Lee, C.H., Jeon, S.W., Kim, J.H., and Uang, C.M. (2005), “Effects of Panel Zone Strength and Beam Web Connection Method on Seismic Performance of Reduced Beam Section Steel Moment Connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.131, No.12, pp.1854-1865
14. Guo, B., Gu, Q., and Liu, F. (2006), “Experimental Behavior of Stiffened and Unstiffened End-plate Connections under Cyclic Loading”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.132, No.9, pp.1352-1357
15. Chen, S.J., Yeh, C.H., and Chu, J.M. (1996), “Ductile steel beam-to-column connections for seismic resistance”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.112, No.11, pp.1292-1299
16. Hsu, H.L. and Jean, S.Y.(2003), “Improving Seismic Design Efficiency of Petrochemical Facilities, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 107-117.
17. 周誌桓(2009),隅撐鋼結構耐震性能研究,國立中央大學土木工程學系,碩士論文。
18. 李宗儔(2010),具挫屈控制機制之隅撐構架耐震行為研究,國立中央大學土木工程學系,碩士論文。
19. Halim, H. (2015), Performance Improvement of Semi-rigid Moment Frame with Curved Dampers,國立中央大學土木工程學系,碩士論文。
20. Halim, H. (2019), Seismic Performance of A-Braced Frames with Amplified Deformation Steel Curved Dampers, 國立中央大學土木工程學系,博士論文。
21. 內政部營建署(2006),鋼構造建築物鋼結構設計技術規範。
22. AISC, Manual of Steel Construction Allowable Stress Design, 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago III.
23. 內政部營建署(2011),建築物耐震設計規範及解說,台北。
24. 薛培函(2018),考慮近斷層效應之Y 型隅撐構架耐震行為研究,國立中央大學土木工程學系,碩士論文。
25. 林岡岳(2017),多層多跨高延展隅撐構架之耐震行為研究,國立中央大學土木工程學系,碩士論文。